Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
9:33AM Wednesday 07 January, 2009
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Ashley Robinson Ashley Robinson is the master of self-deprecation. He reckons he has two sorts of luck – bad luck and no luck. As a lifetime resident of the Coast, this former publican has plenty of nostalgic memories to share.

Has alcopop tax already failed?

June 16 | Ashley Robinson

In the famous words of Pauline, “please explain?”.

Our new fearless leader, Kevin 07, spent all that taxpayer money on getting together some smart people and, of course, the obligatory celebrities from around the country to nut out what to do for the future.

Now I didn’t read what all the items were they discussed but I am truly hoping that putting extra tax on pre-mix drinks to curb binge drinking and its associated problems wasn’t Hugh Jackman’s or Cate Blanchette’s idea.

For that matter, I kind of hope it wasn’t anyone’s at the futures forum and, like most ridiculous decisions, was instigated by a Sir Humphrey-type bureaucrat (ABC’s Yes Minister), because that would be what I would expect.

In last week’s press it was declared that the higher tax hadn’t worked.

Well, hello! Of course it hasn’t worked. Even a low double figure IQer like me could have told them that, for free.

Just the other day I was on my cycle ride around Quad Park.

It was the morning after Powderfinger performed at Lake Kawana and, as usual, there were empty drink containers strewn around the area.

Yes, there were less alco-pops – as Kev loves to call them – a lot less than normal, in fact.

But I saw something I have never seen before – empty white wine bottles – of the $9-$10 variety – lying in the gutters.

That doesn’t surprise me. Nor does seeing empty spirit bottles and casks – all with higher alcohol content than the fizzy drinks that they put the tax up on.

There were also more empties of imported heavy beers lying around.

So what will the government do now, increase the tax on all alcohol or admit that maybe they were a bit naïve when they rushed the idea through?

But they shouldn’t feel alone. Their country cousins at state level have had a crack too – and again I don’t know where they got their advice from.

They are introducing a levy on pubs and clubs on late trading hours which, in my mind, sounded reasonable until I saw how they did it.

If you want to trade after midnight, you have to pay for either a 3am licence or a 5am one, depending on where it is.

In my mind if a pub used to trade until 1am, like a lot do, but they have to pay a fee that means they can trade till 3am, what do you reckon they will do?

Probably stay open and try to recoup the levy and, in fact, may make the problem worse.

Again I ask, who do the geniuses that come up with these ideas talk to?

Now I understand all parties are trying to do something to curb violence and alcoholism, and I am all for that.

But if they are going to keep making knee-jerk reactions to everything, why stop at alcohol?

Why not slap a violence tax on any computer game that has violence in it, because they have to be contributing to the problems?

DVDs and box office movies could cop a violence tax as well, and music video clips shouldn’t miss out as well.

But don’t stop there. What about boxercise, boot camps and any gym that has hand-to-hand combat drills?

May as well tax them as well because it may be minutely possible that they are muddying the clarity between fact and fiction.

Of course, most of what I am writing is, in fact, fiction with the only winner being the government if they taxed everything involving violence or alcohol.

Surely the answer is clear. The judicial system is sadly in need of a revamp to make sure the punishment fits the crime.

Every day in the news there are people desperately disappointed with sentences administered by our courts, whatever the crime.

And usually, on those same pages, there is a photo of some goose leaving court giving the finger to the media and showing no remorse whatsoever.

I am all for responsible service and distribution of alcohol, and the punishment of venues and alcohol companies if they breach.

But haven’t we all got to start exercising some common sense in the court room and expect common decency from each other.

Surely someone told Kevin that in their talkfest in Canberra.

Recent Comments

on 16 June, 2008 at 8:13 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Gee Ashley you must think most of us have short memories.

“I am all for responsible service and distribution of alcohol, and the punishment of venues and alcohol companies if they breach.”

Weren’t you in charge of Club Mud when they’d serve buckets of cocktails and throw the patrons out onto the footpath at closing time, fights, vomiting and associated vandalism was the norm.
But yes after years of outrage some token measures were taken by the night club and pub operators along the Mooloolaba strip.

Your years of experience in the pub trade must have made you aware of the slightly built females who would have 2 or three of these fizzy lollie water and be blind drunk? The stuff goes down like soft drink.

Ashley maybe you should have a look at this and other articles in the Daily that criticise the Government for trying to do something.

Typical of some in the media, dammed if you do & dammed if you don’t!
on 16 June, 2008 at 9:08 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Fair call, my only defense being that on many occasions in my column I have mentioned that I have made some mistakes in this industry, but I take your point. The point I was trying to make was that yes fizzy drinks are dangerous but putting the price up will only drive them to something with possibly more alcohol and the only real way this problem will be curtailed is the courts taking a tougher stand.

Ashley
on 16 June, 2008 at 9:28 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The courts don’t normally deal with the vast majority of those young uns who were getting smashed up on the lollie water.

I thought the tax was to attempt to address a serious health issue more than the lawlessness issue.

Do nothing is not an option.

On another side issue, I see your good mate Slippery Pete is in the local media criticising the State Labour government for trying to upgrade the railway line.
Now there’s a story about someone being out of touch!
on 16 June, 2008 at 10:11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The Alco-Pop tax has done nothing to curb the drinking habits of anyone. All it has done is drive people to full spirits and other drinks, a fact highlighted by a recent review completed for the government.
Whilst some would argue this was an attempt to address health issues however now it can be proven it was ill conceived and not thought out therefore it should be reversed and other solutions found. Maybe we should educate the young in how to drink rather than just saying NO all the time. What happened when we told our kids not to do something? They did it.
Good intentions are not always good results.
on 4 July, 2008 at 7:52 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The alco-pop tax is a money grab pure and simple, what did the masses drink before they were around? Beer and cheap wine products and there are many more options in these products today then the old Passion Pop or Goon.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive