Whether taking on developers hell-bent on destroying the Coast’s natural appeal or a Prime Minister indifferent to the plight of the poor, Bill Hoffman has never been one to mince his words. Bill’s been a journalist for 32 years, 29 of those on the Coast. Love him or hate him, he'll get you blogging. What kind of future will our kids inherit?
| Bill Hoffman
Queensland government Minister for Sustainability, Climate Change and Innovation Andrew McNamara recently made a series of points critical to the future of our children and grandchildren.
There has been much talk about that future in the past few weeks from candidates for the new Sunshine Coast Regional Council.
The two mayoral contenders have campaigned vigorously on their records – which are well worth examination, because ultimately the new mayor’s power will come only from his capacity as a leader.
Council decisions require a democratic process which affords each elected member, including the mayor, one vote. Voters have to decide which of the pair has the greater capacity to lead the new council and to work with councillors to make decisions that best reflect the will of the majority of ratepayers.
Mr McNamara’s address to the Brisbane Institute made it clear how crucial it is that we get it right.
There have been attempts to make “housing affordability” a campaign issue. The development industry has claimed that the release of more subdivision land is the pathway to that goal.
Urban Development Institute of Australia Sunshine Coast regional head David Oliver sees planning for growth and catering for its inevitability through state provision of adequate infrastructure as critical.
Respondents to the Sunshine Coast Daily’s recent Your Coast Your Say survey expressed concern about the rate of growth and the impact an increased population would have on their quality of life.
They may be surprised to find they have an ally in the Queensland Cabinet.
This is what Minister McNamara had to say on the subject of growth and sustainability.
“Population distribution, standard of living and sustainability are linked inextricably,’’ he told the Brisbane Institute.
“A long-term study pointing out the appropriate population distribution for Australia, including modelling of the impacts both of climate change and peak oil, must now become a priority.
“In the 21st century, the human race must finally confront the reality that in the closed system that is planet Earth, there are limits to growth.
“No matter how clever we are, there is no escaping the physical limits of the world’s resources. The laws of physics trump the laws of economics every time.”
Mr McNamara called for a focus on “smart growth” that was low-carbon, low-pollution and resource-neutral, and which added to the natural capital, instead of destroying it.
He said global demands on natural systems exceeded their sustainable yield by an estimated 25 per cent.
“We are meeting current demands by consuming the Earth’s natural assets, setting the stage for decline and collapse,” he said.
“With some notable exceptions, policy makers have been guilty of allowing sustainability to be cast as a peculiarly environmental issue, marginalised from the main game of economic development.
“Pigeon-holing it as a narrow environmental concept has led us down a path of accepting unsustainability in the name of jobs and economic development.
“Yet what have we done but draw upon the Earth’s non-renewable resources as if they were limitless, and create an economy that assumes – indeed demands – cheap energy to sustain the national and international movement of food and goods and water and people in ever greater volumes and numbers.”
Mr McNamara called for the building of a new economy powered largely by renewable energy, backed by a diversified transport system, and that uses and re-uses everything.
And he warned of the dangers of exponential population growth, quoting American biologist Edward O. Wilson, who said: “The rampaging monster loose upon the land is over-population. In its presence, sustainability is but a fragile theoretical construct.”
Mr McNamara also quoted former NSW premier Bob Carr’s address to the 1997 National Conference of Australians for an Ecologically Sustainable Population, in which he said unsustainable growth was degrading the planet.
“Australia must begin to think of itself as a country with a population problem,’’ Mr Carr said in that speech.
“Let’s throw away for all time the notion that Australia is an empty space just waiting to be filled up. Our rivers, our soils, our vegetation won’t allow that to happen without an enormous cost to those who come after us.”
Mr McNamara said that half a generation after those wise words by Bob Carr, they remained just as true and just as unacted upon as they were in 1997.
“In 1949, Australia’s greatest economist, Colin Clark, presented the keynote paper “World Resources and World Population” at the UN Scientific Conference on Conservation and Utilisation of Resources,’’ he said.
“He noted that the ‘conservation of soil, forests, stream flows and natural biological equilibria is certainly one of the most important and urgent tasks which faces us today’.”
It still is.
It can only be hoped that from the 50 people who have nominated for positions on the new Sunshine Coast regional council, voters can identify those who understand that “sustainability” is more than a buzzword and that it means more than installing a rainwater tank and a solar hot-water system in new so-called “green” subdivisions.
It will be not much of a future if they can’t.

Mostly cloudy min 15° - max 24°




Not Registered? Quick registration and comment.


Recent Comments
I would like to see the Australian Government with the massive surpluses now seeming to occur every year spend that money paying for every roof ( residential ) to have a solar system installed - Australia wide. Would do more for Australians, their Environment and benefit the World than tax cuts.
Sufficient solar panels to just cover Hot Water , and Electricity for 4 persons per household (homes).
If people want to heat swimming pools and other items then they will need to pay for for those extra panels themselves.
What a Benefit it would be to all of us - and once again Australia could lead the World by our example!!
Many candidates throw around the buzz words people want to hear but few have the actual understanding to implement it. Take a look at the recent Federal Election and all its promises yet now seeing all the razor gang recommendations, etc you wonder just how much of the promises were actually based on fact and reality.
I am not defending the previous govt, I am simply saying the new govt were elected on a wave of emotion and need for change (probably a justified one) but what I see today is promises to cancel something or change the name to something else. Example is the carers’ rebate which was cancelled then replaced by some other type of funding then a back flip with half twist in the pike position.
Our candidates have made lots of promises and use all the buzz words but who ACTUALLY has the qualifications to carry them out. I am sure Mr McNamara surrounded himself with experts in the field, not a bunch of people with self interest at heart. One of the best responses I heard at a candidates night was "I don't have the facts in this matter so I cannot comment at this time" yet all the others "knew everything". The first answer was correct because the response from the others were so vague and general it was obvious they had no idea and were just flapping their lips
Bob or Joe will only be as good as the 12 people with them and I just hope the first meeting is not "The last supper".
'Local government plans, policies, and actions must achieve social, economic and natural environment's ecological sustainability favoured by the majority of residents'.
It went on to detail what kind of leadership and governance, population growth, development, natural assets, economy, transportand sport, community and culture were part of that vision.
OSCAR then took their participation further by designing questions for candidates to find out which ones most closely matched the vision.
The winners were: Div 1 Anna Grosskreutz; Div 2 Ron Strong; Div 3 Keryn Jones; Div 4 Andrew Champion; Div 5 Dick Newman; Div 7 Ted Hungerfor; Div 8 Debbie Blumel; Div 9 Vivian Griffin; Div 10 Alexina Johnson; Div 11 Russell Green; Div 12 Aaron White and Mayor Bob Abbot.
So there you have it, 15 odd residents groups joined together to provide all residents (except Div 6) with a guide to retaining the things we value about the Coast.
Guess which Division was the only one on the Coast which did not have a participating Residents group ? You guessed it !
As a matter of fact, I recall you being very vocal in criticising OSCAR as not being representative of your area at the time that Joe Natoli was refusing to talk to OSCAR's executive.
From OSCAR's point of view, that was disappointing but hopefully all locals will be aware of the candidate's credentials re sustainablity and vote accordingly. I urge all bloggers to take note of OSCAR's interview results as it is so important that we get the best candidates to represent us
However my observation is that Div 6 is such a lost cause it doesn't matter.
It will get an urban development oriented councillor regardless of what any of them say.
The only hope is that those associations that might have joined haven't sat on the fence because they are afraid they will upset someone they might have to work with from next week.
It would be hard for residents of Division 6 to have a history of getting together and being active within the community when they would have to contend with the bullying and vitriol that emanates from Cr Hulett in a relentless and nauseating stream.
I agree that Divison 6 looks sad...but they can achieve a very important thing...vote Hulett OUT and they may have a chance of moving forward.
Hulett's capacity to destroy all that he touches is nowhere near matched by the other contesters for the division.
That presentation was delivered to the local government area directly to the south of the Sunshine Coast, the Caboolture Shire Council, now merged and forming part of the Moreton Regional council.
The aim was to stop the silly rectangular subdivision of over 700 acres of land, that took no account of geography, topography, eco-systems, waterways, social needs or anything that looked remotely sustainable.
An alternative proposal was put forward that would have been sustainable and economically viable, although it was intended to be not for profit. It would have been a most advanced eco-village, drawing on years of lessons and experiences around the world, focussed on learning and operated democratically.
The concept of sustainability bandied about frequently by Prime Minister Paul Keating, but not faintly understood by many other people, or even recognised by public servants, fell flat. The subdivision proceeded. the eco-village concept failed, but the vision lives on.
This all happened in 1994/5. It's now 2008 and Governments and the community still fail to grasp the full meaning of social, environmental, economic and spiritual sustainability. Governments and politicians keep talking of growth as if it ought to be endless. The Queensland Government actually advertised interstate to induce people to live in south east Queensland, without giving any attention to the failing infrastructure or any future planning.
Other, better ways of living and learning exist, even in this region - but most people choose to look the other way. Current legislation does not even permit innovative, sustainable uses and ownership of land.
I sincerely hope the new Sunshine Coast Regional Council exercises wisdom and foresight and draws upon the best ways to balance the needs of people and the environment. They have many hurdles to overcome.
Yes I did voice my opposition to OSCAR generally, not just my division, and this was also why I wondered why they did not have all divisions covered. My criticism of OSCAR revolved around exactly what they were representing and maybe this goes to show they do not represent the entire coast, that was all. Anyway it is over now.
I find the comment Div 6 is a lost cause very concerning as this is one of the biggest growing areas on the coast and should actually draw a lot of comments as to who should be elected. I have stated my preference is Lucretia Wheeler.
That's right, 142 hectares of land adjoining a National Park that is zoned Agricultural land, Horticultural land and rural residential.
This action contravened Maroochy 2000 town plan, the South East Queensland Regional Plan and took no account of the wishes of the majority of residents.
Please, voters, don't give us someone who will not abide by the planning scheme.
All the talk about Kyoto and planning and growth models are just masking the reality that our environment is not infinite and that we are already losing many species of wildlife and doing irreparable damage to our coastlines.
The economy is dominating any logic. We are ruining such a wonderful country by too many people and our cities are becoming crowded and violent. We need to make a sacrifice and have a stable population, especially in the face of climate change.