'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Bill Hoffman Whether taking on developers hell-bent on destroying the Coast’s natural appeal or a Prime Minister indifferent to the plight of the poor, Bill Hoffman has never been one to mince his words. Bill’s been a journalist for 32 years, 29 of those on the Coast. Love him or hate him, he'll get you blogging.

Coast voters clearly want old cultures put to bed

March 19 | Bill Hoffman

The overwhelming mandate delivered to Bob Abbot and his policy platform in Saturday’s poll makes clear that Sunshine Coast residents finally recognised the opportunity afforded by forced amalgamations.

There is nothing ambiguous about the size or uniformity of the support the former Noosa mayor received across the region for his policies of sustainability and open governance.

Voters took the opportunity to rid themselves of former councillors who had demonstrated by the way they voted on crucial decisions and in their interaction with the electorate that they were out of step with both its expectations and aspirations.

Local Government Association of Queensland executive director Greg Hallam said on Monday that the result delivered a message the state government needed to hear loud and clear.

He said it was an example of anti-developer sentiment that was rife across the state’s growth corridors.

In the past 30 years, Noosa has shown itself to be the only Sunshine Coast council willing, in its planning deliberations, to place sufficient weight on the impact of development on the natural environment.

Despite their almost constant whingeing about the restraints placed on them, particularly in Maroochy, the truth is that developers have enjoyed a rails run, with elected representatives too often showing a willingness to water down planning department recommendations to enhance the short-term profits of a few.
It is not, nor ever should have been, the responsibility of any level of government to justify through its planning decisions the price paid for a block of land.

Mr Abbot will find his vision has many, many supporters among Maroochy and Caloundra staff.

Noosa’s strength has long been that the unambiguous expectations of the community were reflected in the policy settings of its council and their implementation by both staff and the elected representatives.

If you thought you heard a massive release of breath coming from the bowels of Maroochy shire’s administrative headquarters in Nambour on Monday and saw a rainbow forming overhead, you were not mistaken.

Saturday’s vote comes with an enormous level of community expectation that old cultures will be put to bed for good.

No councillor elected on Saturday should have any doubt about the overwhelming support for Bob Abbot and his policy platform.

There are no pockets of resistance to the cultural change he has promised to implement. There is not a polling booth on the Sunshine Coast that did not afford him a handsome majority.

Despite that mandate, do not think for a moment that the whining will stop. Special interest groups long used to being able to argue away any attempts to balance the imperative of their profit margin with environmental empathy will not take lightly erosion of their long-held opportunity.

It is time they listened and adjusted to new realities. It is long time, as Mr Hallam said, for the state government to also listen and to adjust to those realities.

Despite the continued disarray of her opposition, Premier Anna Bligh’s mandate will quickly disappear if she chooses to cut this and other regional councils out of the planning process to better facilitate the growth, growth, growth mindset unaltered since the days of Joh Bjelke Petersen.

It is just plain wrong that this, or anywhere else for that matter, can accommodate growth indefinitely without the loss of environmental integrity and sense of place and community.

The SEQ regional plan and infrastructure plan pretend to be the very model of good governance. They are not.

They are documents that, in the main, facilitate the growth and profit projections of a small group of large land bankers.

The plans afford no investment in environmental infrastructure. New roads and transport corridors to service new developments will trump a wildlife corridor or biodiversity every single time.

So-called infill development which effectively means the replacement of the old Residential A zonings with the right to knock down homes and replace them with unit blocks will erode sense of community every time.

No one should be under any illusion that Mr Abbot, and the team elected to form the first council in a new era of local government, can simply wave a magic wand and satisfy the full weight of community expectations.

The next four years are critical to this region’s future. The administration and elected representatives must quickly reach an understanding of the direction forward while ensuring the community has a clear understanding of the rationale behind its decision making.

And then it must come to terms with a state government whose use of language often obscures the real intent of its policy settings.

Recent Comments

on 19 March, 2008 at 12:28 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
In response to the call on developer control, would the Daily please look into and explain to the community what is on the mind of Stockland for the large parcel in Bokarina, please.
on 19 March, 2008 at 7:10 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Spot on Bill. S

The SEQ planning was in mayhem and in adequate to allow for any manner of sensible outcomes.

From day one the development lobby had superior numbers, better resources and slicker Government access.

Often in this process the developers armed with a battalion of support staff, would be represented at three levels, commerce, industry and agriculture.

They then pitted themselves against some poor wretched soul, trying to cater for the needs of the environment and on many occasions also being saddled with the onerous responsibility of representing the community.

Well, what manner of outcome could we expect? Giving away a couple of baubles and beads in the form of a few smallish National Parks is no compensation for the loss of virtually all else.

But, the big issues such as, the financing of infrastructure and control of growth was not going to be brought to the table.

From far away it looks as though for the first time in 25 years the composition of this Council will balance in terms of community needs and gender equity.

Bob will have 3 times the power that any Mayor has been able to exert and with this a far better chance of influencing political figures at state and federal levels.

Well done Sunshine Coast,

in politics winnowing is as important as reaping.


Joe Ruiz-Avila
on 19 March, 2008 at 7:25 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bill. I believe that what we have seen in this election is the emergence of "People Power" on the Coast. The Silent Majority have stood up for themselves and become the Vocal Majority.

Many people have long been concerned about the disenfranchisement of the Community, on the Coast and elsewhere, by vocal, well funded minority groups often more concerned with self interest than anything else.

This became most evident in one of our Councils (which I won't name) when it became clear that they had no apparent interest in what their constituents thought or had to say. In fact they seemed to go out of their way to hide what they were doing from the people for whom they supposedly worked.

I think that the Noosa Council's approach to community involvement in governance, although not perfect, was a shining light at the end of the tunnel for many of the Coast's people. It demonstrated, I think, that there was another way and that the Community did not have to meekly accept what was being inflicted on them.

The people have spoken. They have given an unequivocal mandate to Bob Abbot and the new Councillors. The challenge now is for them to work together to implement the policies espoused during the election campaign. Open the Council to the Community's input and scrutiny and get the message across to the State Government.

The State Government for their part obviously felt that 30,000 people didn't deserve to be listened to...what about 300,000 ? I also believe that there is an emerging anti-growth sentiment on the Gold Coast. The people of Brisbane decided years ago that they had had enough. That's why all the growth is being shoved into Brisbane's satellite cities.
on 19 March, 2008 at 7:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bill, those are the truest words you ever wrote! They should be compulsory reading for every new councillor... and Anna Bligh.
on 19 March, 2008 at 7:45 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
What is often overlooked when considering Noosa's planning strategies and successes is that they are the product of many decades of community activism. There's a whole history of battles which produced the very things which Noosa was fighting to retain under amalgamation.

If the rest of the coast genuinely wants to become more "Noosafied" then they have to be prepared to roll up their sleeves and fight. The new SCRC may have a green tinge, but it won't be long before the development lobby begins to assert their influence.

One can't simply rely on elected representatives. Remember, even the last Noosa Council was hauled in by the Minister for approving development (Attunga Heights) that went outside their own town plan.

But the real threat, as Bill Hoffman quite rightly states, is the pro-development policies of the State Government. The Urban Land Development Authority Bill allows Bligh et al to override local planning laws at whim. If that comes to pass, we'll really need to roll up our sleeves.
on 19 March, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
By the way Bill, did you know that the SEQ Regional Plan is due for its first 5 yearly revision. When it was first launched, we were told that it is a 5 year document which must be reviewed at least every 5 years. I believe that all of our previous Councils were advised that planning for this was now in train.

The current lot of Local Growth Management Strategies will form a major part of the input for this revision I believe. Let's hope that we all get a chance to have a say about them before the State signs off on them and they are locked in for another 5 years.
on 19 March, 2008 at 8:59 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Premier Bligh's mandate on the Sunshine Coast? If you are looking for pockets of resistance, that's one right there. The State Government may have a firm voter base on the Coast, but the tangible political capital it had here was the two seats it lost at the 2006 election. It doesn't need to win them back to retain government.

The SEQRP is the first attempt by the Government to set firm local ground rules in a region to prevent the disasters that developers and cowboy councillors can inflict. The Maroochy and Caloundra councils had since proved themselves incorrigible and had to be amalgamated out of existence.

If you look at the huge holdings of a single corporation at the southern gateway to the Coast where the bulk of new arrivals will live and work you can see the logic of the State Government stepping in to ensure that, while it will still be sold off piecemeal to the highest bidder, the way any parcel is developed will be determined by wider needs than its developer's. The big private land banks can drip-feed the market, but determining the purpose for which the land can be sold requires a large and incorruptible counter-force like a state government - or an amalgamated Coast council.
on 19 March, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well said Bill; you have a good handle on this.

Atapro: I’ll name them, because we still have two big issues with the old Maroochy Shire Council.

Firstly, some of the Maroochy Shire Councillors got back in; not perhaps the worst of them, but they still oversaw that council getting into the state that it did. Those councillors will need to be watched carefully and we, the ratepayers, need to keep on top of them and make sure that they really know that we want and expect change.

Secondly, we may have got rid of most of the Maroochy Shire councillors but their cultural influence is still there within the council.

Over the last couple of years I have been heavily exposed to this culture and my experience is that it is broad and deep; a lot of work will be required to truly clear it, before it infects the rest of the Sunshine Coast Regional Council.
on 19 March, 2008 at 7:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Perhaps the cultural exchange goes the other way, save_the_ SC.

An incorruptible counterforce is only part of the picture isn't it? And you don't gain those qualities through sheer size, you also have to have very strict codes of conduct and accountability mechanisms.

And while we're on the subject let's have a discussion about politics, policies, procedures and precedents and......democracy.

Should a precedent be set when a policy is overridden by a political decision?

For example If Links had gone ahead in Montville, with its multi storey hotel, even though it was against the town plan, there would be a precedent for multi storey dwellings on the Range.

The next step would obviously have been to change the town plan to reflect the fact.

Thankfully it didn't happen, but I bet it has elsewhere.

Policies and planning schemes should remain intact and enforced unless changed by public assent through full and open public consultation.
on 20 March, 2008 at 3:45 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bill:

"Saturday’s vote comes with an enormous level of community expectation that old cultures will be put to bed for good.

No councillor elected on Saturday should have any doubt about the overwhelming support for Bob Abbot and his policy platform. "

I voted for Joe. However, there is not one person I spoke to (for example, at my Golf Club....outside Noosa,) who voted for Bob for or because of his 'policies.' They all intended to give Bob their vote because they had some complaint, valid or otherwise is irrelevant, about Joe. It was all anti Joe, not pro Bob.

I think I've said elsewhere.....it would have been much more of a test had there been a third candidate, eg, Don Aldous. If his hat had been in the ring, and Bob got up on the basis of 70% support, you would be dead right, Bill.
on 20 March, 2008 at 5:20 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bob, seems as if you play to much golf!! You should get out into the real world, and listen to the real people. They didnt want Don Aldous with his metal leggo land Kings Beach Park, highrise, and infil. They voted for Abbott because of his sensitivity to the environment, balance with tourism, and respect of the rights of Sunshine Coast residents, and his ability to listen to the community.
on 21 March, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Perhaps Bob and his golfing buddies wanted Don Aldous' plan for a new golf course at Maleny.

That is about as popular as a golf course at Montville. And just as stupid, given the the topography of the site, the proximity to the water course that fills Baroon Pocket Dam and access.
on 21 March, 2008 at 4:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hear, hear! Thankfully 'Teflon Don' didn't stand. He saw the tsunami coming.

Aldous and his mindless Caloundra cronies did their best to force an 18-hole golf course onto Maleny after 76 percent of residents said clearly they did not want it.

A reckless minority almost got its way. Now, hopefully, under Bob Abbot, the future of Maleny Precinct will be decided out in the open and take into account what the whole community wants.
on 21 March, 2008 at 7:56 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
boyoboy, savetherange......not one of the people I spoke to mentioned Aldous or those issues. I threw him up, argumentatively, as a potential third option. I could just have easily suggested Alison to make my point.

And snapperking, they never mentioned golf courses either.

You have each entirely missed my point, being so tied up in your own personal agendas.

I'll dumb it down some more especially for ye.

This 70/30 outcome was not pro Bob, but anti Joe, and the 'across the Coast' anti had jack poo to do with golf courses in Maleny.

boyoboy said:

"You should get out into the real world, and listen to the real people. "

That I do Elde Fruit.....................I reckon my exposure to the 'real people' would far exceed yours, each, and every day right across the entire Sunshine Coast.

You lot get so very busy and intense about your own dung hill (and that is understandable) that you never ever get to hear what the punters across the Coast are saying.

Most of them do not even know about the proposed golf resort at Maleny, and if my mail is correct the people of Maleny themselves are divided, to such an extent that many are not willing to say outright what they think because of potential community up-rise directed at them from both sides of the camp, no matter what personal preference they have.
on 22 March, 2008 at 12:13 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Lets hope now that the cowboy developers who had wormed their way into Caloundra and Maroochydore will now roll up their gaudy tents and flim flam their way back to their natural environment.....the Gold Coast. Hasta la Vista and good riddance !
on 22 March, 2008 at 11:18 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bob_Bates your assessment of the reasons for Bob Abbot's 70 percent support in the election is based on what? Yacking to your buddies? Unless you can cite quality research such as a survey based a reasonably sized sample group made up of cross section of the community using tried and tested methodology, you're simply passing wind.
on 22 March, 2008 at 12:44 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Correct Jason, I am expressing an opinion, just like Bill did. Mine is base on casual discussion with a large cross-section of the community.
on 22 March, 2008 at 2:46 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bob_bates. I have been carefully avoiding getting involved in this. Mainly because I haven't got the foggiest what you are on about most of the time. I don't think you do either. But let me ask you this question.

If Bob Abbot's landslide win was more to do with anti Joe sentiment than his own policies, how do you account for the almost total changing of the guard among the Divisional candidates.

A majority of those were people who, before the election, you said would never ever get in. Or if they did it would be a total travesty according to you. In fact, you thought that most of them were on BigBob's "team" at one time or another.

Were those results all just anti-Joe sentiment as well...or could they have had something to do with a desire for a change of direction by most of the Coast's people ?
on 22 March, 2008 at 7:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You have the wrong bloke atapro.

"A majority of those were people who, before the election, you said would never ever get in. Or if they did it would be a total travesty according to you. In fact, you thought that most of them were on BigBob's "team" at one time or another.

Not me.

Why do you make stuff like that up?
on 22 March, 2008 at 9:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Atapro posted:

“If Bob Abbot's landslide win was more to do with anti Joe sentiment than his own policies, how do you account for the almost total changing of the guard among the Divisional candidates.”

Somehow, I have to make sense of your phrase, ‘changing of the guard among the Divisional candidates."

There can hardly be a guard change among unsuccessful new contenders, so where do I turn now to make sense of what you have posted? Maybe, you mean that a contender ran and beat a sitting Councillor. So, let’s have a look at that.

Do you agree that only Ms Blummel and Ms Griffin (if I recall correctly, she previously resigned in protest against Abbot’s actions) can claim to have knocked out a sitting Councillor? Is it their victories which underpin your allegation about “almost total changing of the guard among the divisional candidates?”
on 23 March, 2008 at 10:28 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bob_bates: If you have nothing to contribute on the subject it's better for you to say nothing at all.

But, having said that, farewell my friend. My mission in these Blogs is complete. I have actually carried on a few days longer than I had intended.
on 23 March, 2008 at 12:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Oh, and by the way Bob_bates. If I have incorrectly attributed those comments to you, my apologies. I must have been mistaking you for someone similar.

What I was referring to by "changing of the guard" was the total removal of a certain element on the previous councils.

Again. It's been great having these online chats. All the best in your future blogging.
on 23 March, 2008 at 8:35 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Were you an official moderator, atapro?

Bob_Bates, you mentioned your golf club colleagues said didn't vote for Bob Abbot. I understood you to imply they would have voted for Aldous.

It's great that your retired old friends like golf, it keeps them fit. But golf courses are not part of the character of the Range and those candidates who didn't win the Range divisions now know that.
on 26 March, 2008 at 10:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Gee! I think it's drawing a long bow to suggest that all folks voted for Bob because of his policies. There were only two candidates……….. one you could vote for and one you couldn’t. Mr Hoffman, although I will be much happier to see a firmer and more balanced control of growth here, I really don’t think the margin of Bob’s win is a true indicator of the voter’s thoughts.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive