Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
5:23AM Wednesday 07 January, 2009
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Bill Hoffman Whether taking on developers hell-bent on destroying the Coast’s natural appeal or a Prime Minister indifferent to the plight of the poor, Bill Hoffman has never been one to mince his words. Bill’s been a journalist for 32 years, 29 of those on the Coast. Love him or hate him, he'll get you blogging.

Gloom and doom is no excuse for opportunism

October 29 | Bill Hoffman

The behaviour of federal opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull during the past two weeks of gloom and crisis has been appalling.

The pretension that the Rudd government is powerless to deal with current world events without Turnbull’s contribution is no more than political opportunism.

All any Australian government can do is try and lessen the impacts, something that has already been done with the $10.4 billion package that will help stimulate the economy from early December.

The man is attempting to create an impression that only the Coalition has the skills to manage the economy.

Was he not a member of a government that hung onto the reins of a resource boom and inflation in property and share markets all the while describing the artifice that has proved without foundation as an example of its economic brilliance?

I’m not about to begin debating the pseudonyms of the blogosphere but really, does anyone truly believe that we would be better off right now with a government that had conspired with big business to produce Work Choices?

That Orwellian piece of legislation was about stripping choices from workers by enabling businesses to cut more cost from their bottom line than was humanly decent.

All the while fat cats were receiving massive bonuses for delivering to the share market profit results built increasingly not on growing market share and the quality of their products, but through the erosion of the pay and conditions that allow ordinary people the right to family time and a reasonable wage.

Ask anyone who has worked on split shifts and casual hours about how great the past decade has been.

Ask all those earning under $30,000 a year while performing critical roles the same question.

Think how much more vulnerable the most vulnerable of us would be with a government that was willing, even in the so-called good times, to deny them any real and sustaining share.

Feeding off this have been the investment funds that would instantly devalue companies that failed to deliver unrealistic and unsustainable results.

Former United States federal reserve chairman Alan Greenspan admitted last week to a house oversight committee that he had got it wrong.

Green’s economic philosophy that the self-interest of lending institutions would protect shareholder equity informed a certain, widely-held conservative view that government regulation was detrimental to efficient economies.

The market can not now have it both ways.

Any guarantees from government must come at the price of greater regulation.

Where does Malcolm Turnbull really stand and who does he represent?

What’s his vision for the Australia of the future and where does each of us fit in that?

If he is to fashion himself with any legitimacy as an alternative prime minister he will need to do more than fire cheap shots from the sidelines.

Rather than hectoring the government he needs to explain himself.

The fact that he was once a merchant banker is hardly reason for the elected government to allow him a place back at the policy table.

Nor is the prospect that he may stop his harmful and disruptive assault on treasury secretary Dr Ken Henry.

The naked opportunism of the opposition leader’s display during the past fortnight has done him absolutely no credit.

A global economic crisis is not a political opportunity. Its impact is already being felt at every level of society.

Mr Turnbull would be better to give the theatrics a break and instead begin developing a narrative that will re-position a party that has been a cheer leader for philosophies and processes that have delivered us this mess in the first place.

On your bike

I have a mate who’s fast approaching 70.

He reminds me a bit of the economy. He has a dodgy ticker which is being regulated by a machine implanted in his chest.

The trouble is that there is still some tinkering to do with his medication.

This makes him prone to occasionally falling down, sometimes with dire consequence.

A week ago he embraced, head first, the Plaza car park. When I went to check on him after he had been released from hospital, I found him standing on his front porch, bicycle helmet in hand and pushie seemingly at the ready.

“I hope you are not about to get on that,’’ I said like a parent admonishing a wayward teenager.

In fact, he had just come back from visiting the doctor to check the progress of his injuries.

His confidence that he won’t fall down keeps him going and really, short of locking the doors and staying in bed, is the only option he has.

A lesson for us all.

Recent Comments

on 29 October, 2008 at 1:31 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Workchoices in the hands of decent employers was no threat to employees. I do agree though that, in the hands of the unscrupulous employers, it was a disaster.

There has to be some sort of happy medium as small businesses did need more protection to be able to run their businesses without the fear of disruption, litigation and unions when trying to get rid of unscrupulous employees....and there are plenty of those.

I've been on both sides of the fence...a small business owner and an employee. And believe me, being a small business owner is no picnic. It's damn hard slog, worry and you put everything you own on the line. It does get disheartening when every time you turn around it seems there is another dang government form to fill out and employees with their hand out thinking they deserve more and more for taking no personal financial risk of their own when they have no idea of how much risk and work their employers are putting in to 'their' business.

Yes, being a business owner is a choice people make and the good and bad that goes with it. But so is being an employee.

As for Malcolm Turnbull...aren't they all pretty much as bad as each other when they're the back seat drivers?
on 29 October, 2008 at 8:39 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Get off your LEFT WING perch, Hoffman. Most Commentators agree that Rudd & The Dill have mucked up. Thank God I am no longer an Employer, Workchoices would have been a great advantage for the country if given a proper try. How much of their members money did Unions spend, along with the support of you & your papers, to get rid of Workchoices & Howard.
on 29 October, 2008 at 9:11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm with "justthinking". I have seen both sides and there were lots of benefits to Work Choices but some tried to manipulate it to the workers loss, shame on them. But look at what is happening now, we have had more strikes and work disruptions in the last 12 months than in the last 5 years.
As to Malcom Turnbull, he is doing what any opposition would do and what the Labour Opposition did constantly when they were in the wilderness for a decade. Popular choices by our PM does not mean good choices for our country. You may be a diehard Labour fan Bill but as far as I am concerned the jury is well and truly still out.
on 29 October, 2008 at 9:19 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If Turnbull was PM you would lambast him for what he was/not doing. It just depends on which side of the fence you sit are on. Surely after all these years as a political commentator you should look at our politics as a game of tennis with the incumbents having most/all of the serves and in your case a slightly biased referee. What do you imagine the role of the opposition and how has it changed since they ditched the last bloke?
I voted for Mr Rudd for other reasons than to repeal workchoices and say sorry to the stolen generation and he should get on wih it.
Capitalism may well have failed us again, but the alternatives have never come close to providing the lifestyles we still enjoy.
on 29 October, 2008 at 9:21 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Yes Malcolm Turnbull’s behavior has been opportunistic and clown-like. But even worse is the silence of the two local Liberal MPs Alex Somlyay (Fairfax) and Peter Slipper (Fisher).

Confronted with an extraordinary world financial/economic crisis, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan acted early and decisively. They took decisive action to keep cash circulating with a $10.4b stimulus package to income groups likely to spend the money on necessities. They are accelerating infrastructure spending through a bring-forward of the Infrastructure Australia funding to generate medium and longer term productivity gains. They boosted the First Home Owners grant. They are taking a number of initiatives to support small businesses as well.

Further initiatives and adjustments will be made on the basis of the best advice available from the independent regulators.

Turnbull has overplayed his hand in an effort to make his ‘merchant banker’ background look relevant. You expect that sort of attention-seeking behavior in his job.

But where are the voices of concern from Somlyay and Slipper who were re-elected on the coat-tails of the Howard regime which gave us spiraling asset inflation and successive interest rate rises to arrest the underlying inflation?

What can they do to boost the confidence of Sunshine Coast people and businesses? Do they support the Rudd/Swan initiatives and do they support the independent regulator? Or do they support Turnbull’s undermining of the independent regulator’s role with irresponsible pot-shots? What infrastructure projects are they pushing for the Sunshine Coast? The silence is deafening

Cheers
Cr Debbie Blumel
on 29 October, 2008 at 10:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Malcolm Turnbull's talent for concocting a plausible case out of thin air may impress Liberal zealots, but the act is wearing thin with everyone else. Nothing says "arrogance" like the antics of the Born-to-Rule Party when it's out of office.

They have nothing to be arrogant about though, now that the prosperity bubble the former government brazenly claimed the credit for has burst.

The Coast's two Federal MPs are both Liberals, but they have been invisible throughout this crisis. Our volatile local economy is vulnerable to losses of jobs in retail, tourism and construction in particular, but they are not taking any initiative.

Bill Hoffman is wrong about a global economic crisis not being a political opportunity, at least to this extent: Messrs Somlyay and Slipper should be vigorously putting forward their constituents ideas to our homegrown Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan for pump-priming infrastructure projects on the Coast.
on 29 October, 2008 at 11:34 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well said Bill Hoffman.
Not only is Malcolm Turnball not part of the solution, he is part of the problem. The Australian reports this morning that Turnball joined the rush from APN Property for Income Fund number 2, just before it froze redemptions. Having basked in the higher returns for years he has probably parked the money in a bank with lower returns, to take advantage of the bank deposit guarantee. It is widely acknowledged by experts that Rudd had to adopt this policy in the face of bank guarantees given by overseas govenments, to avoid a run on our banks and consequential bank failures.

The current financial crisis illustrates the abject failure of extreme capitalism as espoused by Milton Freidman (Naomi Klein in her book Disaster Capitalism has already illustrated the failure of Freidmanite economic ideology in various countries of South America where it was first imposed).
Some of these 'economic rationalists' are still saying that the markets should be allowed to fail without interference by govenments - regardless of the impact on society and citizens.
The days of economic survival of the fittest are over and Rudd and Swan's capitalism with a social and environmental conscience is a welcome change.

The local federal members, Slipper and Somylay were irrelevant when Howard was in power. They are doubly so now. The Sunshine Coast remains a political backwater by continuing to elect them.

Sue_C
on 29 October, 2008 at 7:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
'The man is attempting to create an impression that only the Coalition has the skills to manage the economy.'

Smoke and mirrors as we are now finding out. Nothing more than a 'hollow gram'.

The economy grew because China and India wanted what we had but the previous govt failed to MANAGE the economy. The rich got richer and more people got to be poor.

I'd still give him an early mark though......
on 29 October, 2008 at 9:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Turnbull....a Merchant Banker. Hang on , these are the very same idiots that started this whole mess. If Turnbull had any sense the last thing he should be crowing about is his credentials.
on 31 October, 2008 at 3:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Had a laugh at the comments from Sorbent from West woombye. Now and then you get these wonderful co-incidences where peoples names reflect their occupation.

In this instance the quality of thought process is definitely reflected in the name...haven't read so much S*** for months!

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive