Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
11:49PM Wednesday 07 January, 2009
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Bill Hoffman Whether taking on developers hell-bent on destroying the Coast’s natural appeal or a Prime Minister indifferent to the plight of the poor, Bill Hoffman has never been one to mince his words. Bill’s been a journalist for 32 years, 29 of those on the Coast. Love him or hate him, he'll get you blogging.

Bligh's targets look impressive

September 10 | Bill Hoffman

Premier Anna Bligh’s brave new world may already have been dismissed as pure spin by the Opposition and some commentators.

The detail of how she will achieve the targets she set out on Monday as part of her Q2 vision statement, and the detail of the targets themselves, will be the test of that judgement.

Most interesting is her target of a 33% reduction in Queensland’s household carbon footprint by 2020.

Some of the nation’s top climate experts have already dismissed federal government greenhouse adviser Ross Garnaut’s passive approach which accepts the loss of the Great Barrier Reef and Murray River communities, calling for more aggressive short-term emission reduction.

Dr Bill Hare, who has tenure at the Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, believes the consequences of Garnaut’s 10% emissions target by 2020 falls well short of the 25 to 40% reduction needed to avert a devastating three-degree rise in temperatures.

He is backed by Melbourne University’s professor David Karoly who says the target should be at least 20% or Australia would effectively abandon any claim to leadership on greenhouse emissions.

Anna Bligh’s target looks impressive. It is not.

Targetted are the 13.77 tonnes of household carbon emissions produced by each household each year which, while significant, represent only a small proportion of total emissions.

A Sunshine Coast Council report on the federal government’s carbon pollution reduction scheme, presented to councilors on Monday, points out stationary energy emissions from the electricity generation sector contribute 50% of Australia’s greenhouse gases.

While individual emission reduction is essential, so too is a reduction in our reliance on fossil-fueled electricity generation.

Powerline Action Group Eumundi took that argument to state mines and energy minister Geoff Wilson recently in a submission opposing the roll out of high voltage lines.

The lobby group says the massive capital investment involved in the powerline roll-out ties Queensland into the future to a polluting non-renewable resource.

The minister has promised to look at the argument but has previously made it clear that the government was not letting go of its dependence on coal as both the font of the state’s wealth and a source of power.

He says that coal emissions can and will be cleaned up.

“That’s why we’re injecting $10 million into an oxy-fuel project being developed by CS Energy near Biloela in Central Queensland,’’ Mr Wilson said in a statement earlier this year.

“The project involves using a conventional power station and burning the coal in pure oxygen – which makes it easier to capture the carbon dioxide. It’s expected to demonstrate that coal-fired power stations can be retro-fitted with this technology to achieve deep cuts to carbon emissions. That’s important in a state with more than 32 billion tonnes of high-quality, low-cost, easily-accessible, black coal.’’

No timetable has been given for the roll out of this new technology, if it actually works, nor does it appear that there is a fall back position.

Sunshine Coast Council was elected on a platform of making the region an Australian model for sustainability. That aspiration is unachievable without the support of all levels of government.

Unless both the federal and state governments accept the need for fundamental change, and unless leaders emerge with the capacity to take the nation down a path to a sustainable future, whatever the short-term pain, then the future looks bleak indeed.

It’s a lesson that young rev heads learn every day of the week. You can get away with driving a car with reckless abandon for only so long.

Eventually comes the tearing sound of metal on metal and by then it is way past too late to wish you had listened.

Scientists have been warning about the impacts of climate change for at least the past 40 years.

The world as we know it has been imperiled by our refusal to listen. In a very real sense we are still not listening and our politicians are still not leading.

The consequences of that will escape many. The price will be worn by the young and those not yet born, a wonderful legacy for us to have left.

Anna Bligh’s plan to increase the quality of access to early childhood education for the state’s pre-schoolers is a noble ambition.

Perhaps that will better equip them to deal with the mess of our own stupidity’s making.

Recent Comments

on 10 September, 2008 at 3:06 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bill, I think that most of us have been around long enough to know that these lists of objectives from either side of politics are just electioneering stunts. We do have an election scheduled for next year.

I prefer to look at who is making the promises and what the odds are that they will actually carry them out. What is their track record? I am still trying to come to terms with the Government's performance against their two key Amalgamation objectives - Saving us money and giving us stronger councils.

Why do our pollies wait for an election before they start promising to do all the things which they should have been doing for the past 10 years.
on 10 September, 2008 at 8:06 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
What Bill has ungenerously interpreted here is the Premier's media release announcing an objective of "cutting Queenslanders carbon footprint by one third with reduced car and electricity use" by 2020.

Bill asks us to believe that this is specifically a target for households, and that cutting back on household electricity consumption is irrelevant if "stationary energy emissions from the electricity generation sector contribute 50% of Australia’s greenhouse gases".

It's the same electricity, whether you measure its carbon footprint at the point of production or the point of consumption.
on 10 September, 2008 at 10:22 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bill,

Well stated. This is classic spin and not backed up by real policy changes or on the ground facts - its business as usual for the Bligh Government, the coal and energy industries. The question that needs to be asked is how is the current expansion of coal fired power generation and transmission infrastructure going to meet any target to reduce Greenhouse pollution at all?

All of the eggs are in one basket - "clean coal". Most indications are that this technology will not be commercially available for another 20 years and will still have high costs and major technical difficulties in transportation and storage. Time to level the playing field and increase the chances of success by having a balanced portfolio of funding across the different energy technologies (including reducing demand) to solve the problem.
on 10 September, 2008 at 1:48 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Criticism for the pure sake of criticism.
Spare us from spins comments, ‘It's the same electricity, whether you measure its carbon footprint at the point of production or the point of consumption.’

But if you consume less electricity at the point of consumption, you will therefore need to reduce the amount of electricity generated, therefore you will be reducing your carbon footprint!
It’s not rocket science. You do understand what ‘Earth Hour’ was about don’t you?
Turn off the power if its not needed and thereby reduce the Generation of electricity needed, thereby reducing the Carbon footprint.
At least something is being done unlike John Howard & Lawrence Springborg who simply still do not believe in Global Warming.

Sorry to pour more cold water on this one sided debate, but some of the facts that answer the above are;
Coal Seam GAS is going to be one of this States biggest exports in the future. Coal seam GAS is so much more environmentally friendly than other carbon fossil fuels.
A percentage of Coal seam GAS must be used in any new Qld Electricity Generating plants. History will show your local Liberals and Nations voted AGAINST this law that mandated Coal seam GAS.
Due to these horrible socialists (Labour) mandating the use of Coal seam GAS in Qld it has become a $ multi billion export industry for the future.

I don’t know if you ran the story in the Daily but the competition did,
www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,2373...

‘QUEENSLAND could become a global energy hub with US giant ConocoPhillips pledging up to $9.6b for a half-share in a liquified natural gas project.’


AM
Buddina.

Ed: See the daily story at http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2008/sep...
on 12 September, 2008 at 10:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Cheapest way to save electricity at no cost to the Goverment or anyone else is Daylight Saving. Nana Bligh and Blockhead Borg are totally opposed to that against the will of the majority of Queenslanders . Our State Political leaders have have low intelligence , no talent and no common sense but are very good at being bloody minded .

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive