Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
3:32AM Saturday 26 July, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly sunny min 9° - max 20°
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Couch Potato Go channel surfing with our rotating panel of couch potatoes as they share their views on the good, the bad and the ugly on our TV screens. We want to know what you think too, so sink into the sofa and share your comments.

Flight of the Conchords crashes

May 14 | our TV junkies

I think I’ve missed the joke.

The Flight of the Conchords is the name of a New Zealand comedy duo – Bret McKenzie and Jemaine Clement – who have now been given their own self-titled show (10pm, Sundays, Channel Ten).

Renowned US network HBO, which gave us such TV gold as Sex and the City and The Sopranos, picked up this 12-ep series and has apparently commissioned a second.

This Kiwi double act has won award after award for its live appearances at comedy festivals and events; it has a cult following around the world and even won a Grammy in February for Best Comedy Album.

Such high praise and, yet, how misguided.

To me, they are about as funny as the unfortunate scheduling of that chocolate milk ad where the guy deliberately hurls himself into a tornado for the adrenalin rush at the same time as horrific scenes of devastation flooded our newscasts when Cyclone Nargis flattened Burma.

The TV show is supposedly about a couple of losers trying to make a success out of their folk/pop band while living in New York.

The two leads bumble through their lines with a maudlin and monotone humdrumminess that I imagine is akin to the white noise they torture prisoners with.

I can see that they might have an appeal, but how on earth that appeal stretched past Beavis and Butthead-styled male university second-years who subsist exclusively on beer and baked beans to the Grammy voters et al shall forever remain a mystery.

Here’s an example of their “humour” taken from their official website: “Flight of the Conchords have put up a website on the internet. A spokesman from the band (Bret) said it there was a five-year delay launching the website online due to a 'disagreement'. Apparently there was debate over how many times the letter 'W' should appear in the 'WWW' part of the web address. While Bret wanted four, making the domain name wwww.conchords.co.nz Jemaine was vying for seven, with wwwwwww.conchords.co.nz. It turns out that you're only allowed three anyway.”

If you are chuckling now, probably best you click out of this blog now.

I mean, am I getting old? Is this supposedly modern and edgy comedy? Am I missing something here??

I intensely dislike The Flight of the Conchords because:

It is cringeworthy, unfunny, boring and aimless.

The groan-versus-chuckle ratio is seriously skewed - as in, there are more groans, on average, than laughs.

It takes too long to arrive at a perceived punchline, at which point the viewer (namely, me) realizes with endless frustration and discontent that said punchline was most definitely NOT worth trawling through all that crap dialogue for.

Props, production values, acting, writing, direction … all summed up in one word: dodgy.

It makes use of surely one of the most annoying devices in television production: the sudden burst into song in the middle of a scene, complete with disco lights and mood music. It worked in Fame, but it doesn’t here.

I am disappointed by the fact that these guys haven’t bothered being creative enough to put any effort into their show title.

And if you market yourselves with the word “folk” in your act description, then you’d better be moaning about somethin’ blowin’ in the wind, peace trains or paving paradise in my book, thank you very much.

I’m even slightly annoyed by the blatant discrimination and omission of the letters T and R in the offending Christian names of both guys (Bret and Jemaine – come on!)

Alright, now I’m getting picky. But tune in, if you dare, and check it out for yourselves.

I guarantee you will be disappointed.

- REBECCA MARSHALL

Recent Comments

on 14 May, 2008 at 3:23 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
No offence, I'm not sure you are the target market, if you think you are too old, you probably are. Do you like anything on HBO? This stuff is aimed at off beat humour, understatement and a lack of polish.

If you don't like the way their names are spelled, you are a xenophobe. If you pick something stupid off their webpage, rather than talk about more of their album, you haven't done your research. Give it another go.. maybe
on 14 May, 2008 at 4:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Thought it was hilarious!
on 14 May, 2008 at 5:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Sweet lord, this show couldn't have sailed over your head any higher..
on 15 May, 2008 at 9:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It's sad that you don't understand irony. Come to think of it, humour too. Are you sure you're not a politician in disguise?
on 16 May, 2008 at 7:46 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The first sentence says it all. Yes, she did miss the joke. But that's okay, because, as one of the other commenters posted, it's off-beat humour, and is not meant for everyone. While I personally love FOTC, I doubt that my parents' generation would enjoy it as much as I do, so maybe age also has something to do with it.
on 20 May, 2008 at 4:35 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
This show is hilarious, but in a cleverly subtle, laidback kind of way. Go watch the wacky antics of the office, or scrubs (both good shows) if you want in-your-face humour, you've totally missed the mark. Your remark about their names is just scraping the barrel.
on 21 May, 2008 at 1:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Really? Fame was better than Flight of the Conchords? Find a sense of humor, lady.
on 24 May, 2008 at 5:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Perhaps Masterpiece Theatre would be more your cup of tea.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive