Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
8:50AM Tuesday 02 December, 2008
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Couch Potato Go channel surfing with our rotating panel of couch potatoes as they share their views on the good, the bad and the ugly on our TV screens. We want to know what you think too, so sink into the sofa and share your comments.

Aussie Top Gear a lemon

September 30 | our TV junkies

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then those British Top Gear geezers would no doubt be blushing like Jesuit nuns at a Sexpo.

Either that or they would be very confused at seeing carbon copies of themselves, albeit with Aussie accents, staring back at them from the screen.

The Australian version of that much-loved accidental hit Top Gear premiered on SBS last night (Mondays, 7.30pm) and, sadly, just like the Smith’s chips packets say: the original really is the best.

The hosts, firstly, are a risk.

Charlie Cox is self-assured, sarcastic and arrogant just like Jeremy Clarkson, but not in Jez’s likeable way.

Steve Pizzati is as jumpy and earnest as his alter ego Richard Hammond and Warren Brown is full of geek and bad jokes, perfectly resembling his mirror image James May.

But as those of us know who have repeatedly taped over the same VHS, when you reproduce something, a little of the original quality shine is lost.

The Aussie three really battle to achieve a chemistry beyond the tired jibes over driving skills; they often talk over each other and don’t appear to enjoy each other’s company.

In fact, they don’t seem to enjoy much at all.

The thing I adore about the UK Top Gear is the hosting trio’s unabashed, jump-up-and-down enthusiasm when faced with the prospect of driving some of the most awe-inspiring machines ever built.

They regularly crack up laughing, shout with delight, grunt with ecstasy at lightning-fast gear changes, purr in quiet deference to masterful motoring engineering and woo hoo with the best of them when pushing engines/steering/tyres to their absolute limit – and all this from supposedly reserved Englishmen.

There was none of that last night and none of the larrikinism I would have expected. They are all a bit dorky, I’m afraid.

Lowlights were the celebrity appearance of Vince Colosimo (who Charlie refused to listen to, causing numerous awkward moments); the audience (were they actually alive or painted faces on chipboard – I couldn’t tell); and Warren’s segment based on the question: could a shark eat a car.

That’s right, could a shark eat a car.

What are you? Five years old?

What will you do next week, Warren? Hypothesise as to who would win a race between Han Solo in his Millennium Falcon and Roger Ramjet in his American Eagle Squadron fighter jet? The Batmobile versus KITT from Knight Rider? Come on.

The challenge, which saw the three guys in different “soft-roaders” (a Nissan X-Trail, Subaru Forester and Toyota Rav4) going off road from the snow to the sea, was good fun, I’ll admit. But did anyone win?

Where was the fanfare and bragging done by the winner? Where was the tension leading up to the finish line? Was there a finish line?

I must make mention of some of the most extraordinary editing I have ever seen in a TV show – most of it misplaced. The shark segment particularly rose to a maddening and chaotic crescendo of such ridiculously fast edits that my eyes hurt.

Also, the hosts were regularly caught on the wrong camera and yet other cameras were caught in shot as control room producers got a little Ritalin-fingered with their cues.

Do me a favour and cool that hand, Luke, and cut back on the methamphetamines, ok?

Hmm. So where to from here?

Our hosting trio need to relax. Get out and have a few beers together and tell tall tales about cars.

Film it, but promise me you’ll forget you are being filmed. Watch it back and aim for that every Monday night.

Get your audience involved, talk to them ... ask them what their favourite car is, what their first car was, why they like cars, how many they have ... anything, but talk to them!

Directors, watch the pace. It lurched from psychotic to trance-like between segments, making me feel like I was back in my 1981 Mazda 626, learning how to drive a manual.

Get rid of the script – ban the autocue – and wing it.

Apparently you all have some serious motoring knowledge between you. Trust it. Trust each other and bloody go for it!

– REBECCA MARSHALL

Recent Comments

on 1 October, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I thought the show was garbage, why not do a proper Austaralian car show, forget about copying the poms, they do Top Gear very well but this show is nothing but a very pale second rater.
on 1 October, 2008 at 1:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
No offence to australian media, but most of your shows are blatant rip offs of American TV, and most times you try to copy the personalities as well, its just how it works i guess.
on 1 October, 2008 at 4:52 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Goodness me aren't we quick to rubbish! Give them a chance! The UK Top Gear has been going for how long and this is the first episode here... I don't know about you but I can't say I am usually on top of the game on my first day on the job!
on 2 October, 2008 at 8:31 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I agree, it was total rubbish; why on earth did they try and copy the show, even to the looks of the presenters (though I did briefly think one of them was Dicko). The appeal of the UK show is, as the article stated, the enthusiasm, humour and sarcasm of the presenters. I'm pretty sure that the local show would never dare "rubbish" a car for instance. Why couldn't they have thought a bit outside the square, brought in a good satirical journalist or comedian, instead of just trying to find people who LOOK like the original presenters, but despite their scripts, do not resemble them in the most important way, ie. their humour.
on 2 October, 2008 at 11:18 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The first episodes of the UK Top Gear were horrid - in comparison to what they have become now. The boys used to speak over themselves and James May was very stiff when he was first introduced. It takes time. Give the show a chance, let them grow into their roles before rubbishing them. Of course it is a copy of the British show - that is what it is supposed to be - just with an Aussie flavour. I'm just grateful Grant Denyer wasn't involved. Or the guy who used to do Sale of the Century and then hosted the extended ad on channel nine for which ever car company paid the most.
Give Aussie Top Gear a chance - we are all so quick to judge!
on 2 October, 2008 at 1:10 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I missed the show so can't comment on it, but I'd like to point out some things about Top Gear UK.

TGUK has some of the highest production values of any TV show with only a fraction of what's shot making it into the final cut.
Clarkson has spent years cutting his teeth, co-hosting the original Top Gear, then hosting his own chat show. He was the main attaction of TGUK when it relaunched a few years ago whilst Hammond and May settled into their roles.
Don't forget also that TGUK is very very well funded. The BBC aren't short of a bob or two, and I believe their commercial arm, BBC Worldwide, has added to the fund by selling the show to the likes of SBS.

One of the hopes I'd had for the aussie show was that they wouldn't try and copy the original presenters and would instead find 3 presenters who genuinely bond with each other -- the mateship between the presenters is vital.

From the comments above, it sounds like the team behind the camera have as much to learn as those in front.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive