Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
2:40AM Thursday 08 January, 2009
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Girl Talk Each week, award-winning journalist Amy Remeikis brings the female perspective on sport, as only she can. Slightly off-beat, sometimes cynical, Amy takes a good look at the world of sport, sports stars and anything to do with bats, balls, tracks, stumps and pools – but with no jock straps in sight!

None of our cricketers bowl me over

November 13 | Amy Remeikis

One of my friends has decided to take an interest in cricket.

Which I would usually applaud, except her interest has nothing to do with the actual game.

No, her interest is squarely due to the men playing the game.

Or one man in particular.

Stuart Clark.

She thinks the New South Wales pace bowler make it worth sitting around watching men clad in whites stand around a field occasionally scaring off flocks of birds with a little red ball.

I disagree.

Firstly, I don’t think she has a chance.

I mean yes, she is gorgeous, but she is not blonde.

And I’m pretty sure that being blonde is a perquisite for becoming a WAG.

I think an appearance in some sort of women’s magazine, preferably in your bikini after almost stealing the husband of another WAG, is another useful, but not necessarily required, trait.

But my friend’s small infatuation with Sarfraz got me thinking about the distinct lack of talent in the Australian cricket team.

Obviously I don’t mean their talent with a bat and ball.

They get enough write-ups about that already.

But considering the good-looking women they pull, you would think they could offer some man candy while out on the field.

Yet not only is it very slim pickings – which is why I think anyone who is not completely unfortunate looking, like Stuart Clark, looks even better – they put their face and name to things which are distinctively unattractive, like hair treatments for balding men.

Oh be still my swooning heart!

Seriously.

Cricketers are like the anti-sportsmen.

They don’t seem to be particularly buff, are more famous to the non-sport-watching public for their drunken antics than the actual game they play and have no problem putting their names to things which are not even remotely sports orientated – baked beans, cigarette replacement products, beer and goodness knows what else!

I’m also pretty sure that it is the only sport in the world where if you are feeling a bit off, someone else can do the running for you.

They break play for dinner, tea and probably brunch, hold world records in drinking, don’t seem to have a lot of humbleness and have no problems with sledging the opposition.

They talk about their great rivalry with the mother land, then go and play for them in the winter.

They defend Shane Warne as an “all right bloke” cos he can throw a ball.

They dress up in deodorant cans for television ads.

They try and impersonate Richie Benaud (seriously, how is that man still alive) – and do a very, very bad job.

And to be honest, in the looks department, there is no Craig Wing, Chris Tarrant or Pat Rafter among them.

And they wonder why women start snoring during the summer.

Recent Comments

on 13 November, 2007 at 1:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Amy get a life, by the sounds of your concocted story you have no idea about the game of cricket, its history or its following. Your comments about them being anti-sportsmen is ridiculous - where oh where did you collect this dribble. From Womans Day? As for the title 'none of our cricketers bowl me over' don't worry about that as from your picture you probably wouldn't stand a chance with any of them let alone any of our state players!
on 13 November, 2007 at 1:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hope you were wearing a ballbox for that Madmax comment, Amy...
on 13 November, 2007 at 1:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Nasty, nasty, nasty Mr Madmax.
With fans like you it is no wonder the Australian cricket team has a bad name for being poor sports! Seriously
on 13 November, 2007 at 2:03 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
"None of the cricketers bowl me over". I'm sure the feeling is mutual.
BTW Australia's cricketers are some one of the fittest sports people in the country. I'd like to see you play a five day test and see how you hold up.
on 13 November, 2007 at 2:26 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hey Max, time for you to have a Coke and a smile, then perhaps visit the Benny Cousins medicine cabinet for some sedatives.
But I'm confused, when did a box gain balls?
on 13 November, 2007 at 2:34 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You need to settle down a touch there, Maxy Boy. No need for such rage. Having said that, I do disagree with Amy's claim that there are not many attractive Australian cricketers. What about Boof Lehmann, Big Merv and Richard Chee Quee?
on 13 November, 2007 at 2:38 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Some sort of miracle has happened. Despite the fact that the blind man cant see the picture of the stunning and wonderfully glam Amy Remeikis, he managed to use a keyboard to spray his brain dead words all over the screen. What is perhaps even more of a miracle is that madmax is able to string a sentence together. How about a round of applause for madmax for learning the advantages of opposable thumbs!
Meanwhile, I'm with Amy in that cricket is THE ugliest sport around, even the pugnacious faces of boxers are more appealing than the australian cricket team... and probably mad max
on 13 November, 2007 at 2:50 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Madmax you obviously haven't seen Amy in real life.
on 13 November, 2007 at 3:05 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Maybe Amy likes her guys looking like men rather than sailors in sailor suites. I'm so glad we are all different.
on 13 November, 2007 at 3:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
BillyBob - I doubt they are fitter than tennis players, runners, swimmers, footballers (of any code), divers, gymnists, archers and any other sport you care to mention. Look at some of our most famous - Boone, Warnie, Merv - not exactly cut from stone are they?
on 13 November, 2007 at 3:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm with boyfromoz (not literally). Remeikis is a a saucy minx.
on 13 November, 2007 at 4:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You obviously have absolutely no idea what you are commenting on. Andrew Symonds trains with the Brisbane Broncos in the winter and almost joined the club when his cricket career wasn't going well. Brett Lee, Mitchell Johnson, Mathew Hayden and Ricky Ponting are supremely fit - they would not be able to perform at the levels they do unless they were.

I played cricket at a A grade level about 10 years ago, I ran 10 kilometres every day, trained 3 times a week and worked worked 10 hour days as a tradie as well as playing both Saturdays and Sundays. I would have been as fit as any footballer or swimmer going around.

I can tell you that the game left with a multitude of injuries from the intensity of the cricket I played.

As I said you obviously have no idea about the game so how can you comment on the fitness required, all you do is sit in front of a computer screen and pass judgment.
on 14 November, 2007 at 9:01 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Im sorry, but isn't the main aim of cricket to run up and down a 3m patch of cement a few times, while the rest of the team sunbake? No wonder warnies a tank, its not exactly taxing. I get more exercise walking around the office.

Billy bob, you should have been playing for australia with that much exercise, clearly you were more into it than our professional teams.

Meanwhile, lay off Amy, she is hot and funny, therefore above all you cricket fan comments.
on 14 November, 2007 at 12:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ahem.

"I don't think she has a chance."

I would TOTALLY have a chance if he met me. And it was dark.
on 15 November, 2007 at 11:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Bizzy, the line of cricketers that are queuing outside your office suggests that you do, in fact, have quite a strong chance. But unfortunately they are all so fat and unfit no one can get past, so could you ask them to move.
on 16 November, 2007 at 9:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hey boyfromoz, are you sure the fat slobs lining up outside bizzy's office are actually cricketers, from your description they sound like your average office worker.

I believe those queuing outside Bizzy's office just make inane comments on the game, they don't actually play.
on 16 November, 2007 at 11:50 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm still intruiged by the use of "playing" and "sport" when referring to Cricket, because I don't see a lot of either happening, and I am subjected to it for 8 hours a day by my colleagues. There is a lot of important "commentry" and tricky animations.

And yes, I am quite confident the cue is made up of cricket players, one is wearing womens playboy underwear, the other has callouses on his thumbs from text messageing, the rest are married and hoping to cheat on their respective wives.

So that is enough evidence to call them cricketers and all round "good sports"
on 16 November, 2007 at 1:57 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Any time you want to learn about the game boyfromoz just contact me, We can go down the nets and I'll bowl a few overs at you. I'm a little older than when I was in my prime, but bring your brown underwear anyway.
I'm sure your just looking in a mirror when you describe this so called "cue". I might be a tradie but at least I can spell.
on 16 November, 2007 at 2:38 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I think I will quite happily live out the rest of my life without learning the game thanks, but the offer is tempting. Regardless, the brown jocks probably won't be necessary as I am still in my prime therefore still in control of all my bodily functions.
Thanks for picking up on the spelling error with cue/queue, but clearly none of us are infallible, apparently you're having problems with your spelling also.
on 16 November, 2007 at 3:30 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I knew you wouldn't take me up on my offer. I always suspected a lack of ticker would be the major stumbling block.
on 16 November, 2007 at 4:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Oh it's not for a lack of ticker, just generally prefer to pull my eyelashes out one by one, or stick bamboo shoots under my fingernails when I want to be bored.
on 18 November, 2007 at 7:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
You should be plucking your eyebrows and painting your fingernails.
on 19 November, 2007 at 9 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Oh puhlease!!! is that the BEST you can do, jeez, I was expecting a higher level of humour, but obviously I over-estimated the level of your intellect.

Although reading back over your drivel, it should have been clear much sooner.
on 19 November, 2007 at 1:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I think you'll find its "please" but this isn't the first time you've problems with your spelling is it. Learn to spell and then come back and comment about other people's intellect.

BTW I showed all my mates this comment and they reckon you got rolled. Get over it.
on 19 November, 2007 at 2:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Showed all your mates? The guy who lives at the end of the bar at the pub and four flies does not maketh a consensus. Although, I probably won't be losing much sleep over what your mates "reckon".
But keep trying.
on 19 November, 2007 at 5:27 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I think we need to agree to disagree. I don't drink so the pub comment really missed its mark. This has been fun but I must admit its starting to get infantile.


All the best boyfromoz.

- Great let's end it then - Editor
on 1 December, 2007 at 11:02 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
BillyBob... It was very amusing to read your comment:
"I'm sure your just looking in a mirror when you describe this so called "cue". I might be a tradie but at least I can spell."

Your: A possessive form of a personal pronoun.
You're: Contraction of the words "you are".
Example: "Your knowledge of cricket shows that you're a supporter of the Australian team."
Know the saying, "Those in glass houses..."?
on 4 December, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
yoyama.... It was very amusing to read your comment:

"Those in glass houses..."?

Those: Plural of that or what you say when you are talking about many things.
Example: "That mountain, those mountains" or "That person, those people".
How does the saying go? I believe its "Those people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones".

This rubbish is so pedantic and I really agonised over submitting this comment. None of us is perfect, Lets just move on people.
on 4 December, 2007 at 6:49 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
hehe... I agonised about posting too but thought why not! No worries mate, we'll all move on. Thanks Amy for starting an interesting topic that finished with a spelling & grammar lesson.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive