Each week, award-winning journalist Amy Remeikis brings the female perspective on sport, as only she can. Slightly off-beat, sometimes cynical, Amy takes a good look at the world of sport, sports stars and anything to do with bats, balls, tracks, stumps and pools – but with no jock straps in sight! None of our cricketers bowl me over
| Amy Remeikis
One of my friends has decided to take an interest in cricket.
Which I would usually applaud, except her interest has nothing to do with the actual game.
No, her interest is squarely due to the men playing the game.
Or one man in particular.
Stuart Clark.
She thinks the New South Wales pace bowler make it worth sitting around watching men clad in whites stand around a field occasionally scaring off flocks of birds with a little red ball.
I disagree.
Firstly, I don’t think she has a chance.
I mean yes, she is gorgeous, but she is not blonde.
And I’m pretty sure that being blonde is a perquisite for becoming a WAG.
I think an appearance in some sort of women’s magazine, preferably in your bikini after almost stealing the husband of another WAG, is another useful, but not necessarily required, trait.
But my friend’s small infatuation with Sarfraz got me thinking about the distinct lack of talent in the Australian cricket team.
Obviously I don’t mean their talent with a bat and ball.
They get enough write-ups about that already.
But considering the good-looking women they pull, you would think they could offer some man candy while out on the field.
Yet not only is it very slim pickings – which is why I think anyone who is not completely unfortunate looking, like Stuart Clark, looks even better – they put their face and name to things which are distinctively unattractive, like hair treatments for balding men.
Oh be still my swooning heart!
Seriously.
Cricketers are like the anti-sportsmen.
They don’t seem to be particularly buff, are more famous to the non-sport-watching public for their drunken antics than the actual game they play and have no problem putting their names to things which are not even remotely sports orientated – baked beans, cigarette replacement products, beer and goodness knows what else!
I’m also pretty sure that it is the only sport in the world where if you are feeling a bit off, someone else can do the running for you.
They break play for dinner, tea and probably brunch, hold world records in drinking, don’t seem to have a lot of humbleness and have no problems with sledging the opposition.
They talk about their great rivalry with the mother land, then go and play for them in the winter.
They defend Shane Warne as an “all right bloke” cos he can throw a ball.
They dress up in deodorant cans for television ads.
They try and impersonate Richie Benaud (seriously, how is that man still alive) – and do a very, very bad job.
And to be honest, in the looks department, there is no Craig Wing, Chris Tarrant or Pat Rafter among them.
And they wonder why women start snoring during the summer.




Not Registered? Quick registration and comment.



Recent Comments
With fans like you it is no wonder the Australian cricket team has a bad name for being poor sports! Seriously
BTW Australia's cricketers are some one of the fittest sports people in the country. I'd like to see you play a five day test and see how you hold up.
But I'm confused, when did a box gain balls?
Meanwhile, I'm with Amy in that cricket is THE ugliest sport around, even the pugnacious faces of boxers are more appealing than the australian cricket team... and probably mad max
I played cricket at a A grade level about 10 years ago, I ran 10 kilometres every day, trained 3 times a week and worked worked 10 hour days as a tradie as well as playing both Saturdays and Sundays. I would have been as fit as any footballer or swimmer going around.
I can tell you that the game left with a multitude of injuries from the intensity of the cricket I played.
As I said you obviously have no idea about the game so how can you comment on the fitness required, all you do is sit in front of a computer screen and pass judgment.
Billy bob, you should have been playing for australia with that much exercise, clearly you were more into it than our professional teams.
Meanwhile, lay off Amy, she is hot and funny, therefore above all you cricket fan comments.
"I don't think she has a chance."
I would TOTALLY have a chance if he met me. And it was dark.
I believe those queuing outside Bizzy's office just make inane comments on the game, they don't actually play.
And yes, I am quite confident the cue is made up of cricket players, one is wearing womens playboy underwear, the other has callouses on his thumbs from text messageing, the rest are married and hoping to cheat on their respective wives.
So that is enough evidence to call them cricketers and all round "good sports"
I'm sure your just looking in a mirror when you describe this so called "cue". I might be a tradie but at least I can spell.
Thanks for picking up on the spelling error with cue/queue, but clearly none of us are infallible, apparently you're having problems with your spelling also.
Although reading back over your drivel, it should have been clear much sooner.
BTW I showed all my mates this comment and they reckon you got rolled. Get over it.
But keep trying.
All the best boyfromoz.
- Great let's end it then - Editor
"I'm sure your just looking in a mirror when you describe this so called "cue". I might be a tradie but at least I can spell."
Your: A possessive form of a personal pronoun.
You're: Contraction of the words "you are".
Example: "Your knowledge of cricket shows that you're a supporter of the Australian team."
Know the saying, "Those in glass houses..."?
"Those in glass houses..."?
Those: Plural of that or what you say when you are talking about many things.
Example: "That mountain, those mountains" or "That person, those people".
How does the saying go? I believe its "Those people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones".
This rubbish is so pedantic and I really agonised over submitting this comment. None of us is perfect, Lets just move on people.