Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
6:42AM Thursday 08 January, 2009
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Girl Talk Each week, award-winning journalist Amy Remeikis brings the female perspective on sport, as only she can. Slightly off-beat, sometimes cynical, Amy takes a good look at the world of sport, sports stars and anything to do with bats, balls, tracks, stumps and pools – but with no jock straps in sight!

Who really cares about women's sport?

October 16 | Amy Remeikis

It looks like I have officially joined the sports team – I got my first complaint.

And – surprise, surprise – it had to do with soccer. Oh, I’m sorry, football.

Not just any football. Women’s football. As in the FIFA Women’s World Cup, which played out last month in China.

For the record, Germany won for the second time.

They beat Brazil.

Still with me?

I was afraid you might have nodded off there for a bit.

Cos the thing is, while I am all for supporting women’s sport and championing that bandwagon, no one really cares. Seriously.

It is sad and horrible and disgustingly inadequate, but it is the truth.

Because not enough people care, the networks don’t make it a priority to showcase, and because the networks don’t showcase the games, the sponsors don’t jump out of their skins to support the players, and because the sponsors don’t really support the girls, they have to struggle to make ends meet, meaning they don’t get to put as much effort into their game as they like – and the whole sorry cycle continues.

Don’t believe me?

When was the last time you went to a women’s game? Any game? (And your daughter’s netball carnival doesn’t really count.)

So Wendy, I’m sorry that I don’t write about women’s sport.

You need to hear about things in order to be able to write about them and sadly, you just don’t hear about the results that often.

Unless it is a 20-second voice-over tacked on to the end of a sports bulletin – which usually comes across as an afterthought.

I don’t agree with it, but it is just the way it is.

In fact, the only time I heard about the Women’s World Cup – other than Australia losing out and Germany’s ultimate victory – it didn’t exactly show the sport in a positive light.

Germany v Argentina, anyone?

Don’t remember it?

It made history.

Not in a good way – Germany flogged Argentina 11-nil.

It is the highest-scoring match in the Women’s World Cup history.

And for the round ball game, it was an embarrassment.

Would the Argentina officials ever send a men’s team that was that bad?

I think not.

Mostly because they would probably be afraid to return home.

Those fans tend to care a little too much about a game that revolves around kicking a ball.

Which kinda proves my point.

Because they didn’t blink about sending a team of amateur players to the World Cup.

Not that they really had a choice.

The country doesn’t even have a professional league for the gals to kick around in.

Which would kind of be like Australia sending a bunch of women who enjoy playing OzTag to play on the world stage against the big boys.

So if a football-mad country doesn’t worry about who it sends to the Women’s World Cup, then why is anyone else supposed to support it?

Yes, I know it is wrong.

And I think it is a disgrace that for a lot of women to be able to raise money to play the sport that they are damn good at, they have to take off their clothes and pose for naked calendars.

It’s fine if you have chosen to do that.

But if it is one of your only options, then you don’t have a lot of choice, do you?

I am but one woman.

Yet we make up about 51% of the world’s population.

So, if you want to hear more about women’s sport, then get out there and support it.

Sport is not a male-only domain.

But until more gals get over the “I’m just not interested, I’m just a girl” bandwagon, then they probably won’t be lining up to jump on the one heading to a women’s sporting match.

Recent Comments

on 16 October, 2007 at 6:54 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
When was the last time u went to a girl's game Amy?
on 16 October, 2007 at 8:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
It seems that 1,156,955 fans that attended the 2007 Women's World Cup didn't really care either. That's an average of 36,155 per game.

Or the 617,000 that tuned into SBS to watch the Matildas v Brazil quarter-final game, did they care?
on 18 October, 2007 at 2:27 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Are you an accountant Marc? Numbers can be fun, but when you consider that American college football drew around 47 million spectators last year across four divisions, the million or so at the world cup looks a little insignificant...
As for the quarter final match, I have a funny feeling that many of the 617,000 were simply waiting for China Blue to start at midnight...
But its not all bad - Wimbledon, for example, now gives men and women equal prizemoney.
That's progress for ya.
on 18 October, 2007 at 4:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
So Nathan what is the relevance of American college football to an article suggesting that media and fans don't care about womens sport?
on 18 October, 2007 at 4:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
the relevance is in the numbers - highlighting the popularity of male sport as compared to female sport, in terms of fan attendance.
47 million fans voted with their feet to watch college football. thats kids playing other kids.
one million did the same for the womens world cup. the absolute top level of the sport.
by my reckoning, that makes male sport 47 times more popular.
on 18 October, 2007 at 7:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You are comparing an international event with 16 teams that occurs every 4 years with a domestic event that occurs every year and has I am not sure how many teams?

A dumb, irelevant and meaningless comparison. Do the words 'apples' and 'oranges' mean anything?
on 19 October, 2007 at 9:35 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I like apples, especially granny smith apples. And apple cider is nice too. But I don't care much for apple and blackcurrent juice. As for oranges, I like the colour, but not the citrus fruit variety. Manadrins are much nicer, especially this time of year. PS, I agree with Nathan and Amy.
on 19 October, 2007 at 10:42 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Thats exactly what Im doing Marc.
A domestic competition that is on every single year still attracts that many fans, while the world cup, once every four years and an international event, can only manage one measly million.

All I want to highlight is the fact that the million people who turned out for the women's world cup is just a dribble in an ocean of sports fans.

Comparing apples and oranges is a dumb, irrelevant and meaningless comparison, because they are fruits, not sports.
on 19 October, 2007 at 4:04 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
So using your logic (sic) the average crowd at an American college football game is 47 times 36k which is 1.7 million. I don't think so!
on 21 October, 2007 at 1:34 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
hey? huh? lets agree to disagree - arguing on the internet is kinda like, well, womens sport - no one really cares aside from the people involved, and other than the proper female sports like foxy boxing, is pretty damned boring.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive