Sub Main Menu
news
sport
lifestyle
entertainment
business
property
2:37PM Wednesday 03 December, 2008
'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Law and Order Damon Locantro has made a name for himself on the Sunshine Coast defending people charged with breaking the law. His practice, Locantro Lawyers, specialises in criminal defence but also offers services to those facing action by a government department. Damon has 15 years experience in criminal law and was formerly a NSW prosecutor and member of the NSW Police Service.

Leave the bikies alone

August 22 | Damon Locantro

There is no law against a group of bikers coming to town.

The Rebels have decided their national run this year will include a visit to the Sunshine Coastincluding a function on Saturday night at Kunda Park.

Where do the police get off saying they are not wanted here and the police will do “everything we can to make it uncomfortable for them and we will watching their activities very closely”.

Perhaps the police can elaborate on the tactics planned to deliver this discomfort.

In my experience bikers are unfairly targeted.

I recall a case of three bikers I represented, who were facing speeding allegations.

The case was thrown out despite the police using two video cameras to capture this “speeding”.

Unfortunately for the police, the rest of the footage, not freely handed over as part of the evidence, revealed an officer saying “let’s follow these guys, they’ve done nothing wrong, yet!”

The cops followed them for 30 kilometres before alleging that all three of them were speeding for about five seconds on a bend.

In addition, the audio evidence in that footage produced to the court included one of the police lying to the other.

The big problem was their attitude towards bikers who were otherwise law abiding.

I have a few questions for the police:

1. What are these tactics?
2. Does Superintendent Hanbridge consider his remarks to be provocative and inflammatory?
3. What attitude will the police have towards the bikers this weekend, will it be guilty until proven innocent?

I think that any unfair targeting and holding an intention to deliberately make things uncomfortable is against the right that we have to move about this place freely and should make all of us feel uncomfortable.

Recent Comments

on 22 August, 2008 at 12:17 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Damon
You never cease to amaze me with your predictable and one eyed views. The Rebels are an "Outlaw Gang” I am sure none of them will be invited for a ride in your black BMW or to have dinner with your family over the weekend.

You must be aware that the Rebels OUTLAW motorcycle gang are the most organised drug dealers in this country. I dare say some of your clients who have succumbed to crime, owe their predicament to Rebels Drugs. These people are violent thugs. We want protection from them.

You continually use this blog to attack the police then petulantly deny you have a grudge.

It seems all you want is to get your name out there Damon.

Oh! By the way when channel seven wanted to interview after court the other day why did you run away, not good for the image I suspect.

At least be consistent, not that many of us want to hear more of your views.

You must be an embarrassment to your peer group, who as impartial officers of the court go about their business in an unbiased and professional manner.

You are just Locantroising through another opportunity to bag the police.

This community has the right to be and feel safe, that includes you and yours. Good on the police if it were not for their efforts the Rebels would have a free hand and they would take it.

Making the Rebels uncomfortable is an honourable pursuit.

God bless the men and women of the Queensland Police who will do there best to keep us safe from these criminals over the week end.

You should be ashamed of yourself!!
on 22 August, 2008 at 1:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Damon, you must be aware that these guys don't consider themselves as outlaw motorcycle GANGS. This is a term used freely by police and media. They are Motorcyle Clubs, that is what the MC stands for on their vests. You are just blindly believing media propaganda. SOME members are obviously law breakers, but definitely not ALL. Just as SOME police have been convicted of peadophilia, drugs, murder and corruption to name a few, to brand ALL police as drugdealing peadophiles would be ridiculous. As it is ridiculous to tar all club members with the same brush, when there are MANY, (and yes, I know them personally, have you ever met any?) who get up, go to work at normal jobs, raise families and live within the law. It is so unfair to the honest ones to suffer the slurs against them when they haven't done anything wrong. Can you honestly say that there are NO law breakers in your local football/golf/bowling club? If some members of your local social club or whatever were doing something wrong, how would you feel if YOU were branded as a criminal because you are a member of the same club as them? I accept that some bike club members have broken laws, but to assume that EVERYONE in that club is doing it too, or even has KNOWLEDGE of what each and every member is doing, is too far a stretch of the imagination. Most intelligence on bike club behaviour has come from American fiction books, and is not the reality. As Australian citizens, the Rebels and every other bike club,have the right to visit where they want. If individuals do the wrong thing, I'm sure the law will deal with them, but why should EVERY member suffer the consequences for the actions of the few.
on 22 August, 2008 at 2:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
My mistake, my previous comments were addressed to Vulcan.
Damon, I APPLAUD your article.
on 22 August, 2008 at 2:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I do take your point 'unbiased'. There seems to be a stinky stigma attached to the OMCG name, much the same as the 'profession' of lawyer.

'In my experience bikers are unfairly targeted.'

Your experience??? Your blurb says 'Damon has 15 years experience in criminal law and was formerly a NSW prosecutor and member of the NSW Police Service.'

What did you do? 6 mths as a prosecutor and 14 and a half years as a school based officer? Give me a break.

People, stop taking the bait. This blog is a hunting safari to round up publicity and 'fame'.
on 22 August, 2008 at 3:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Darknight you are spot on the money. Seriously Mr Locantro can't be stupid enough to keep on leading with his chin by writing contentious articles with bold headlines unless he is doing it deliberately. Why? To build his profile and business of course.

on 22 August, 2008 at 4:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Damon
As posted by vulcan "you never fail to amaze me". Do you not notice the word "gang" in morocycle gang?
These "people" intimidate" through numbers and have committed heinous crimes on persons. But I suppose you defended the bikie who bit off an ear or a finger and ignored the ex-bikie gang who so feared for his well-being that he committed suicide.

Of course you want these people in this town where you defend the likes of these scum. You can defend them when the inevitabel occurs when they AGAIN have wonton disregard for the law! You can line your pockets and coffers when they require bleeding heart representation in court.

Once again you bleeding heart fails to move me. They are not wanted here!

And as for the speeding fine, are you saying gang members should be immune from punishment under the law?
ASTONISHING- if you do the crime do the time.
on 22 August, 2008 at 4:35 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
What a bunch of whacky people we have here, with their heads firmly buried inside their own orifaces!

Damon Locantro you are absolutely right. These bikers - regardless of their intent - have every right to come to the Sunshine Coast, whether we want them here or not.

We in Australia live in a D.E.M.O.C.R.A.C.Y. where we still have the freedoms fought for by our forebears in so many theatres of war.

We don't have to like what people do. But in Our country they have a right to do it, within the bounds of law.

That they are coming to the Sunshine Coast does not, by default, imply they are coming here to deal in drugs, rape our buffalo or eat our women.

The are free (while maybe not "welcome")to visit here... the are part of Australia's great patchwork.

The police have absolutely no right to suggest they will make it 'uncomfortable' for any of our visitors. simply because they dont personally like bikies or their lifestyle.

Much has been made of the name 'OUTLAW' ... look at that word... it does not mean they are Illegal, they have not been Outlawed.. otherwise they'd have been rounded up every time they take off on a ride...

Are the police acting like this simply because its the weekend and they dont want to work?? Our police surely arent indicating that they don't want to do their job, are they ....,. ARE THEY??
on 22 August, 2008 at 4:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
continuing from my last comment that interrupted by a technology failure....

No we dont want these guys coming here causing problems, dealing drugs to our kinds, and making a general nuisance of themselves, but that is what the Police are for, to protect lives, property and uphold the law..

They are not here to judge if a person is 'good enough' to visit our region.

That is not Policing, that is dictatorial.

Im with you Damon .. you are right -- and you are right to express your views in this, great, free, fair nation of ours!
on 22 August, 2008 at 5:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Quite a bunch of narrow minded people here!
On what basis can any of you label ALL bike club members as SCUM?
As stated previously,( I noticed you've ignored MY comments), just because SOME are bad, how can you, in all good reasoning, say ALL are bad???
With your one eyed views, you then MUST, to agree with your OWN reasoning, brand ALL police as corrupt peadophiles!!!
You MUST brand all members of the church as peadophiles!!! You MUST (again, YOUR OWN reasoning!) brand all football club members as drug addicts!!!
Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?? Because it IS!

You are so brainwashed. You can't condemn a whole group of people for the actions of a few!!!

Of the bikers coming to town, I will bet my life that they are not ALL drug dealing scum, not even MOST of them. So stop branding them as such. It sickens me to see people so quick to judge people they don't even know!

I personally know several that go to work every day, go home to their families at night, and struggle to pay bills just like every other Aussie! They have no criminal records, go out of their way to help other people, are polite and are obviously far nicer people than some of the judgemental bigots on here!
on 23 August, 2008 at 2:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well done Damon! I completely agree with what you say. When I was a teenager on the coast if I even got in trouble the last people I could turn to were the police beacasue of corse being a teenager on the coast you were obviously tar with the same brush as all off the bad teenagers and not one ounce of help was offered your way, but it always seemed there was a friendly bikie around to help you out no matter how small the situation. Has nobody seen the charity runs the bikies do and no not ALL the money they help charities with is DIRTY money a lot of it is hard earned money, and even if it is dirty money isn't it better that they're not spending it on drugs or things to make their lives better and actually giving to people who need it. They might have a reputation of being 'bad' people but can you honestly tell me of someone who has never done anything wrong in their life? Just because they choose that way of life they shouldn't be stalked by police beacause of it. There are many unsoled crimes out there police could be solving instead of wasting valuable time and tax payings money following a lead that is going to go nowhere. Once again I commend you Damon, keep up the good work.
on 23 August, 2008 at 10:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs have been given such a label, because predominately the do engage in, or are linked to criminal activity, or is it just co-incidence each time?
Anyone who has had involvement with these groups knows the real story.
on 25 August, 2008 at 5:41 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
this doesn't make sense. why would damon call for the police to leave bikies alone - isn't that doing himself out of a job as a defence solicitor? surely the more trouble they get in, the more potential clients?
on 5 September, 2008 at 10:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Damon
As usual you pick a controversial issues and blow them way out of proportion in an attempt to self promote. I read your blogs as I find the feedback people give you a source of amusement.

Its blatantly obvious in your latest blog that you are pandering to your clients or at least throwing potential clients a "Ill be your best mate" pitch in an attempt to get the OMCG $$ to line your wallet.

I read darknights comment, "What did you do? 6 mths as a prosecutor and 14 and a half years as a school based officer? Give me a break." this comment interested me so I dug a little and note the Queensland law society web page has you admitted in 2002 which hardly equates to 15 years experience as a defence lawyer - very misleading Mr Locantro!

Further your web page states "Our lawyers are uniquely qualified having been serving Police Officers, Detectives and Prosecutors" As you are the only solicitor in the practice is this statement not also blatantly misleading or are we the public to assume that you are all those people rolled into one?

And the biggie... "We are among the most experienced defence law firms in Australia" and after only 6 years as an admitted solicitor ????

C'mon Damon with the garbage you continually post in these blogs that last comment borders on blatant deception.....

The biggest criminal law defence firms don’t have the time to write the drivel you do .....
on 6 September, 2008 at 8:50 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
newsblog from Coolum, i bet you would a different view if they started a club house near you and were making drugs. You are a goose.
on 9 September, 2008 at 11:33 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
'whatthea' , you are an ignorant individual, and everybody else responding to Damons article in the negative.... Do a bit of homework, its easy to do, and look up how many times the Rebels have been convicted in Queensland and compare it to how many times the police have been convicted of a criminal charge......you are going to get a jolt of reality. YOU ARE ALL PARANOID. WAKE UP!
on 11 September, 2008 at 7:39 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The ignorance of unbiased, notthenorm and darkknight is astounding. I worked with Damon in the cops for years and he was a smart street cop and an excellent police prosecutor however it seemed to me that a person with Damon’s intelligence and ability was always going to be held back in the public sector. The fact that Damon is an honours graduate in business and law and operates his own successful law firm provides fuel for jealous people who have not been asked to write articles on matters affecting law and order and instead spit vile venom at every opportunity.

Notthenorm, your ignorance is plain for all to see. You write, “which hardly equates to 15 years experience as a defence lawyer” If you simply read his profile you will see that it says that Damon has “15 years experience in criminal law”. I am glad you’re not a solicitor, you would be sent to prison for attempting to pervert the course of justice.
on 9 October, 2008 at 10:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
My goodness bigmuzz! Me unbiased? (I assume you meant to write biased) and your comments are not?

My reference to many years of "experience" was directed at the statement regarding having “many years experience in criminal law”,

Someone such as Mark “Chopper” Reid for example could boast he has a many years "experience in criminal law" if the statement is to be read as you put it.

Your comment "…. provides fuel for jealous people who have not been asked to write articles on matters affecting law and order " is surely a joke.

This Blog is more akin to a forum to express ones own person opinion rather than a source of unbiased legal discussion, as has been seen time and time again. This is obvious from the content of the many postings from the public who would obviously agree with me.

As for my ignorance, I note you failed to comment on any other of issues I raised. Care to comment on the last 4 paragraphs of my post?

Perverting the course of justice? ??? - and you are or were a policeman?
on 25 October, 2008 at 1:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
In response to Bigmuzz: You worked with Damon for "years" and he was a smart street cop and an excellent police prosecutor? His profile indicates that he joined the NSW police in 1993 and then in 1995 he was (rather rapidly, I'd suggest) promoted to Acting Sergeant, Prosecutions (which isn't actually a promotion, it's a secondment to a higher rank). He resigned and became a legal practitioner in 1998. That would suggest that, taking time out for his training at the Academy, he would have had, at the most, 18 months on the street before he went into Prosecutions. Someone seems to be telling porky pies. I'm wondering, is Bigmuzz a psuedonym for Damon Locantro? Regardless, I'm baffled how any educated person could argue that an OMCG like the Rebels are unfairly targeted. Surely, if Damon Locantro was a good street cop then he would have no doubt about the illegal, violent conduct of OMCG such as the Rebels. Or is it more a case of not wanting to upset prospective clients?
on 26 October, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Notthenorm, let’s keep this simple; I will break it up into points for you;

1) I am not calling you unbiased notthenorm. If you look closely you will see a little punctuation mark. This is called a comma. The comma is used for separating things like words. unbiased is the pseudonym used by someone else.

2) You write on 5 September, 2008 “which hardly equates to 15 years experience as a defence lawyer - very misleading Mr Locantro.” I write on 11 September, 2008 “If you simply read his profile you will see that it says that Damon has “15 years experience in criminal law”. You then write on 9 October 2008, my reference to many years of "experience" was directed at the statement regarding having “many years experience in criminal law”, You tried to change the meaning of a sentence by changing it completely. What your reference was directed too matters little if you get it wrong.

3) You say,” Someone such as Mark “Chopper” Reid for example could boast he has a many years "experience in criminal law" if the statement is to be read as you put it.” ‘Notthenorm’ this is a ridiculous hypothetical. I don’t think Mr Read will be holding himself out as a solicitor in the near future so who cares? Damon has 15 years experience in criminal law as a professional. Do you understand the obvious difference?

4) I wrote on 11 September, 2008 “provides fuel for jealous people who have not been asked to write articles on matters affecting law and order. You write on 9 October, 2008” This Blog is more akin to a forum to express ones own personal opinion rather than a source of unbiased legal discussion, as has been seen time and time again. This is obvious from the content of the many postings from the public who would obviously agree with me.”

What you obviously do not seem to understand and/or accept is without Damon’s blog there is no opinion for others to express. If you read some of the other "Daily 'writers', they also express their opinion exactly as Damon does. Every one is entitled to their opinion, however you have gone beyond expressing an opinion, you have moved down a slippery path of sweeping and misleading statements hiding behind a cloak of anonymity.

( Out of room - the rest to come)
on 26 October, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Part 2.......

5) You write on 5 September, 2008, "Further your web page states 'Our lawyers are uniquely qualified having been serving Police Officers, Detectives and Prosecutors' As you are the only solicitor in the practice is this statement not also blatantly misleading or are we the public to assume that you are all those people rolled into one?

I know for a fact that since Locantro Lawyers has been in operation, a number of solicitors have been employed by Damon, including former Officers. If you do some more “digging” Sherlock you may be able to find out.

6) You write on 5 September 2008, “And the biggie... "We are among the most experienced defence law firms in Australia" and after only 6 years as an admitted solicitor?

Experience is subjective. I have seen many defence solicitors who rarely attend court, and have never instructed in a trial. I can tell you that as a prosecutor and before I completed my law degree I was up against senior counsel and there was no excuse for poor performance. You must be on top of your brief and you must be skillful at what you do, so your digging means nothing ‘notthenorm’.

7) I assume the last paragraph was your little attempt at a rhetorical question. If it really means so much to you, then find out for yourself. You have proved that you have brilliant investigation skills by finding out how long some-one has been admitted.

Turning to dburriswriter...well well, another individual who does not read the detail or who chooses to ignore it. How many years are there between 1993 and 1998....um maybe five year(s)? See that "S" there dburris. I am quite happy to identify myself to you and I will send you my resume if you like. Damon obviously does not need to use pseudonyms. If you look at his second last blog you will see that he responds to Darknight, which was long overdue after Darknight's months of drivel and spite. I am a mate of Damon's yes, absolutely and I get annoyed when cowards attack him personally. So wonder away dburriswriter from Los Angeles? It will give your brain something to do. If you look back, you will see that my comments have nothing to do with OMCG's but about other people's ignorance in playing the man and not the ball.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive