Mark, editor-in-chief of the Sunshine Coast Daily, has been a journalist on the Coast for 20 years and is passionate about fighting for a better deal for the region. When he's not at work, he loves nothing more than spending time with his wife Julie and three kids. Developer bashing is our new sport
| Mark Furler
It seems we’ve created a new sport on the Sunshine Coast – developer bashing.
And judging by the number of letters to the editor and blogs on the subject, if it was set up professionally, there would be no trouble filling the proposed Stockland Stadium at Kawana week after week.
There’s even potential for a second division – property investor bashing – judging by the reaction of tenants to the prospect of landlords passing on the council’s proposed new rates charges to those renting.
Let’s face it, developers are an easy target, aren’t they?
They have more money than all of us, drive cars worth more than our homes and are the main reasons why we are all paying through the nose for housing on the Coast.
But I wonder if we’re all getting a little carried away with this latest sport.
In the past 20 years, I’ve seen plenty of developers make a good buck or two on the Coast.
But I’ve also seen quite a few of them give a lot back to our community – and on an ongoing basis.
And when it comes to housing affordability, some of them are just as passionate as the rest of us about trying to deliver solutions so that the next generation can afford to live here.
You only have to look at the likes of the Reed family to see there are people who give back into the community in a big way.
The Reed Charity Foundation has helped raise money for an accommodation facility at Nambour General Hospital; an orphanage in India; a fully equipped therapy pool for Currimundi Special Pool; the Sunshine Coast Hear and Say Centre; as well as helping Nambour’s Sunshine Coast Children’s Therapy Centre.
The Reed Charity Ball, held last Friday night, is one of the biggest social events of the year – and one of the biggest money spinners for worthy causes.
This year, funds will contribute to Family Challenge – an organisation which is really making a difference in helping parents be better parents – as well as tackling one of the biggest humanitarian crises the world has seen in northern Uganda.
There an estimated 35,000 children were kidnapped and turned into soldiers by the Lord’s Resistance Army. It will take years to lead them back to living normal, meaningful lives.
It’s an enormous job but one that Coast clinical psychologist Dr Robi Sonderegger is meeting head-on with the support of big-hearted business people from the Coast and beyond.
While critics will no doubt say that the development industry should be giving back – after all they are making enough money – the reality is they are there to make money to gain a return for their investors – as well as building their own family’s future.
It is no different from people who work long hours to earn enough to afford to buy an investment property.
They make sacrifices in order to “get ahead” – to try to set up a future for their retirement which will mean they don’t have to rely on the pension – or the taxpayer – to sustain them in their final years.
And yet like developers, they are easily targeted as being ‘greedy’, speculative or pushing up housing prices for the rest of us.
In some cases, that well may be true, but there are plenty of examples where our “greedy” property investors are in fact just mum and dads trying to get ahead, to provide a future for their own kids.
At the end of the day, continual conflict between the so-called haves and have nots achieves little.
If we are to achieve anything on the Sunshine Coast – especially under this big, unwieldly regional council imposed upon us all – we have to work together.
The council needs to be sitting down with the development industry and the wider community to come up with realistic and achievable solutions to the Coast’s housing crisis.
While there will always be developers interested in only making a quick buck, the better ones – those who have been around for a long time on the Coast and have been supporting a lot of community causes along the way – have the will and determination to deliver on housing affordability.
But the council – together with the State Government – needs to provide the environment and the goodwill to give those players a go.
At the end of the day, whether we like it or not, solutions on more affordable housing are far more likely to come out of the brains trust of private industry than from bureaucracies or government organisations.
The new council has made a clear commitment to affordable housing, along with sustainable development.
With proper levels of dialogue between council and industry, there is no reason why both can’t be achieved.
But as a community, we can expect nothing but more strife and division if we foster a “them and us” culture which pits one against another.




Not Registered? Quick registration and comment.





Recent Comments
The best thing for the community is for everyone to simply take what they need and leave something for the nexy guy.
There's a saying Mark, 'smart for one- dumb for all'.
Perfectly apt in this case.
By the way, I'm a have. I'm simply against using financial tricks to take advantage of the have-nots.
Or positions of trust to push a barrow.
- I didn't expect to be overwhelmed with support for this piece - sometimes what a journalist does if present the 'other side' of the story - it's not always popular - but heh, that's what having your say is all about - MF
We do have this developer bashing mentality and sometimes it is deserved and most times not. From all the blogs and comments I see it would appear anyone who owns more than one property or builds more than one is a developer. Now from all those who comment how many live in a house or apartment? Who built it? Who developed the land? If it was not yourself then you purchased it off a developer and therefore you are the end user and therefore the driving force behind the demand and therefore it is your fault.
How stupid you say? Well not really because the one thing we all agree on is that supply drives demand so until the supply is in over-supply then there will always be profit for anyone who builds and sells something. But go into over-supply and it won't get produced because there is no profit resulting in limited supply which in turns increases demand. Back to square one.
We all want something and expect it at the least possible cost but expect someone else to pay a premium price elsewhere so we get ours cheap. Developers just work in bigger dollars however the same principle applies to anything. Look at video game consoles, the latest comes out at $500+ and demand is so high there are back orders but then 1 year later the same console is $200. Why? Supply & demand. I don't seem to hear anyone bashing those companies as they drip feed supply in order to get higher prices.
Until an alternative supplier of the product, in this case housing comes into the market then we have private or publicly listed developers and they by right as a business are expected to make a profit. Now until council or government gets into the housing development business we work with, rather than bash, the only supplier we have.
I think you'll find that everyone will always bash the companies trying to profiteer off the back of people's needs, whereas the wants are fair game.
It's actually a rather reasonable viewpoint if you think about it.
And, I think we're all past the argument of what we'd do without the mighty developer/investor.
I think I'd be right with a hammer thankyou.
There might be something to be said for letting the supply run out on the Coast. I am not convinced that this will drive the prices up. I think that what may happen is that the demand will dry up along with the supply. Certainly the demand from migrants into the Coast would dry up. It might leave some room for locals to buy some property.
But of course, this would be an absolute disaster for our developers and real estate agents who Mark thinks that we are unfairly poking fun at.
I think that we need to stop blindly trying to apply the supply/demand argument to the Coast and come up with a more innovative approaches to managing our property market...particularly "affordable housing".
May be something to do with the amount of "developer" dollars put into advertising in the esteemed rag...
Like WWJD said, to give after receiving (and in this case receiving loads) is not really giving. I admire the giving of Reed, it is good to hear.
But they are a minority arent they?
The frustrating part on my behalf Mark, is that it is getting harder, and harder and harder to afford your own home and yet like you point out there are people there (investors/developers) who are living it up while others flounder. Yet we are supposed to forgive them their affluence because they hold a ball to raise funds for charity?
While I am on my soapbox, why dont Reed give to the poor of Australia? Why not help develop lots at a lower price to benefit those who are struggling to buy or even find a place to live?
S