'Blogs Central
Blog Central: Mark My Words Mark, editor-in-chief of the Sunshine Coast Daily, has been a journalist on the Coast for 20 years and is passionate about fighting for a better deal for the region. When he's not at work, he loves nothing more than spending time with his wife Julie and three kids.

Who's who in the election zoo

March 11 | Mark Furler

The real tragedy of compulsory voting is that too many Sunshine Coast voters will go to the polls on Saturday with not a clue as to which division they are in – let alone what their local candidates stand for.

While the Daily has been running a series for more than a week giving information on local candidates, and thedaily.com.au has a comprehensive guide online, too many voters can’t be bothered to find out who’s who in the zoo until after it’s too late.

It’s a pity, because of all levels of government, local councils have the biggest potential to really stuff up your life. In other words, it pays to do your homework.

In the interests of informing residents – and stirring up as many enemies as I can – here’s my form guide to the Sunshine Coast election race.

Mayor: Bob Abbot v Joe Natoli. Bob Abbot is likely to win Saturday’s election based on current polls, but it’s my view that Joe Natoli is being tarred a little too heavily with the developers’ brush by his critics. Both, surrounded by a good team, will make good mayors. If you want a greener Coast, pick Bob. If housing affordability is an issue, Joe might be a better choice.

Division 1: Anna Grosskreutz looks the most impressive to me here, although Steve Attrill, a former Suncorp financial planner, would bring some much-needed business nous to the super-council table.

Division 2: On my reading of it, it should be a pretty close race between high-profile sitting councillor Tim Dwyer and former policeman Ron Strong. Ron has been involved in numerous community and ratepayer groups in recent years, and has certainly lifted his profile.

Division 3: There’s a reasonably strong line-up in this division, with high-profile rugby league dad Danny McGuire (father of Casey) up against sitting councillors Gordon Wallace and Danny O’Kearney, former Labor MP Chris Cummins and impressive green candidate Keryn Jones. My pick would be Keryn, because I think she has youth and enthusiasm on her side.

Division 4: This is likely to be a two-way battle between two reasonably strong councillors – Caloundra’s Andrew Champion and Maroochy’s Chris Thompson. Cr Champion has certainly lost some support in the crucial Buddina area after being a little too pro-development for residents’ liking, while Chris Thompson may struggle to be recognised outside of Maroochy. My pick would have to Champion.

Division 5: Jenny McKay has been one of the true shining lights of local government in the time I have watched her. She has had a passion for her Palmwoods community that started well before she entered the political fray. “Pick and shovel” man Ron Green is certainly one of the more colourful characters running.

Division 6: As the editor of thedaily.com.au, surely I’d have to endorse Tom Hulett just to keep my blog traffic running, wouldn’t I! Tom knows how to stir people up and he certainly made few friends trying to blog his way out of claims he bullied young Christian Dickson.

Division 7: I’ve never been overly impressed by the “intellectual rigour” (as Tom would say) of Ted Hungerford, to be honest, so my choice would have to be between former journalists Lachlan Millar and Ken O’Flaherty. As the founder of the Buderim Chronicle, O’Flaherty knows local issues better than most.

Division 8: This is one of the more interesting divisions, with sitting councillor Tony Northey, now famous for accepting gifts from Lend Lease, up against serial ALP candidate Debbie Blumel and taxi owner/driver Jeff Watson. Out of the three, Watson, who used to work for Maroochy, has been the most impressive for me.

Division 9: Vivien Griffin is probably the stand-out candidate here in terms of media profile, but her decision to quit Noosa Council when she didn’t get her own way won’t go down well with some voters. Ross Duncan, as a business consultant, may be handy on the reform front.

Division 10: Aboriginal elder Anthony Beezley would be my pick here. He’s a big bloke with a big heart, and it would be nice to think the first Sunshine Coast council had someone to represent our original inhabitants.

Division 11: I think former Noosa News journalist Frank Wilkie made a bad mistake in deciding to run in this division, given he’s up against high-profile Noosa councillor Russell Green. Cr Green will be crucial to the new council in planning to ensure a good balance is struck between development and the environment.

Division 12: There’s a good line-up of candidates here, with Brian Lindfield well known for his work in establishing a facility for the disabled at Doonan. Lew Brennan, a former brickie, has had 11 years on Noosa Council, while Biggest Loser contestant John Morrall (no, he’s not as grumpy as he came across in the show) is certainly worth a look.

But don’t take my word for it, check out the candidates for yourself on thedaily.com.au’s election guide and please make an informed decision.

Remember, we’re stuck with these people for four years.

Recent Comments

on 11 March, 2008 at 6:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Nice list Mark. But you know that you have not really made a pick in some Divisions.

I believe that OSCAR also has a very similar list. However, there are some differences.

- Here is the link to that list Atapro

http://www.scec.org.au/index.php?option=...

My list isn't intended to tell people who to vote for as such but rather be a guide to the top contenders. I think people need to make their own minds up - based on information. There's plenty of it on our election guide page - including many bloggers comments which give an 'unofficial' insight into candidates as well. - Editor
on 11 March, 2008 at 7:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
In Division 12 Aaron White appears to be worth a look, though it's a tough choice in this division he is the only candidate that appears to be running with local environmental concerns at the forefront and is the top pick for OSCAR.
on 11 March, 2008 at 7:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Thank you for the vote of confidence Mark... I really appreciate your kind words.

Jeff Watson.
Candidate for Division 8
"Power to the People"
www.jeffwatson.com.au
on 11 March, 2008 at 7:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Mark: That link is for SCEC's web site. SCEC is only one of the many community organisations represented by OSCAR as far as I know.

The link which we were given in yesterday's blogs was for OSCAR itself: www.ausaccom.biz/oscar

But I have to agree that SCEC's version of the list is a lot easier to read than OSCAR's.

- It also came up higher in Google - Editor
on 11 March, 2008 at 8:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Not a bad list Mark however you have left Div 6 short by not speaking about the alternatives to Tom & Christian. As I have stated before Lucretia Wheeler is the most highly qualified candidate there & yet I don’t think you have given as much attention to this as you have the "face off" between 2 other candidates. Even in your article you fail to mention the alternatives.

Also you or one of your reporters may wish to do some investigation on this,

1) Is it true the Liberal Party have paid for Christian Dickson's billboard on the motorway near Sippy Downs?

2) Is it true State Liberal Member Steve Dickson and/or the Liberal Party has been throwing their weight around by having "candidate meetings" where only Christian & Tom are invited?

3) Is it true State Liberal Member Steve Dickson and/or the Liberal Party is coaching Div 7 candidate Ted Hungerford?

From what I hear the Liberal party are well & truly behind some candidates in this election & it is about time the truth was told.

Here is a question, if Steve Dickson stands outside a polling booth on Saturday is he there as dad or the State Member? And before you answer the question think about the people who have been told by there respective state govt head offices not to hand out cards for any candidate.

Yep, there is no party politics in this election!!!!

- I think you are spot on John. There is certainly a feeling while the big parties don't want to be seen to be involved in this campaign directly - they are there - and on all sides. Just as the big parties now target the Gold Coast council, it won't be long before they look at the Sunshine Coast to run full teams. And my guide to division six could have been a little more comprehensive. To be honest though, I wasn't overly impressed by Lucretia when she ran in the mayoral race several years ago. Super qualified but some of the things she said didn't go down well with a residents' meeting I attended in Buderim - can't remember the details, though - and who knows she may have improved. - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 9:20 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Mark, what happened 4 years ago is a bit irrelevant now. Hell, 4 years ago Christian was in school!!!!
Maybe people wanted to hear the fluffy stuff and didn't want to hear reality and may be it was not her best attempt however you cannot deny her qualifications to actually do the job. Public appeal comes with grooming but I think we have enough plastic politicians now, don't you?

- That's true... I'd much prefer a pollie to say it like it is rather than tell people what they want to hear - but there is an art in doing it so you don't come across as a condescending or superior. - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 9:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I was interested to see that your comments regarding my division were "Aboriginal elder Anthony Beezley would be my pick here. He’s a big bloke with a big heart, and it would be nice to think the first Sunshine Coast council had someone to represent our original inhabitants."

I agree that it would be good to have an Aboriginal representative on the new council however both of the meet the candidate functions that I attended Anthony seemed to make broad generalising comments with no real solutions.

With him saying things like “The youth of today are un-Australian” and “I have never heard of a young Christian hanging themselves or being drunk in the street”.

I am not sure that this man is the right man for the job. Some more information on your reasons for giving him your endorsement would be nice.

- I've known Beezley through church and school circles for quite some time - he's just a bloke that has his heart in the right place. Whether he's cut out for the rigours of political life, I can't judge but he's certainly running for the right reasons. - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
To paraphrase: Where there is a National running vote for them if they haven't already disgraced themselves too much.

Mr Furler has 'outed' the only two members of the Labor Party running but doesn't mention the party affiliations of anyone else. Let me put the record straight:

Division 1: The Editor's Choice Steve Attrill holds executive positions in The Nationals. (Better read again FedUp - that was not my choice - MF)
Division 2: Ron Strong has been an endorsed Nationals candidate for the State seat of Glasshouse.
Division 3: No National running.
Division 4: No National running, so the Editor's default choice is the ex-Liberal serial preselection candidate over the Liberal who is still in play.
Division 5: No National running.
Division 6: Tom Hulett was a member of the Nationals. He claims to have quit, but maybe he's only cut down a little because at every state and federal election he still campaigns actively for the Nationals. (He's not my choice there - I was being sarcastic - read again FedUP)
Division 7: Lachlan Miller is a former press adviser to Nationals Leader Lawrence Springborg. (Again - not my choice - read again)
Division 8: Mr Furler has washed his hands of Tom Hulett's protege there, but may yet reconsider if he comes to understand that Jeff Watson withdrew from joining the Labor Party rather than compete for Debbie Blumel's volunteer campaign workers. (Makes no difference to me - MF)
Division 9: No National running.
Division 10: The Nationals' Greg Rogerson is so irretrievably doomed by his record that he doesn't get a mention, even though he's a sitting councillor.
Division 11: No National running.
Division 12: No National running.

- I'm not sure what your point in all of this is FedUp but I will re-read your comments if you promise to re-read mine - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Mark you say,"it’s my view that Joe Natoli is being tarred a little too heavily with the developers’ brush by his critics.

No one does more to brush the tar than Joe himself. Not only was he willing to trash the town plan and vote for gross over development at Yaroomba but he continues to defend his right and that of councillors to receive gratuities while development applications are before them! In other words he and the others have no intention of acting any differently in the new council! This is leadership?

No Brer Rabbit briar patch escape for Joe this time. Bring on the feathers.

Hey folks.. listen...Is that Uncle Bob I hear singing down by the river? ..."plenty a' sunshine comin' ma' way
Zippity do dah ....
on 11 March, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Editor, having your heart in the right place is not enough. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

- Fair call - my blog is my personal opinion - not that of the paper's - nor one as Editor - and as I said at the end of it - make up your own mind folks - do the research - we've provided heaps of information - from our reporters, the candidates themselves - and bloggers' opinions. Make the most of it - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 3:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Mark,

I dont really understand your view on Mr Hungerford. As a Div 7 voter can you elaborate abit further??

- The guy doesn't come across to me as being super bright. - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 5:46 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
now now ed. shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, Ted can be quite bright in actuality :P.

Nice to see you've actually done up a list of your ideas. i only hope that people that disagree are going to realize that they're your personal opinions (my gosh FedUp is getting frustrating with his personal list though. i respect his opinion, but he's shoving it everywhere)

Nice to see you keeping up to date with replying to people's comments as well, my questions would be who IS your pick out of Div 6, seeing as it seems to be the most controversial, doesn't it?

And For Division 8 (i bring this one up, because as you may have noticed in other articles.. it's the division i've done the most research in) How it is that you've come to that decision? I'm not questioning or arguing against, but would I be able to get further input if possible?

- I think you guys are agonising a little too hard over this list - the point of the article was more to get everyone thinking about who they believe best represents them - not just take Mark Furler's advice and vote accordingly (as if you are going to anyway)... As for Ted H, in fairness to him I have only spoken to him directly on a few occasions... again do the research folks - talk among yourselves. Check out out guide - that was the point of the blog - MF
on 11 March, 2008 at 8:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
eek I hope you're not referring to me with agonising over etc. as i said nice to see you've done a list, and i fully support the reasoning behind it (in fact i was quite happy to see that it was done on this level)

I wasn't questioning your judgment or anything along that, i was just asking you, as an individual how it is you came to your decisions, not to question them, just out of curiosity to be honest. I'm always interested in how people come around to making decisions and such (if that makes any sense at all)

but yes, please dont think i was questioning your judgement or anything, just responding and asking another person how their decisions were made (trying to forget that the other person happens to be an editor.. haha)
on 12 March, 2008 at 11:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Nice to see we don't have to spend millions to enter politics in this country, leaves an outside chance of getting someone honest. I know Keryn Jones, the favourite, and Mark's pick for Div 3. very well.

She is truly a candidate worth having. Here we have an opportunity to elect someone scrupulously honest with the brains and ability to do the job properly.

Keryn is a real person with two really great teenage kids who has run a succesful business - to the point where the councillors wage won't be any great pay rise. She is in this race because she truly cares about the Coast, her home for over twenty years. She is concerned about politicians doing sweetheart deals with developers to the detriment of our lifestyle and our children.

She is someone who will not let our environment be sold to the highest bidder. She's paid her own way in her campaign and would not accept the bribery we call campaign contributions (I believe she accepted one small donation from a friend on the SCEC - she has the details on her website kerynjones.com).

Yes, she's a bit of a Greenie, but not in the long-haired, tie-yourself-to-a-tree mold. She knows how to manage development without destroying our homes and lifestyles and, quite simply, will do things for the right reasons.

We in Div.3 are lucky to have Keryn running, usually the best people refuse to dirty their hands in the cesspool that is modern politics, but Keryn is prepared to stand up and be counted. We need more like her.

If you aren't in Div 3, see if you have a candidate of similar ilk and vote for them, if you are, consider yourself lucky to have someone who actually cares about the Coast and it's people rather than their own gain. Let's hope we get Keryn Jones, Bob Abbot, and a few more like them.

We will get the government we deserve, let’s hope we deserve people like Keryn jones.
on 12 March, 2008 at 2:38 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm not sure that voters would be that much better informed after reading this.

I think your linking Joe Natoli with housing affordability does Bob Abbot a disservice. Noosa Council has had a committee looking into affordable housing for some time, whereas, as far as I know, Joe has only started talking about it now that there's an election coming.

I think you were also harsh on Ted Hungerford. I don't think there's too many candidates who are as honest and committed to the job.

- Fair enough - thanks for the input - MF
on 12 March, 2008 at 4:19 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
This article/commentary is pretty glib, considering the importance of this election and the fact that due to amalgamation, electing experienced, intelligent and proactive Councillors to position our particular Divisions is more important than ever.
As a resident of the former Noosa Division One and now Division 12, and seeing and being involved in various work that both Crs Lindfield and Brennan have done over the years, I think that to label Lew Brennan's main credentials as 'former brikkie' is misleading to new residents of Division 12. Brennan has instigated and led several high level projects, such as Education, Broadband and other economic initiatives, that display his business nous, intelligence and passion for boosting his Division.
Just read his profile on this website and it is clear that he is the type of strategic thinker that is needed for Division 12 in the coming few years, which no doubt will be turbulent.

Ed: The main aim of this column was actually to drive home the importance of the election and not to tell people how to vote, but rather to encourage them to carefully assess the different candidates (through the stories and profiles on this website and elsewhere) before making their decision.
on 12 March, 2008 at 5:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Carmen, Lew Brennan was rated poorly by the local community groups due to his track record in attempting to change the council plans. Changing council plans and the accompanying uncertainty is what many in the hinterland fear would be the result of amalgamation. It's important that we get a representative that represents our division and Lee Brennan doesn't appear to be the type to do that.
on 13 March, 2008 at 10:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Candidates Thomson, Hulett, Northey Rogerson, Maroochy Councillors, voted in favour of the Links proposal to double the size of Montville with a residential golf estate on 22 farms.

This action contravened Maroochy 2000 town plan, the South East Queensland Regional Plan and took no account of the wishes of the majority of residents.

Please, voters, don't give us someone who will not abide by the planning scheme.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments are moderated, should be on-topic and not abusive