Mark, editor-in-chief of the Sunshine Coast Daily, has been a journalist on the Coast for 20 years and is passionate about fighting for a better deal for the region. When he's not at work, he loves nothing more than spending time with his wife Julie and three kids. We owe pensioners a better deal
| Mark Furler
When pensioners are ready to take off their tops and flash their bras to the world, you know they’re not going to be placated by one-liners from politicians along the lines of ‘we know it’s tough out there’.
Pensioners rightly feel ripped off by last week’s federal budget.
At a time when housing, fuel and grocery prices are soaring and many are struggling to even pay the rent, the government for so-called family battlers did precious little to help them.
And treasurer Wayne Swan did little to appease them when he admitted he couldn’t live on the basic pension.
Warana’s Bev Winiata, best illustrated the plight facing many elderly on the Sunshine Coast in a letter to the Daily published yesterday.
After getting her pension out last Thursday, she was sorting through the bills she had to pay.
The elderly guy next to her knew exactly what she was going through.
“His eyes filled with tears as he told me that his fortnightly rent was now more than his pension and so he was on his way to buy a tent but had no idea where he was going to pitch it,” Bev wrote.
“He openly sobbed as he told me he was 79 years old and had worked until he was 70. It broke my heart to see this old man in tears.
“Thanks prime minister Rudd for nothing.”
The sentiment was just as strong on Friday when up to 300 elderly citizens crammed the steps in front of the Flinders St Railway Station in Melbourne to push their cause.
After one man shed his top, other women joined in, putting aside their normal modesty to get their message across.
“If we don’t stick up for ourselves no one else is going to do it for us,” one grandmother said.
Pensioners told of how they struggled to pay bills and put food on their tables while politicians retired on pensions fit for kings. They are demanding the government give them another $100-a-week extra payment.
And if the results of an opinion poll published yesterday are anything to go by, this issue is not going to go away for our old Nambour High boys.
The poll found nearly 70 per cent of households with children fear they will end up being worse off or are unsure about last Tuesday’s budget. The survey found that people aged over 50 feel ripped off with 41 per cent pessimistic about the budget.
A total of 41 per cent of people aged over 50 believe they will be worse off, including 18 per cent who think they will be “much worse off”.
But those looking to the Opposition for a sense of hope will be sorely disappointed.
Opposition leader Brendan Nelson admitted there was a strong argument to increase the pension which can be as little as $270 a week for singles. But Dr Nelson, whose own government was not advocating a rise when it was in power, refused to make a commitment.
On the government side, Mr Swan argues there’s an extra $900 for pensioners and seniors in the budget, but admits many of them are doing it tough.
They sure are, and when they see politicians retiring on absurdly generous pension packages – or being given $300,000 a year overseas postings, it’s little wonder they’re ready to rage.
While every government has a responsibility to run a tight ship financially, if we can’t look after our most vulnerable, then what sort of a lucky country are we?
We owe our pensioners, many of whom have worked hard to build the country we now enjoy, a much better deal than the budget delivered.
Out of touch?
I really think our magistrates and judges need to get out a lot more.
Not only do they seem so out of touch on sentencing decisions, but some of their comments are just plain ridiculous.
Maroochydore magistrate Bernadette Callaghan took the prize last week when she suggested that violent assaults aren’t that prevalent in Mooloolaba and that she did not see that many of those sorts of offenders come before her.
The comments came just a couple of days after the Daily ran a headline questioning whether Mooloolaba was becoming ‘bash central’ after a series of incidents.
While police chiefs and magistrates seem always keen to downplay crime – and statistically speaking they may be right – I’d prefer to take the experience of cabbies – and cops on the street – as a far better litmus test of what’s really going on.
Terry Lawlor has been driving the streets of the Sunshine Coast for the past 15 years and was outraged at Ms Callaghan’s comments.
“In the last few months many of our cabs have gone into alarm because of passenger behaviour, a driver bashed, windows broken by a brick, panels kicked, fares not paid, and I think the worst and most dangerous of all, objects thrown at moving vehicles.”
Mr Lawlor believes a “short stay in the lock-up, community service, curfew and most definitely a no-alcohol clause” might be the best way to turn around the disturbing behaviour.
Couldn’t agree more Terry.





Not Registered? Quick registration and comment.



Recent Comments
The Police via their vocal union and political support for the conservative side of politics also love a soft target and blame the magistrates and judges who can't reply to such attacks.
The courts are not perfect and silly decisions are often made, however this campaign against the observations of Magistrate Callaghan has all the hallmarks of picking a target that can't fight back whilst the people who are responsible for the situation you believe exists are treated with kid gloves. Leave the soft targets for the spineless bullies.
I am not aged, but I did for many years work and pay my taxes.In fact I continue to battle on even after my health started to fail.But eventually it all became too much and I had to accept the inevitable and retire from the workforce.
Don't get me wrong I am grateful to live in a country where I can get government assistance.But the amount we are paid should be reviewed.$270 a week is simply not enough.A couple gets more money then a single but some of the bills are the same regardless of a person being a single or part of a couple.
Things like phone,rego,house insurance,contents insurance,house and car maintenance,rates and often rent are the same for the single as they are for a couple.I know it costs more to feed and clothe two people,but the differences in the amount we are paid is unfair.
I now have to resort to shopping in a church run supermarket for as many groceries as I can.
I say come on to the powers that be why are pensioners the forgotten members of society.
I worked hard,I bought myself a home(enforced saving for which I am grateful now) and I did not willingly go from a well paying job to welfare.I challenge the pollies to try and live on what pensioners are paid and see how they like it
THOSE OF US ON PENSIONS NEED HELP AND WE NEED IT NOW!!!
I know that my own mother, who is a single Pensioner, would find it difficult to survive without my help. But the galling thing is that we have to give her the support in kind because if Centrelink got wind of the fact that she got any financial support from us they would cut her pension - or worse, stop it completely for 8 weeks before they cut it back.
bang4bucks.com.au
Using the Vets and Pensioners money for their hidden perks and life style. In any other type of employment you must have a license, Police check, proof of existence, experience or health check, except of course if you go into Politics which explains a lot about politicians, as you can be as mad as a hatter without having to have a mental or emotional stability examination to see if your fit enough to run a bloody car, let alone run a country, (Take Hitler, Mugabe, Idi Armin, Bush and his mates for i.e.) and should be mandatory.
Just take a few moments to reflect on every day life of yesteryear, and how it is today. Today we have Pollies with even greater adolescent egotistical minds; they have allowed foreign countries to take over our Industries, getting a pittance in return in royalties, they throw millions of dollars in aid to other countries and sporting venues, suck up to large corporatism and don’t turn a hair as the hospitals are unable to cope thro lack of bed space etc and killing someone is a six month sentence at a holiday resort.
We have to fight again, this time for our grandchildren. They must learn old-fashioned values like self-respect, pride, courtesy, honesty and commonsense. I think the answer lies in the next elections, don’t vote for either Major Party, vote only for the minor parties and Independents Its sad to realize that a great country like Australia has rapidly become a clone of the poor mans America, where drugs, booze and graffiti is the norm. So cut the crap and call a spade a spade like we did in the old days, and tell the officer exactly where to shove his brass rings; that Australia doesn’t exist anymore so lets not kid ourselves that it does, as its all sooo politically incorrect.
But the old fashioned phrase that I {we} was brought up with I believe still holds true, “ You enter my house then you obey my house rules or out you go no matter who you are, or who you think you are” “ Leaders of men {communities} lead by {exemplary} example”
There is a whole lot of frustration and rage amongst us old sweats that have to listen to the bulldust that spews from the wet behind the ears girl guides so called politicians.
Regards PETER WA.
soapy11
Reply: example is, we preference another minor if that party has already dropped out the preferences flow to the next on our ticket and so on down the list till they get to a party that is still in the race - as I said hopefully we stay in the race to the end and our preferences don't go anywhere. The voter of course can *"vote below the line"* in the upper house and decide where the preferences go themselves.
Have to warn you that where we do recommend preferences (which I think will be most seats) they will eventually go to a major because as I said you have to number all the boxes. *"Sometimes we don't recommend it,"* for ie, have an open ticket or have split ticket (which is basically how to preference either major), the problem with these is we get very negative feedback from voters because they get very confused - can't win either way it seems.
----- Original Message -----
From: (Senator)
To: Soapy 11
Sent: 17, 2008
Hi Soapy
Thanks for your email, yes I'm aware of the frustrations of many pensioners right now. On the preference question in the lower house we can't direct preferences, we can recommend but not direct, we also don't have an optional preference system in WA so voters have to decide where their preferences will go - which is at this stage still to either of the two major parties.
At this stage I can't tell you what our recommendations are in each seat as these are currently being decided. In the upper house to lodge a preference ticket we have to number all the boxes and the preferences might end up with one of the majors although we try to preference minors and independents first, we of course hope our votes stay with us and we get elected.
regards: (Senator)
-----Original Message-----
From: :soapy
To: (Senator)
Dear Senator, the question is simple enough. Does your party use preference votes to give to the major party's? The reason I ask is that many thousands of seniors and pensioners are sick to death of the constant two Party system, and preference votes ensures that either party is bound to take government. Their only difference being one prefers sniffing chairs while the other one keeps a bogey man in the closet. c Essentially in WA it would be a pristine time to let the public know your party's use of preferences are, especially after the NT results. Or, if you have no intention of using them. Imagine if you will, the icy chill of fear running down the chosen ones spines in Canberra, as well as WA and the other states, that not only pensioners and the like, but the general public has had enough of the performing penguins of both sides of politics.