Sean Waddington has contributed to the Daily for more than 15 years. He remains amazed and ever grateful that in this complicated world of war, climate change and the AFL draft, editors allow him to indulge in such simple pleasures as eating Sunnyboys, running through sprinklers and skimming stones. Recent entries
- The best days of my life
- School's in and reality bites
- Yelp, a canine emergency
- Second-child syndrome
Archive
It's high time we changed our national anthem
| Sean Waddington
It is true that Australia has far more pressing issues on its plate than fixing the national anthem just now, but it would put a song in my heart to know we were not stuck with it forever.
The words are meaningless, uninspiring and outdated, make no mention of indigenous Australians and are wrung out of me parrot-fashion through sense of duty rather than true pride.
I will stand tall when the children sing it this Anzac Day to honour the diggers, but the emotions that will inevitably stir will do so on the reminder of the incredible sacrifices made so our young can live as they do, not through any special poetry.
Their deeds transcend words.
Advance Australia Fair was probably not a bad little ditty in its day, back when Scottish-born Peter Dodds McCormick first penned it.
It struck a certain chord in the colony, gaining its first public airing in 1878 and used at the inauguration of the Commonwealth of Australia on 1 January 1901.
He was apparently awarded 100 pounds by the Australian government for his composition, and it seems we have been paying ever since.
It’s not Mr McCormick’s fault. He couldn’t have possibly foreseen the far-reaching implications of his work when he put quill to paper and, among other things, resurrected the word “girt” which must have been thousands of years out of fashion even then.
I imagine that with the arrival of the song, girt may have become one of the first recorded buzz words of the bureaucratic elite – one which left the battler scratching his head in the same way he does now.
Picture this scene.
It’s 200 years ago and the police have surrounded Glenrowan Hotel where the Kelly gang is holed up inside.
The commanding officer bellows across the cold Victorian air: “Surrender scoundrels, for you are totally girt”.
Completely unimpressed by being called totally girt, Ned dons a suit of armor and engages in his infamous last stand, determined to take as much of the establishment down with him as possible in the bloody shootout.
Or maybe don’t, it’s up to you.
The point is, it’s a ridiculous word in a ridiculous song that should never have gained the currency that it did.
It’s a bit like when the Swingers recorded Counting the Beat in 1980. It was harmless enough in its day but I think even the band would have to agree now that enough is enough.
Our daughter Clementine is a proud, six-year-old Australian. She was singing the national anthem as I walked her to school the other day.
This is her version of the opening line, sung honestly and without hesitation.
“Australians all have ostriches.”
Now, I’m not saying we should change it to that but it does have a certain ring to it. And what kid couldn’t relate to a land so free that we could all own gigantic flightless birds?
She injected the sense into that she needed, which is more than can be said for me when I was in her shoes, back when our national anthem was God Save The Queen and even harder to relate to than this one, if that’s possible.
I always had a mental image of our queen falling from the heavens with an umbrella – Mary Poppins style – when I sang the lines: “Send her victorious, happy and glorious, along with the rain over us”.
Words are hard to remember when they mean nothing. The band Weddings Parties Anything said that. I can’t forget it.
Journalist Kerry O’Brien raised the question about the national anthem to Kevin Rudd on the 7.30 Report this week. He asked the Prime Minister if it stirred him.
The PM replied: “It does and the reason it does is when you’ve got verses like, for those who come across the seas we’ve boundless plains to share. That should be the resolve of any Australian Government, unlike the one that we replaced which seemed to pull up the shutters when it came to our proper international obligations particularly to refugees who found themselves in real strife.”
This was a fabulous answer, it has to be said.
I did notice, however, Kevin didn’t make reference to line four of the song which makes the important observation of how the sea arranges itself around our home.
On that point I guess he sensed that his interviewer had him … what’s the word? ... encircled.





Not Registered? Quick registration and comment.




Recent Comments
Put it on the list with becoming a Republic...
I would say only 50% of the population even know all the words to the song.
Have you ever looked at footy players struggling with the words. That is because it is a sissies song.
We need something with a bit of substance.
~Why don't we have a national competition to find a wonderful new song that we can all identify with.~
Let's embrace all aspects of our culture and have a song that is patriotic. A song, when you are away from these shores, brings pride and emotion to each of us.
We don't need a Republic - just a new anthem will do!!
Now short of starting some war and hoping like hell a cool ditty comes out it, maybe we should be asking why we need to change at all? The US celebrates to anthem because it reflects where they came from and captured the spirit at the time yet this was not recognised until some 117 years later. What is even more important is that spirit for which the song was adopted still lives today and if it was ever suggested it be changed because someone thinks it is not 21st century enough, then they best leave the country now before they are lynched. As pointed out by "oldsalt" the UK has another song just as stirring which supports the national anthem. The US also sings America the Beautiful which to some is as good if not of equal standing as the national anthem.
Now it can be argued that when our anthem was written it too reflected the spirit at the time and therefore unless that spirit has disappeared then the meaning should still hold. We enter a new time when the word Republic is being thrown around like many other buzz words so may I suggest we think long and hard before trying to change who and what we are. Changing things for today can often lead to a loss of the past.
You are quite right in saying that changes today can lead to loss of the past.
I feel the same way about changing our beautiful flag.
Advance Australia Fair, although written in the 1800's was only adopted by the Whitlam government in 1975.
Some people would prefer to hear "Waltzing Matilda" played but without the accompanying words.
I tend to agree with this.
People don't really need to sing their national anthem, they can just listen to a tune for the same results.
As far as a Republic is concerned, lets not waste any more money on this unworthy debate. Australia has some very serious social issues at the moment and the cost to us as a nation would not warant the expense.[Even new passports etc.]
A decade or two down the track the next generation will probably be ready for a Republic and it will happen without much fuss or anguish.
Some of us will probably be senile by then, so it won't worry us at all....will it!!
^ GOLD!
"People don't really need to sing their national anthem, they can just listen to a tune for the same results."
^ I completely disagree, and I think anyone in the world who's ever felt stirred or touched or somehow affected by any lyric (so basically... everyone in the world) would also disagree with you. Words are important; they're the best and most effective tool we have as humans. Music is important too, but it's really words that make an impact. And Waltzing Matilda is a pretty dodgy tune, even if you take out the sheep-thief suicide. Apart from having a lame and uncomplex melody, it was the first recorded instance of product placement in Australia (that reference to Billy tea wasn't always there).
As for the word 'girt' - you know, I actually think that's one of the best parts of our anthem. The fact that it's so absurd and outdated and awkward, I think, makes a lot of Aussies feel even more affectionate towards and protective of it. It brings us together in a shared sense of the ridiculous.
I feel an appropriate trend would be for all Australians to use the word 'girt' in everyday life as much as possible. Even - nay, especially - when it makes no contextual sense whatsoever.
For example:
"Did you see the game on the weekend?"
"Nah, I was out girting it up with the missus. How was it?"
"Bit of an anticlimax. The stupid girts were all over the shop."
"Ah, well. You heading home early today?"
"Nah, putting in some overtime. I'm completely girt by paperwork."