Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
6:52PM Tuesday 02 December, 2008

How accurate are new roadside drug tests?

How accurate are new roadside drug tests?

Concerns have been raised over new roadside drug tests in Queensland.

Lawyers are lining up to question the accuracy and purpose of new roadside drug tests, claiming there is insufficient scientific evidence to justify the government’s random approach.

Launching the new roadside tests last week, Police Minister Judy Spence said there would be zero tolerance for those who climbed behind the wheel under the influence of marijuana, speed, ice or ecstasy.

Ms Spence said those were caught would face fines of up to $1050 and lose their licence for up to nine months for a first offence.

But some in the legal community, who prefer not to be named, suggested the new laws appeared to be more about detecting drug use in the community than getting unsafe drivers off the road.

President of the Council for Civil Liberties Michael Cope said for the first time in Queensland, it would become an offence to have certain illicit drugs in your system, regardless of whether those substances were causing any driving impairment.

"As far as we are concerned there is no established mechanism for relating the amount of drug in your system to impairment, which will vary significantly from one individual to another," Mr Cope said.

"There are also other issues abut the testing equipment potentially producing false positives, including for the use of common prescription drugs."

Mr Cope said research conducted in Canada found drug testing had returned false positives for 100 legally prescribed drugs.

Mr Cope said there was also concern that some drugs, such as cannabis, could linger in a person’s system.

Sunshine Coast defence solicitor Chelsea Emery said she believed there were still a number of unanswered questions about the new laws and there was little reference to what levels of a drug would determine any impairment.

"It’s known that cannabis metabolites stay in your system for about four weeks, even though the substance which gives the drug high is long gone.

"Does this mean you could smoke cannabis at a party – or even ingest second-hand smoke – and be random drug-tested weeks later, and then charged with an offence?"

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 5 December, 2007 at 11:30 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The bleeding hearts have started already! Let the courts determine the first cases to see if the testing is good enough. If it is not, the cases will be thrown out. Simple. Then it will be up to the police to come up with more reliable testing standards, or drop the testing until better tests are available.
on 5 December, 2007 at 12:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
My understanding and certainly the written material on the Qld Transposrts website is that the tests are testing for THC - the active ingredient in Marijuana. Once the THC metabolises it can still be detected in the persons system but more invasive tests are required such as a urine or blood test. The active THC is able to be detected in saliva for about 4 to 14 hours after consumption depending on the strength of the drug taken. An article on a WA website when this same testing was introduced over there indicates that if you had taken marijuana on the weekend or weeks ago this would not show up in the test as it has metabolised. I could be wrong.
on 5 December, 2007 at 7:57 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Whatever the possible negatives from this testing, the positives far outweigh it. It might even make people think a bit more about how stupid it is to take drugs before they get into it - if only because they are now more likely to get caught for it (contrary to what some may say this is actually a good thing). And if people are worried about getting picked up for the passive smoking of dope, then they should rethink who they hang out with. Choose your actions /acquaintances and youve choose your consequences. Victims who have been killed by drivers under the influence of drugs have not had such a luxury.
on 6 December, 2007 at 5:41 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Rethink who you hang out with? Oh for heavens sake, lighten up! I have been at many a get together where the odd joint has been smoked and I have been sitting nearby, exposed to the smoke. No I wouldnt expect to be penalised for that! I cant control the actions of others unfortunately. I am for drug testing on the roads, however if it picks up people in that sort of instance it needs to be reviewed.
on 7 December, 2007 at 11:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If you want to minimize drug drivers then please legalise and standardise drugs in the same way that alcohol is legalised and standardised (1 pot of full stregth beer= 1 schooner of light and both = 1 standard drink).

Then informed adults would be able to stay under 'the limit'. If you say that any amount of THC inhibbits your driving you are missinformed (or lying).

More research into the level of 'intoxication' and it's effect on reaction ect.

For the record I believe I will always function at a higher level then the robot police who enforce these laws (stoned or not).

enjoy the beautiful coast weather
(sorry for spelling mistakes)

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.