Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
4:51PM Tuesday 02 December, 2008

Are super-councillors worth $130,000?

The new Sunshine Coast Regional Council will run like a “board of directors”, with highly paid councillors expected to take on a strategic role and not cater to the everyday needs of ratepayers.

The suggestion came from the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal in its report this week.

The tribunal argued that councillors should move away from a “community service” role and adopt a “board of directors approach”, leaving the dealing of problems like “barking dogs and potholes” to council officers.

Coast councillors will not need formal qualifications for the new executive role, which will land them on a starting salary of up to $132,260 a year, and our mayor up to $220,000. The tribunal also said it would consider financial rewards for councillors who attained extra qualifications.

“The tribunal may, in the future, consider determining a certain remuneration structure for councillors who attain a local government or company director qualification,” the report said.

The tribunal believed the role of councillor “seems to be evolving from what was once seen as a ‘community service’ type role to a more strategic one”.

“The tribunal is of the opinion that councillors will be required to move local government and community expectations away from the traditional role of councillors dealing with minor community issues such as potholes and barking dogs to a more strategic level, where councillors operate like a board of directors,” the report said.

Salary packages for directors on the Coast varied from about $60,000 to nearly $600,000, depending on whether they had an executive or non-executive role.

Buderim Ginger Chairman John Ruscoe earned $65,400 last year, and the managing director, Gerard O’Brien, took home $307,714. Oaks Group chief executive Brett Pointon had a package of about $582,000, FKP managing director PR Brown earned $532,400, and the chairman, BW MacDonald, took home $176,000.

Industry expert Duncan Schultz, of Pacific Governance, did not believe the salaries for the mayor or councillors were too high. “Non-executive directors in public companies earn between $50,000 and $100,000, while executives earn hundreds of thousands – councillors would fall between the two,” he said.

But the high salary package was a “surprise” to Caboolture mayor Joy Leishman who – if she becomes mayor for the Moreton Bay Regional Council – will earn as much as the Coast mayor.

“I was somewhat surprised at the pay level,” she said. “When I stood down as councillor in 1991 I strongly held the view (that) if the pay range was a living wage, we would do better in the representation stakes.

“Now we are very well paid, but I didn’t think we’ve seen much change and my belief of the mid-80s was incorrect.

“People come in for different reasons, making high pay is not one of those.”

Ms Leishman also believed there should be debate on what type of role the community expected councillors to perform.

“There should be a debate on whether we should have a corporate model based on a board of people being here five days a week, like I am,” she said.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 6 December, 2007 at 4:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The remuneration is a bit of a sideshow really. The real issue is in what sort of representation we are likely to get from a structure where our elected representatives are told that they don't need to worry about representing their local communities. This is being left to the council employees...who are not elected by the people. They are appointed by a beaurocratic management which will be governed by its guidelines and procedures, not by any real intent to help the local community.

Is this the QLD Government's grand vision for the future of "local" government in QLD ?
on 6 December, 2007 at 4:53 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Not one of the current group of Sunshine Coast councillors should be allowed to stand for the super council on the grounds of bias alone ... Especially the three mayors of today who for one reason or another are not fit or talented enough to do the job ...

Personally I think a twenty foot fence shoud be built around Noosa to keep them all away from the normal people in the south. The tunnel vision of most of the current councilors is mind blowing and the arrogance is disgusting ... Lets start afresh with some talented and capable councillors who will have the general interest of all Sunshine Coast people

Errol Tomkins, Caloundra
on 6 December, 2007 at 6:45 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Having less representatives is major win for the major parties, as concentrating the vote to fewer reps will favour the big parties and squeeze out any desent. The pay rises are shutup money in exchange for less democracy.

erroltomkins from Caloundra, I support your separation idea for the Noosa area. We can well do without your southern debt levels, higher rates, pro developer councilors, lower property prices, bullying and resultant neglect the Noosa area will receive when the deaf Super Council gravy train rolls into town.

Pay more peanuts, get bigger monkeys.
on 6 December, 2007 at 4:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I feel this is a retrograde step. Local Government is supposed to be the closest to the people. Councillors are voted in on the pretext that they will be readily available to see to ratepayer concerns. I know the Local Government Act states that Councillors should no longer be " Pot hole " Councillors but policy makers. In my mind they can be both and never loose touch with the community. A classic example is MP Peter Wellington who does his utmost to be readily available to the Community needs be it small or large.

Trevor Thompson
Yandina
on 7 December, 2007 at 12:42 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The local Govt Act really says there are two roles for local Councillors - the corporate responsibility, whole of Shire role and also the role to act as a representative for the Division (and people) in which elected. The Tribunal suggests there is a need to drift away from the local scene - it does not say there has to be an end to local representation - it did not change the Act.

For my part, the helping of local people who feel the need to be heard or that they have no capacity or opportunity to challenge Council policy or practice need their local Councillor. I would never drop that part of the role - it is the one that matters! However, there is a need to look more closely at the genuine capacity of candidates to do the corporate part of the role.

In the real world, academic preparation and proven career success are never ignored. In todays corporate world especially in a company with revenue over $600 million and assets in the billions, being a 'nice bloke' or jumping on bandwagons of opposition to win votes is not enough. Nor should it be in the new, more complex Council.

I have seen those whose main ability is to get elected say in Council meetings, "I know it is right but I can't let my community see me support this" (or words to the effect). They may win voter support but not the integrity stakes.

The new, more complex, $600 million business known as Sunshine Coast Regional Council will need only the competent, qualified and experienced. Voters might ask which candidates could ever be expected to reach that level of remuneration or responsibility if selected on professional capacity to do the job. There is a difference between 'winning an election' and 'doing the job'.

It is no longer 'amateur hour' or 'nice bloke' selection but which of the professional or experienced people can also deliver the goods at a local community level.

We must not let Maroochy return to the financial 'cot case' days - we must select the competent.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.