12:00a.m. 24th April 2008
Mayor Bob Abbot has outlined his plan to control rampant population growth on the Sunshine Coast, by reducing the rate to the national average by 2023.
Mr Abbot yesterday responded to the latest figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showing our population growth is now at 3.5% a year, the third highest in the state behind the Gold Coast and Brisbane.
He said it was an unacceptable rate and would cost the community “millions” in the long run.
“My understanding is the national average is around about 2%, that means we’re running at about one and a half times the national average,” he said.
“That’s going to cost this communities millions in the future and really take away from all the things we enjoy here.
“If we could bring it back to something like just above or at the national average over the next 15 years, then I think this community has a real chance.”
He said in 2008, we had reached a point where the Sunshine Coast was generating its own economy and could afford to slow the level of growth.
“The damage hasn’t been done, I think we can certainly pull it back.
“The Sunshine Coast now is at a size where it can start to generate its own economy, it can start to generate all of those things that are important to us.
“We have the capacity now to start building a good transport system, we’ve got all those things in place.
“More and more growth is just going to make those things more and more difficult to do.”
Latest figures show the Sunshine Coast’s population grew from Sunshine Coast 247,200 in 2001 to 303,050 last year.
In the year to June 2007, Caloundra’s population grew by 2892, to 96,140. Maroochydore’s grew 4574 to 157,238 and Noosa’s population grew 0.9%, or by 459 people, to 49,672.
A workshop has been planned next month to develop what Mr Abbot calls practical solutions to the population issue.
High on the agenda is reviewing the current Local Growth Management Strategies.
When asked if a population cap would be appropriate, he replied: “The reality is that every planning scheme has a cap and that’s what I’ve been trying to say now for 10 years.
“What causes the growth rate to blow up like it does, is that the local councils tend not to stick to their planning schemes well enough.
“We have problems with the local growth management schemes on the Sunshine Coast which we have to try and resolve.
“We have to try and pull back the level of expansion in the next 10 years.”
The Sunshine Coast’s peak development organisation, the UDIA, has reacted with diplomacy.
Association president David Oliver said reducing the population wouldn’t necessarily have a negative effect on the development industry.
“If that’s his goal, then that’s fine, because it’s still a fairly significant growth rate,” Mr Oliver said.
“Growth is still growth.
“All we want the new council to do is manage the growth and efficiently.”
Speaking on behalf of major developers Stockland and Juniper, he expressed cynicism for Mr Abbot’s plan.
“How you are going to stop people coming here, I’m not sure,” he said.
“Good luck to him on his long term plan, but right now we just want council to manage the growth we’re experiencing.”
Tony Quinn, a foreman with Pumicestone Passage Developments, said he had worked in the local building industry for 40 years and would hate to think of the repercussions on an industry level should the population growth rate slow down.
“There have been a lot of changes, and right now business is booming,” he said.
“Our company has grown substantially in the last couple of years and if development does slow down, we will need to reduce staff numbers accordingly.”
Recent Comments
Get smart and release the majority of industrial and residential land for development on the west of the Bruce Highway, centered on the rail corridor. With excellent bus routes to the main coastal centres.
We currently cannot provide affordable housing for the children of the current residents and it seems only those moving from interstate who have benefited from capital growth in their housing can afford to live here. Going by the growth figures in 2007 and recent reports from the REIQ on house prices it is clear Noosa is unaffordable to the average person and therefore one could argue its population cap is working.
So is it therefore the plan of this council to restrict growth in such a way that house prices rise similar to Sydney and force our children away from the area?
What seems to turn the economy is tourists from Oz, and abroad....so, I don't think Bob is being realistic here.
Sunshine coast NEEDS the right type of people to come here. We need multi-ethnic backgrounds, and with this comes a variety of cuisine and learning how to do things different...often improving on how they were done before.
Shut off all the tourists, and prevent good people coming here and you're shooting yourself in the foot. And people were worried about Joe Natoli???
Well, duh. That has already happened.
All this crap about "you can't stop people coming here" is just that. But you don't have to go out and specially build houses for them or release greenfield sites. As Bob Abbot pointed out this morning on ABC radio, the turnover in population on the Coast is about 25-30%, so there are always plenty of properties for sale for anyone who wants to move here. QED.
It is also very disappointing to see the lovely green hills around Palmwoods and Woombye disappearing under housing estates. Please Bob put the population cap on soon before the lovely coast that we know and love disappears altogether!!!
The city of Blue Mountains, based on Katoomba in NSW tried it .. then suddenly they woke up to the fact that Sydney siders wanted to live in the mountains.. and so, they moved there. and guess what happened when housing supply ran out? Why they built new ones!! right where the council had said there'd be no new houses! it only takes a new council to change directions!
I really wonder about the success of the "housing cap" in the former Noosa shire .. delve and you will probably find, that people are still having babies there! you cant stop it. People procreate. its their right. its the way the population survives!
We have to get over this notion that the Sunshine Coast is unique. its not. its another spot on the map. just as the Gold Coast is, Coffs Harbour, - all attractive parts of the coastline that people consider to be lifestyle options.
Time to be realistic. unless we impose the chinese 'one family one child' approach, or bring in legislation that forbids people from relocating, there can not be a Population cap on the sunshine coast, so lets end all this silly talk, and get on with accepting the fact that our national population is growing, that our governments refuse to implement effective decentralisation policies to encourage people to move inland... That we are doing nothing to encourage a 'non coastal' lifestyle and that the entire country is being poorly managed by past and present government.
Provide the services to rural australia, and that means ALL services, and you will find that people will consider the inland lifestyle as an option. Not everyone feels the need to be close to the sea.
Sorry in this country a population cap is simply not going to work, and I wonder, if under our constitution it is even legal.
Opening up remote greenfield sites in the hinterland and having to extend overstretched services to them diverts resources from the existing logistical problems.
That's my backyard.
Here's an idea for your backyard:
Perhaps Mountain Creek and other areas close to the university could be developed into highrise to provide lower cost accommodation for young singles.
The Sunshine Coast will grow, and we should NOT try to stop it. When it grows, everyone will benefit. Yes, the infrastructures are in a mess right now, and it's the council's responsibility to fix that. But NOT by stopping people from moving here! Like, DUH?!
With the Mayor lending support to his councillors, its about time we all considered this. I want my children and grandchildren to be able to roam along the coast and experience what I experienced.
Yes - except for the 70% of residents who voted for a mayor who has said what he has said - that growth must lessen.
And except for the residents who came here for a certain lifestyle and are now being told that lifestyle has to be destroyed.
And except for the wildlife which another mass of people moved here to enjoy, whose habitat will disappear under concrete.
That probably leaves about half a dozen people - the pro-development contributors here on this blog.
It's us who "can never understand" you.
I'm all for Bob I rather breath fresh air than fumes and dust. Why can't people be happy where they live than moving to the coast. Save the planet stop developing our hinterland.
And I mean, if there's no more land to build, then surely development will kinda stop. But we don't try to stop development for the sake of protecting the current conditions. That sounds like some people who are scared of changes and do everything they can to 'stay the same'. Change is inevitable! Change is good!
Now, about lifestyle. If anyone says we have to protect the Sunshine Coast lifestyle. Well, you do whatever you can to protect your interests, but you can't stop people from moving into this area. This is a free country, no?
Once we have the facilities up and running I believe we will cope a lot better. Developments like the extension of Kawana Shoppingworld, Sunshine Plaza, Nambour's sugar mill site and the Kawana town centre to name a few will make all the current pain we are experiencing at the moment seem worth it when we experience the modern convenience these facilities will offer us.
I contacted the Lord Mayor Michael Harbison and he forwarded a pile of info. to me. We are now in a position to drive this kind of iniative in our area into a reality. Go to www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/tindo
Let's look to phasing out those great hulking diesel guzzlers and secure a sustainable future.
perhaps you can't understand 'pro development' people because you only see two sides.
does this mean i can call you 'anti-development' and claim you want ALL development to stop. completely?
I think all he was saying is that regardless of what we do, it shall grow, which is true. and therefore trying to stop it completely will just make things worse for when it DOES grow, and we're not prepared for it.
If that happens, i'm sure a large percentage of those '70% that agreed growth should lessen' will suddenly be annoyed that council didn't prepare for growth...
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again