Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
1:53PM Wednesday 03 December, 2008

Young aspiring soldier bashed family

Young aspiring soldier bashed family

Joshua Rhys Morley leaves Maroochydore District Court.

After he urinated on a Caloundra house and then bashed the male members of the family who came out to investigate, what do you think an 18-year-old man with dreams of joining the armed forces did next?

The budding young Rambo repeatedly threatened to kill his victims – including making a throat-slitting gesture – assaulted them in company, and abused and threatened police from the back of a patrol car.

One of the house’s occupants was knocked to the ground by the offender and attacked by a group of men.

But thanks to the leniency of the courts, Joshua Rhys Morley, of Mountain Creek, will be eligible to apply for military service.

Judge Keith Dodds fined him $1600 in Maroochydore District Court yesterday but did not record a conviction.

Having a criminal record would have barred Mr Morley, who pleaded guilty to four counts of assault causing bodily harm in company, from his chosen career path.

The statement of facts before the court detailed how Mr Morley went on a rampage against 48-year-old Robert Slatter and his sons Brett, 20, and Luke, 18, on November 11 about 10pm.

Brett had gone outside to investigate noises when he found Mr Morley and another man relieving themselves on the family’s house.

After he asked them to leave, they swore at him and he was struck in the back of the head.

“He turned around and the offender pushed his head from behind into the side of the house,” the statement said.

With a bleeding head, the young victim grabbed his attacker’s arm and saw him off the property. His father and brother came out and a group of males then came towards them.

All three were threatened by the offender and the father was punched in the mouth.

When police were called, Mr Morley told the father several times he was dead before shoulder charging him and knocking him to the ground. Mr Slatter was then attacked by the group of men and punched in the head.

His son Luke was also punched in the eye by one of the men.

“Brett tackled the offender, causing him to land on Luke and the offender then bit him on the right side of the chest,” the statement said.

The father was forced to punch Mr Morley twice in the head before he let go of Luke’s skin.

After his sentencing, Mr Morley told the media he was sorry and wished the events had never happened.

Mr Morley’s legal counsel, Damon Locantro, said the fine and no conviction was “a very fair outcome”.

“There were also a number of mitigating features that are taken into account when a court decides whether there should be a conviction,” Mr Locantro said.

“It was a spontaneous, isolated incident with no real serious injuries and the young gentleman has taken positive steps in his life, such that it’s never going to happen again.”

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
that is absolutely disgusting - it almost renders me speechless. And to get off with no conviction? Well thats really sending the message home isnt it! And to think this thug will be an Australian soldier - warms your heart doesnt it. What a bunch of animals - it really makes me sick to think that these people can get away with violating someone's home, assaulting them and then getting off scot free in court. They may as well make it legal. What a disgrace. No wonder people take the law into their own hands.
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:20 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well Mr Locantro, I am a bit stressed so can I make an appointment with you to come and be spontaneous?
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:48 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I wonder if the magistrates and the lawyers families were to experience this type of assault they would be as casual in their response! I doubt it!
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Another slap on the wrist, well done judicial system!!
Judge Dodd, what would happen if he had urinated in your yard and bashed your family?????
on 21 August, 2008 at 9 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"the young gentleman" - Please, Mr Locantro, you and I both know that term certainly doesn't apply to him.

Hopefully the army will sort him out.
on 21 August, 2008 at 9:42 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Can someone please explain to me why the judge allows this young bloke to get off with no conviction - supposedly in order to join the army (if he is 18 why hasn't he already signed up?). Yesterday we read of another young man who had his career dreams squashed by a magistrate in similar circumstances.

It looks like magistrates will forego convictions if you profess a desire to join the military; however if you want to play in the NRL then that is too bad - "you must live with the consequences of your actions"

Talk about major inconsistency!
on 21 August, 2008 at 10:18 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I hope Josh does well and truly take good advantage of the extra-ordinary leniency shown to him. He comes from a decent hard-working family and he should be ashamed at the shame he has brought on their name. But even more so, ashamed at the level of violence shown by him to innocent people merely objecting to their home being used as a public toilet.

Wake up to yourself Josh and get some professional help for whatever anger and violence 'issues' you seem to have. Next time will be jail time and you won't be so tough there, I can assure you.
on 21 August, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Most crime, whether it be assaults, murders and the like could be described as spontaneous. It seems that too much weight is being placed, these days, on the criminal and not the victim.

Section 12 of the Penalties and Sentences Act provides the guidelines for a conviction not being recorded...and in that vein 'the nature of the offence' seems to be regarded in a very poor third position, if at all, when making this coinsideration.

So he had 'dreams' of joining the Army, so what? Do they want him? Sign him up now and see how he goes in Iraq...let's see him urinate on a house over there!

on 21 August, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
“It was a spontaneous, isolated incident with no real serious injuries and the young gentleman has taken positive steps in his life, such that it’s never going to happen again.”

I dont think so!! we dont need people like this in our armed forces.
on 21 August, 2008 at 11:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Anyone else notice this is the same judge that gave the paedophile the lenient sentence the other day?
on 21 August, 2008 at 12:02 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
So, you all want young offenders to be made to join the army to "sort them out" and when it happens you all complain...

Make up your minds!
on 21 August, 2008 at 1:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
i dont want any offenders joining the army - I think entry into the army should be a privilege and an honour, not a punishment for idiots. The men and women in the army are serving their country and I dont want a thug defending me! It is an insult to the decent people in the army for anyone to suggest it become a dumping ground for violent offenders.
on 21 August, 2008 at 1:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
oh yeah... give the kid who threatens people leniency...

this must be a joke.
on 21 August, 2008 at 1:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
No, we definitely don't want to recruit people like this. In the Army they fight with honour. There is nothing honourable about his actions. Maybe this should be sent to the Defence Recruiting Centres. Not that they are allowed to discriminate but there is an awful lot of testing he'll need to go through to be a successful applicant and something tells me that he won't be.
on 21 August, 2008 at 2:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
"salanquia" has a valid point. Everyone has these "fix our youth" suggestions yet rarely do they provide a way of doing it. In no way do I say any military service is a dumping ground for trouble youth however there is real merit in a service where discipline is instilled, honour & respect made compulsory and maybe even show someone they do not have to "piss it up the wall" so to speak. Maybe a particular Army company can be established for exactly this purpose??
My gripe is the off handed smug remarks made by some lawyers when "getting their client off" that annoys me.
on 21 August, 2008 at 2:57 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I think it's a good thing if people like this join the army...as long as it's for the right reasons. To get their life back on track, do something worthy for their community and country and to prove that they were worthy of being given a generous second chance.
If he's joining for the wrong reasons or he's not suitable then I assume he'll be weeded out soon enough.
on 21 August, 2008 at 6:19 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Today we have a defendant wanting to join the army? Mmm, the other day a Barrister had someone wanting to play NRL.
Great, does this guys family live in a tent also.?
Sick to death of lenient sentences for offenders who intimidated decent families in our community.
The time has come for TWO years National Service for ALL school leavers.
After their completion of this service they can decide what career they would like to pursue.
Hopefully not too many will be heading for Centrelink.
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Give the Army selection process a bit more credit. This type of individual would not be acceptable
on 21 August, 2008 at 8:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
GET A LIFE!
Josh is an amazing guy, did one thing wrong last year, you can not all sit there and type rot about him , when im sure all of you have done a crime, taken drugs?? Drank dove??? Got into a fight??
Excactly so shut your mouths and get a grip,, find better things to do then to write about an, 18 year olds mistake last year.
on 21 August, 2008 at 10:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Coastlovers...gotta love your spelling, punctuation and gramma.

Shut our mouths? Wow. Get down off your little soapbox and accept your mate for what he is...stupid and aggressive. Haven't you heard that 'one punch can kill'?

'An amazing guy'...yeh, everyone must be so proud of him.
on 22 August, 2008 at 6:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Clearly he is a friend of yours and it's great that you want to defend him. But he didn't do just 'one' thing wrong. He displayed several acts of violence and abuse against several different people...including the police. I, for one, understand that everyone makes mistakes but, and let's be honest, that was a doozy. Perhaps if it was your father and brothers that he attacked then you'd see things differently. This is why we have courts of law so decisions can be made objectively.
I'm glad he's been given a second chance. I hope he appreciates it though and does something about his anger issues that the alcohol brought to the surface.
on 22 August, 2008 at 7 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
sorry to disappoint you coastlover but no i have never urinated on someone's house and then bashed the family. Im sick to death of excuses for violent thugs and that it was a one off mistake. Not everyone behaves like this and those who do need the strong arm of the law. Im sure as hell not going to put up with my family being threatened or my property vandalised by these jerks who later claim it was a "mistake". Honestly what are we coming to when we have people defending this behaviour.
on 22 August, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hey listen guys and gals just to make things perfectly clear here ... Coastlovers (plural) from Buderim is not Coastlover (singular) from Woombye ie me.

Chillibin called him/her coastlover when he/she is coastlovers.

I guess the poor grammar, spelling and punctuation is a giveaway but I just want to clear that up thanks :)

I may have to change my name.
on 22 August, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
CoastLover from Woombye, don't worry, we knew straight away it wasn't you. You are a much better speller and also you are not THAT agressive.

Let's face it how many of us "bloggers" have done drugs, drink drive and been in a fight.
Hello........not this one!!
I'm Mrs Goodytwoshoes!.
Cheers!!
on 22 August, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Send this feral little coward off to Iraq and let's see how brave he is against people equipped to fight back!
on 22 August, 2008 at 4:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Jas...your comment was printed in the daily today but said it was written by me. I'm glad I agreed with you.
on 22 August, 2008 at 8:34 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I would like to make one thing very clear....the previous blog which was posted was done so by my 16 year old daughter....and all I can say is that I do not know this kid and by all accounts from my daughter he is a decent kid who make a very bad choice, however if this happened to me, one of my family members or to my daughter I would expect some type of severe discipline handed out to Josh. I expect that his family are embarrassed and a little ashamed of their loved sons behaviour....wonder how he feels...I only hope he is not proud!!
on 23 August, 2008 at 1:31 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
so he wants to join the army. if josh's actions that lead to his court appearance are how he reacts to authority, how then would he behave in a position of authority?
on 24 August, 2008 at 4:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I have contacts at Defence Force Recruiting. They are now aware of this article.
on 18 October, 2008 at 7:10 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Josh is now in the army just to clear things up, so the government did accept him. glad the judge made the right decision.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.