'MP told me not to run against son'
12:00a.m. 15th February 2008
Christian Dickson... “It is true he likes to call in my office whenever I’m there to remind me I’m not able to win this election – the words he uses is I should ‘save my money and not run’ as I can’t win.''
Tom Hulett claims he was approached by State MP Steve Dickson asking him not to run against his son as he believed the youngster could not win.
His comments come as bloggers on thedaily.com.au expressed anger over allegations Mr Hulett bulied Christian Dickson, Queensland's youngest councillor, in a bid to dissuade him from standing.
In his response today, Mr Hulett said: "Steve Dickson has said to me words to the effect, "I will do whatever it takes to help Christian win."
"I have reported the matter to the CEO of Maroochy and asked it he had received any comments or reports or allegations on this matter.
His response was, "... I have never seen or heard any evidence or even any whispers of any action or comment about any discomfort or complaint between Cr Hulett and Cr Dickson."
"I think that says it all as one would expect some evidence either verbal or non-verbal if such a negative interaction occurred.
"Ted Hungerford claims I offered to support him ...
"Actually it was Steve Dickson MP who approached me asking me to run in any other Division except Christian's as he believed Christian could not win!''
"My only discussion about Christian was my comments that I hoped he was not going to run Christian into tens of thousands of debt if he couldn't win the election - certainly not just for Steve's ego,'' Mr Hulett blogged.
"Yes I did say words to the effect that I have paid my own way so far and was about to move into Stage 2 of my campaign and wouldn't it be better if I could have made a donation to him instead - and yes we both laughed at it and went in to the lunch meeting together!''
At least one fellow councillor, Ted Hungerford, has spoken out against the “bullying” antics of councillor Tom Hulett towards Christian Dickson.
Mr Hungerford also claimed Mr Hulett “offered me support to persuade Christian not to stand”.
Both Christian Dickson,20, and Tom Hulett are contesting Division 6 in the March 15 poll.
Mr Dickson’s father, state member for Kawana Steve Dickson said Mr Hulett made what he took to be an “in jest” offer to fund his next state election campaign, to the tune of $25,000, if he could persuade his son not to stand.
“It was said in the context he’s putting money towards his campaign to beat Christian that he could have used in my campaign,” Mr Dickson said.
“I didn’t take it as serious offer, I took it as a light-hearted statement more of a joke than anything and I wasn’t interested in listening more.”
Mr Hungerford said he had witnessed first-hand Mr Hulett’s “badgering” of Mr Dickson.
“Tom comes waltzing in Christian’s office and starts demoralising him and then he comes in to my office and tells me to tell him what to do.
“He’s doing the bullying when as a former school inspector he should know better.
“Tom came to me back in September or October and asked me to talk Christian out of running and offered me support with my division if I did.”
While fellow councillor Greg Fahey has not witnessed Mr Hulett bullying Mr Dickson first-hand, he had little doubt there was truth to the claims.
“Tom Hulett is one of the main reasons I am no longer standing for the super council,” Mr Fahey said.
“He is manipulative and he can twist his words.”
Christian Dickson reluctantly confirmed this week he been the subject of Mr Hulett’s jibes “on many occasions in my council office”.
“I would never have brought a private conversation to the attention of the media, however as you have asked me to confirm certain events, I feel that I have had no option but to reply honestly.
“It is true he likes to call in my office whenever I’m there to remind me I’m not able to win this election – the words he uses is I should ‘save my money and not run’ as I can’t win.
“He has suggested that if I don’t stand for this election he will ‘give it to me’ next time, but I said it doesn’t work like that.
“He said my dad (Steve Dickson) gave it to me last time which isn’t true – people voted for me not my father.
“I have heard rumours in the community that he has been telling people my father is supporting him and not me. But I take (his jibes) as a compliment.”
“It is my desire to run a clean campaign, free of negativity. It is not my style to denigrate my opponents, nor complain about their attempts at bullying me.
“I am here to serve our community and I just want to get on with the job in hand.”
Mr Hulett denied the accusations.
"There is no attempt at intimidation here. I encourage young Christian to run as this will be good experience for him in the future,” he said.
“We are in serious competition for this new, very serious, very complex council. I invite him to phone me anytime if he feels uncertain."
Mr Hulett is no stranger to intimidating his political opponents.
The Daily revealed an explosive letter from Mr Hulett to Mayor Joe Natoli written before the last election in which Mr Hulett’s derogatory remarks upset Mr Natoli so much, he sought the advice of his priest.
Comments in the letter included: “Get stuffed Joe” and “you have little going for you except by hiding behind your well-known and nice ’weather girl’ wife (news reader Rosanna Natoli).
Mr Natoli said yesterday he had not witnessed Mr Hulett badger or intimidate Mr Dickson. Councillors Bruce Dunne and Tony Northey also said they were not aware of this taking place.
Recent Comments
Where are you now Tom?
You haven't been talkative on the bogs of late.
I won't be voting for you.
One word - karma.
Tom Hulett commonly attempts to "bully" opponents by saying such things as: "Jeff, having read through the negativity of almost all your blogs, I now understand that is why people in that area tell me you will finish behind Tony in March 2008." (from a blog dated 21 November, 2007 at 9:57 a.m. - http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2007/nov... )
I could have used any number of similarly written examples, but it's no surprise to me that Tom's good mate Tony Northey denies any wrongdoing on Tom's part!
Greg Fahey's comments sadden me, but are not at all surprising.
Tom has an amazing talent to manipulate voters into voting for him, but fortunately only ever serves one term in office before they see through him.
Hopefully that record will continue in 2008.
Like Christian, I hate to be negative (and unlike Tom's criticism, the vast majority of my posts ARE positive ones and on a great variety of subjects, not just political stories), but it would be wrong of me not stand up for him here.
I admire your maturity Christian... good luck!
Jeff Watson.
Candidate for Division 8
"it's where I love to live!"
PS: I applaud the SCD in reporting the facts here.
If anyone should be saving their money and not entering the election, it's you Tom Hulett! Or is it you're simply frightened that Mr Dickson will beat you at the polls?
And before you say this is another attempt by the Daily to make you look bad, I'll tell you that in the past when you make a joke about apoplexy, I tore into you in a blog to here, and the Daily didn't publish it. But no one needs to try to make you look bad when you do such a fantastic job yourself!
I have met Christian a number of times since he was elected and found him to be a highly intelligent bright person with the capacity to listen and take advice - an attribute lacking in Mr. Hulett.
Trevor Thompson
Yandina
“I encourage young Christian to run as this will be good experience for him in the future.”
How contemptuous and conceited can he get? He used almost exactly the same condescending words against another young candidate who dared run against him in 1997, and that person went on to defeat him.
But let’s be fair. Big Tom is likely hurting right now, having worked the phones furiously over recent weeks trying to garner support for another pitch at the mayor position, only to come up empty.
And Chris Cummins’ candidature is salt in the wound. It must be a severe blow to his pride to have to resort to running as for mere councillor position yet again – but any power is good power.
No – it’s taken two stints in council and too many years, but the Sunshine Coast is waking up to who the real Tom Hulett is, and they are realising they don’t like what they see, and don’t want him in the new council.
He lost my support a year or two ago, His present attitude, as reported in The Daily, confirms my assessment of him and my voting intention.
I didn't think much of Christian Dickson being 'given' the seat from his father, but his responses in this interview (which I'm sure Tom will allege is biased) earn him plenty of credit and respect in my mind.
Unfortunately I am not in the relevant division, but I hope those residents who get a chance to show who they would trust, respect and want to represent them vote accordingly.
It's kind of like a lamb versus a wolf is sheep skin ... at least one has potential ! (you can decide which one represents whoever you would like it to)
Christian you are about the only current councillor which I wouldn't mind seeing back on the new council, so good luck - I don't think you will have much opposition and will probably win quite easily.
Toms' comments seem to have dried up about the same time people started disagreeing with him.
As for Tom Hulett's comments about Jeff Watson's posts, I find Jeff Watson's posts very positive; it’s a pity I’m not in his division to vote for him.
I've seen Tony Northey in action (if you can call it that) in a planning meeting that I was involved in. He should definitely go back to what he does best, which is selling bits of string and nails in a hardware store.
This is not looking good for Cr Hulett at this stage with the Council nominations closing next Tuesday. I wonder if he has paid his electoral deposit yet.
I noticed BigBob's comments in the Press yesterday that this type of behaviour against Council staff will not be tolerated in the new Council if he is elected Mayor.
To his credit, he would not name any of the past offenders who may have prompted his comments. I wonder if he knew that it was also happening to some of the Councillors as well as the staff.
Hopefully these bullying tactics will gain much public support for Christian, a a very young man with a lot of integrity who has the courage to stand against such people as Tom.
Don't give up Christian - we will be supporting you in our community
If this doesn't show voters what a bad representative and candidate he is for the division, then it will merely reiterate my belief that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Vote 1 for Christian and send a message to Tom.
This is no way to make decisions to better the community. I believe that the voters need to elect a council which will work TOGETHER for the betterment of the wider community.
Hullet, Rogerson and Northey have proved on many occasions that they are not willing to cooperate with, or respect, other people's opinions and therefore have had a detrimental effect over the last term of office.
Please elect new councillors who will be open and respectful and willing to put the communities needs above their own need for power.
election.
Not much of a choice so far is there.
We're not seeking to influence anything - just report what is being revealed to us. Readers and constituents can make their own minds up - Editor
At this point, I would just like to move forward with my campaign, which I personally believe should be run without negativity and the main focus should be on serving the ratepayer.
It is encouraging to read the comments of support on this blog and I sincerely thank the authors.
Christian Dickson
I had an 'early night' last night thinking there was nothing of major issue on today.
I was aware that the political game was on but anticipated it to be there tomorrow.
Little did I realise that the Daily has an even juicier anti-Hulett story for tomorrow!
AND from the same people!
For those who want the truth!
1. Steve Dickson has said to me words to the effect, "I will do whatever it takes to help Christian win." Now we have seen stage 1.
I have reported the matter to the CEO of Maroochy and asked it he had received any comments or reports or allegations on this matter. His response was, "... I have never seen or heard any evidence or even any whispers of any action or comment about any discomfort or complaint between Cr Hulett and Cr Dickson."
I think that says it all as one would expect some evidence either verbal or non-verbal if such a negative interaction occurred.
I contacted Cr Fahey also referred to in the article.
His written response to me referred to 'sundstrom massaging' of his words to get the messge she wanted.
I spoke with Greg only on Wednesday about his plans and even then I was encouraging him to re-consider running for Division 9. NONE of his reasons for not running was in anyway connected to me.
We agreed to try to 'keep in contact' in the future.
Editor's Note: It’s funny that Greg Fahey would suggest 'sundstrom massaging' of his words as Mr Fahey was sent a copy of the full article yesterday and was even contacted by “sundstrom” at 7.30pm last night to make sure he was happy with the article and comments attributed to him.
A much more mature response than we would have expected from your older opponent.
Actually it was Steve Dickson MP who approached me asking me to run in any other Division except Christian's as he believed Christian could not win!!!
AND THAT'S THE TRUTH!!!!!!
I recounted that to Ted and we discussed Steve's preference for a Tom, Christian and Ted combination.
Ted sees himself as the guru on all matters political and financial within the Councillors. And I find it amusing to talk to him in those terms.
Let me be clear - while Div 7 people have a candidate with extensive experience in the corporate and media world as Ken O'Flatherty and also a media expert like Lachlan Millar, how could they consider voting for Ted who whinges publicly that he cannot ever get any capital funding for his Division.
Me supporting Ted - NO WAY!
Et tu Brute!
Our most recent discussions were from Steve telling me how he was on top of everything in Parliament in Brisbane. How he was the leader in the forming of the new combined conservative Party and how he was directing all the new policy changes. "And the silly thing," he said "they (in Brisbane) don't even know I'm pulling the strings!"
My only discussion about Christian was my comments that I hoped he was not going to run Christian into 10's of thousands of debt if he couldn't win the election - certainly not just for Steve's ego.
Yes I did say words to the effect that I have paid my own way so far and was about to move into Stage 2 of my campaign and wouldn't it be better if I could have made a donation to him instead - and yes we both laughed at it and went in to the lunch meeting together! All smiles!
I have ALWAYS said to him, that if he felt he wanted to run - then HE SHOULD!
We talked then of the likelihood of a multi candidate election in our Division and the importance of preferences. He knew almost nothing of the political system so I remember our chatting about the options in depth.
Yes I did say that he had to make sure he scored well in the election - either to win or at least come near the top.
I did say that if he came towards the bottom, it would be bad for future political chances but if he did well - either won or came close then he would be seen as a credible candidate in the future.
Most of the negative comments from Hungerford and young Christian come before the boundaries were even finalised and certainly before nominations were called!
I have had fewer than 10 discussions with Christian - perhaps as few as 6 or 7 over the last 6 months!
I have ALWAYS said to Christian, "if you want to go for it then do!!"
For example - I gave Christian some political advice recently and he came up to me about a week ago and thanked me for the advice saying it was most helpful.
Earlier during one of our talks he also said, "You have never given me bad advice yet - in fact you have given me better advice than any other Councillor!"
AND THAT IS FACT!!!!
If he denies these he is not being truthful.
I shared some of the info with Christian even telling him where he was scoring well and why and he told me he "He started doorknocking but gave up in some areas because they all wanted to vote for you!"
As a former teacher, I have a reputation of mentoring and until this nonsense, I would have expected Christian to agree.
I have NO DOUBT that Christian has been 'put up to this' and that it is other egos at play pushing him!
This is when everyone gets to see the real Hullet that is normally so carefully camouflaged.
Everyone else is to blame/it's the Daily out to get me/let me tell you the REAL truth/let me tell what sneaky stuff he said/she said/you can't trust them/bleat bleat bleat.
We all know that Teflon never lasts. As the pressure and reality of his impending departure loom, "Teflon Tom" has started unpeeling in a major way...
"Oh tragic days - all that family sugar cane land I'll never get to develop."
Another trait of a bully is they never believe they have done the wrong thing. In fact, they usually see themselves as the victim of other peoples' conspiracies - think about that as you have another read of Tom's 'contributions' to this forum.
Can't wait to see how the SCD stitches him up tomorrow (well, that will be his view, the rest of us are just intrigued by how much more despicable some councillors can behave).
Keep on plugging away, Christian and the Daily.
Ask your father to stop running half-page newspaper ads, funded by the State Govt but featuring you, in areas that are also in my Division!
Christian meet me face to face in debate in front of our Division 6 community - not a rent-a-crowd but Division 6 residents only!
I will arrange it and fund it fully. I'll send you the details as soon as it is set up!
I look at the blogs and every time that Tom writes in telling people that they are wrong AGAIN he certainly gets hammered.
I realise that this is only a small cross section of voters but if this is carried to the 'nth degree Tom is going to be embarrassed after the next election in four weeks.
At my daily coffee 'conference' after a swim at Mooloolaba I don't think that Tom is the flavour of the month in his division. One thing about Tom is that he certainly is a one off character and he gets the bloggers tapping away.
As predicted by a previous contributor Uncle Tom has hit the keyboard protesting against The Daily, and whinging about others.
Will there be public meetings held for the support of Tom allowing them to question his behaviour and attributes so all will witness his demeanour when confronted with matters concerning the people in Div Six?
I have been impressed with his integrity and maturity. The same cannot be said for Tom.
I haven't agreed with a lot of his recent "improvements" for our area, nor have I agreed with his assessments of the needs of our area.
I understand that Christian may turn to his father for advice, but this doesn't mean he will become a puppet for him...what child thesedays does everything their parent tells them!
I don't like manipulation, and I feel that the councillors job is to represent the people and give voice to
THEIR concerns, not just their own opinions and choices.
Give us Big Bob for the Job and let Christian represent our division and let Bob teach him how to connect and truly be the voice for his area.
"Steve Dickson and I frequently chat - I thought we were mates!"
Woe is me - I've been wronged by someone I trusted.
"Et tu Brute!"
Let me briefly remind you the soaring intelligence you are dealing with here.
"Our most recent discussions were from Steve telling me how he was on top of everything in Parliament in Brisbane. How he was the leader in the forming of the new combined conservative Party and how he was directing all the new policy changes. "And the silly thing," he said "they (in Brisbane) don't even know I'm pulling the strings!" "
See it's him you can't trust not me! He's the one trying to be the puppet-master - he stopped listening to me.
"My only discussion about Christian was my comments that I hoped he was not going to run Christian into 10's of thousands of debt if he couldn't win the election - certainly not just for Steve's ego."
Because I'm so obviously a shoe-in that anyone else daring to run against me is clearly stupid for wasting their money.
"Yes I did say words to the effect that I have paid my own way so far and was about to move into Stage 2 of my campaign"
Stage 2 see - it's a carefully coordinated professional you are dealing with here - big bucks, big brain, dare you try to compete with me?
"...and wouldn't it be better if I could have made a donation to him instead"
I was careful not to word it in a way that could be used against me, but I dangled the carrot to see...
"...and yes we both laughed at it and went in to the lunch meeting together! All smiles!"
It didn't work. But I switched on the 1000 watt charm globes anyway - dontcha love me/I'm such a nice guy/please don't scroll up and read those previous messages - I was angry and should have cooled down first.
...And so on. Just keep applying this sort of analysis to Hullet's posts and you'll soon the pattern. Leopard - spots.
Nice way to try to eliminate dad from the equation, Tom. Strike at his position to try to hurt his son's career - you're a nice guy, aren't you ?!
How do you think that this will translate to the ballot box ? If we were to continue our cricket analogy from a few weeks ago...perhaps you are going through a bit of a form slump and need to sit on the sidelines for a while.
If you spent only half as much time doing your damned job as Councillor as you do scheming and twisting things your way, you'd do a better job and dare I say it, be far better thought of as well.
Let it go old man .. you're history.
You do not present a gracious argument - "he said, she said" stuff belongs in the school yard. So for goodness sake grow up & get on with doing your job of representing your constituents & treat the personality issues in a manner more becoming of someone your age.
Christian may have a lot to learn about political process, from the sound of things he is going through a steep curve. A mentor - self professed or otherwise - is supposed to play a positive role in the lives of those influenced; not rely on backhanded compliments or act out of fear of being eclipsed by superior popularity or talent.
The offer of a debate sounds more like an opportunity for you play the "enthusiasm or experience" card rather than constructive argument about your vision, policies, & positive change you can bring to your division.
No-one likes a cranky old man, they are normally self-serving in their belligerence anyway!
where's my slapping glove?
On checking out other websites to which I'm interested in, I note the contests in the Brisbane City Council where party politics is clearly visible.
As I will give careful consideration to the detail within the news item and within the various responses from readers, anyone is entitled to stand for a parliamentary or council seat. Why should average Australians be prevented from contesting a seat and having barriers put in place by others?
Oh Dear, Tom.
There are some chickens coming home to roost!!!! You really get off on the late night telephone conversations scheming away with your mates, like Rob Purvis, the dude who was found to have stalked Alison Grosse, don't you.
Just what did you discuss with Mr Purvis on those many very early morning occasions? It seems you are both very late night owls. What do such owls talk about, especially when one is a stalker of Grosse, and the other is a fierce political opponent of Grosse?
Hulett has shot himself in the foot so many times he won't be able to walk to a ballot box. That should make the votes for him zero instead of the one I anticipated
Just stand back and watch the self-destruction, it is easier than blogging and just as much fun
Both have egos bigger than their fat heads. Schoolyard bully-boy attitudes, shouting their narrow-minded opinions & carrying a whole lot of bad karma. Surely there are better candidates available to make competent decisions on this region's future?
C'mon where are the fine upstanding members of this community? All you decent-minded, intelligent locals with so much to say, hurry up & put up your hands up to run this joint properly before we end up with these clowns running the show! An absolute nightmare…
Somewhat reminiscent of Desperate House Wives or The Bold and Beautiful.....maybe even Beauty and the Beast ?
Ed . Please note your posting which you added to "One Term Tom's" blog at 12:38 would be missed my most of those who had been following the unfolding events. Whilst so very informative;
it would be missed/overlooked by many.
Could I respectfully suggest that your comments also be additionally appended and referenced to the blog and the earlier time in question.
As for rocafo from BLACK MOUNTAIN
"local councils should not be the place for any members of a political party, past or present. "
Mate, wake up and smell the roses, the current mess has been enacted by a systematic voting of so called independants who have had obvious business and political ties.
Had electors been voting along party lines with stated policies, people might have some greater chance of affecting the political outcomes.
For instance could you tell me which group of Councillors in this election stand for "Future Sustainability" ?
Let's take it further, how would either Robert or Giovanni keep their electoral promises when they hold one meagre vote in any council legislation?
Little wonder the calibre of candidates comes under scrutiny in the eleventh hour.
It's not my division but makes for more than an interesting read.
But at the end of the day the current system has little chance of stopping, Woolies, Yaroomba highrise, bio reactors or any other blight that your incumbent Councillor has only one vote to pit against.
If we're all barking up the wrong tree and another tree falls in the forest , did it really happen ?
The more Tom Hulett talks the more he exposes himself as a foolish and malevolent person.
Hand him another shovel as he is doing a very fine job at digging a gigantic hole to bury himself in.
Unfortunately he is so removed from decent behaviour he can't even see the damage he does himself every time he opens his oversized mouth.
Then again wasn't the Mooloolaba-Mountain Creek Progress Association born days before the last election. Just in time to support Tom, but not long enough to stand scrutiny, I recall.
Perhaps another rabbit is lurking at the bottom of this fellow's oversized hat, he is going to need it
Ron Campbell *
Candidate for Division 5
* if elected looking forward to a Hulett free Council
"Christian meet me face to face in debate in front of our Division 6 community - not a rent-a-crowd but Division 6 residents only!"
surprised me as would that rule you out of the meeting as you are not a division 6 resident?
Is this what you have to offer our division? Abusive behaviour towards other members of the community and posts on the daily website of utter verbal diarrhea?
So apparently you haven't abused anybody, so why would they said that you have then. How did this actually start if you didn't decide to harrass him by calling his office. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
I don't care if Kevin Rudd is your mother, i'm still not voting for you.
I'm very happy with the way Christian Dickson has represented my division in the recent past and plus he opened the door for me at the petrol station once, so i think he's top bloke.
Try doing something positive without muddying the waters on others to gain election again. You don't seem to be focussed on this side of your role as a councillor.
I agree with most - bring in Bob as Mayor - at least he brings common sense and a calm voice with control. Someone needs to crack the whip on the cowboys who are out for themselves and the glory, not the ratepayers. Gee Tom is that you? Get over it and get on with the job your paid for or get out.
I don't see any comments here supporting Hulett.
Have you not got the message yet Tom?
Crawl back under the rock from which you emerged and save your money.
The CEO said he has found absolutely no evidence whatsoever for even discomfort (mush less bullying).
Mayor Joe Natoli said the allegations were unfounded (the Daily refused to print his comments!)
Cr Greg Fahey said he saw no evidence of bullying.
Many other Councillors who contacted me said the same type of commenting - suggesting this is just a CHEAP POLITICAL BEAT-UP to get page 1 attention.
Now let's turn the spotlight onto those who made the false allegations.
Yes - Steve Dickson did beg me 'not to run against his son'. Steve did tell me that he would do whatever it took to help his son.
Yes Hungerford is running as a team with Dickson. Hungerford is angry that I am supporting Ken O'Flaherty or Lachlan Millar and definitely NOT him.
Sundstrom has NEVER written a positive story with me in it!!
I am surprised young Christian would have joined this disgraceful act.
Please do not reward the guilty just because you would like a 'free kick' at me!
- Tom you are unbelievable - if your blogs on this latest issue are not further evidence of a bullyboy mentality... 'meet me face to face', 'stop hiding behind your dad' etc etc, I don't know what is.
The fact that other councillors are not brave enough to come out and say what has been going on behind the scenes just shows how intimidated they must feel perhaps.
You can blame Sundstrom all you like but the bloggers have seen what you are like in the past two days - they've made up their minds. It's time you quit blaming the Daily and started taking one, long hard look in the mirror, for your own good. I believe you have a lot to offer if you focused your energy in the right direction. But at present you seem to be showing a fatal personality flaw that, well quite ugly to watch. - Editor
Sadly you are all wasting your time, Tom is Tom and as hell bent as he is on losing this election, let him do it, he doesn't need any help from the rest of us.
Goodbye Tom
It's like watching a "bad guy" in a movie spraying his Uzi in all directions but hitting nothing...
And isn't it interesting the total absence of public confirmations of any of his claims from those he quotes above? Dear Daily: are ANY of them prepared to go on the record confirming his claims?
Keep it up Hullet. You are helping immeasurably.
Keep guessing too.
To call this "bully-ing" is "bull-sh!t" if you ask me...
Find me one positive thing this paper has said about tom hulett in the past year?
if you think this paper (and most papers really) do not have certain agendas then you need to go back to school and learn about media... i think i learnt that in grade 8 !! WAKE UP !!!
this isnt an election to see who becomes the next girl guide leader...
its politics !! Grown up, full blown attack the other, be attacked politics...
candidate vs canditate...
trying to discredit the opposition goes part and parcel with politics... always has been.. always will be... (think kevin07 drueling at a strip club after he had a dinner with the devil...)
To Christian Dickson:
if you cant handle another candidate (be it any canditate... not just Tom Hulett) telling you not to run because its not worth your money...
then the only running you should be doing is running all the way home to mummy and daddy...
They'll put the band aid on for you little fella... till then please, please, please stop crying...
if you do still want to run for council... my advice to you would be to have a big glass of 'harden up', grow up, and leave your father out of it.. remembering that you are now 20... its time to stop sucking the nipple and become your own man...
and remember... its council politics... not girl guides Christian... so please no more crying over such petty comments...
until then you will never have my vote...
and for those who care to know... yes i did vote for Christian in the last election... but you certainly wont be getting my vote...
And I'd suggest that it is Hullet himself who has here clearly demonstrated he can't hack it when the heat is turned back on himself - he can dish it out but he can't take it.
As for it being "politics", I think that people like to think of their local government as being sufficiently close to - well - the coalface as to expect that the people will treat each other in a civil manner, will "play the ball not the man" and that it will not degenerate to the sorts of levels it has in Maroochy over recent years as a result of Hullet's behind the scenes manipulation.
I put it to you that the clear rejection of party political involvement in this upcoming election is evidence of that over-arching community attitude towards their local government.
What a load of absolute garbage, you obviously haven't absorbed anything. Christian has never made one comment in the way you suggest. The Daily always give credit where credit is due (it's just that not much is due in this case). You are obviously one of Tom's cronies.
Keep up the good work SCD, you represent the majority!
I've never seen politically one-sided reporting as seen here on The Daily.
Trying to make mincemeat of Hulett because of those supposed bullying tactics, borders on being ridiculous
Í´m sorry, I know it would be a pretty big task to handle the whole division by myself. I have to pose the question: if his father was not on the council, would Cr Dickson still be getting votes from the Coast?
Think back to when you were 20 - do you think you would have been able to handle the responsibility?
Cut the umbilical cord buddy - if you´re up to the challenge, stop having a cry to the newspaper, and stop getting daddy to fund full page advertisements in the newspaper!!
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.