Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
6:23PM Friday 29 August, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Possible shower min 12° - max 22°

I wasn't invited to the party: Natoli


Maroochy Mayor Joe Natoli wants the cost of a planned staff send-off slashed and has revealed that he and other councillors weren’t even invited to the party.

Mr Natoli said today that he knew nothing about the planned $50,000-$60,000 celebration until yesterday.

The plans weren’t discussed at a council meeting, but were considered an “operational matter” and decided on by the council’s CEO and senior managers.

“In fact, councillors weren’t even invited originally,” Mr Natoli said. “When I spoke to my PA yesterday and asked if she’d pencilled it in my diary, she said: ‘You’re not invited!’.

“The managers thought we’d be too busy door-knocking and wouldn’t be interested.”

Mr Natoli said he believed it was important that staff were rewarded for their efforts and that some type of celebration was held to mark the end of the Maroochy Council.

He said the funds to be used for the party had already been allocated for staff training and rewards, however he thought the $40-a-head cost was excessive. Mr Natoli has asked the authority’s managers to look at ways of reducing the total cost of the function to around $20,000.

“I said they need to be mindful that there are people out there who are doing it tough and who may have concerns.

“But I do support the council rewarding our staff … every organisation should look after their staff and try to build morale. It won’t be easy in the first 12 months of the new council and we need staff to be in a really positive frame of mind.”

Earlier, acting CEO Greg Laverty said the Maroochy staff gathering would acknowledge the contribution of past and present employees during the shire’s 117-year history.

“It is very important that our history, culture, achievements and people, both past and present, are recognised and valued for their work with Maroochy Council before they commence work with their new employer, the Sunshine Coast Regional Council,” Mr Laverty said.

“This event, which is part of our change management program, is an important step in helping staff move towards a new and larger organisation.”

The three Coast councils have planned to spend a total of around $140,000 on send-offs for their staff.

Local government minister Warren Pitt criticised lavish pre-amalgamation parties yesterday and urged Caboolture Shire to drop plans for a $52,000 farewell to staff.

All staff have been guaranteed their jobs for at least three years under amalgamation provisions with some ratepayers questioning councils spending money on send-offs when no-one is leaving.

Noosa mayor Bob Abbot told thedaily.com.au today that Noosa believed the money was well spent as it would help boost morale for council staff going into an amalgamated council.

"There was low morale in the organisation (about the forced merger) and we believed it was appropriate to celebrate 98 years of contribution to the community,'' Mr Abbot said.

He said the council had a barbecue for staff and was also holding a community celebration which was open to the public. He said the total bill would be about $30,000.

"I don't think that's inappropriate at all,'' Mr Abbot said.

He said Noosa Council staff had put in a lot of hard work for the community over the years and particularly in recent times preparing for an amalgamated council. He said he was not aware of one complaint from the public.

Mr Abbot said the staff party was a good opportunity to talk to Noosa Council employees about the way forward under the new council structure. "I think it was a valuable exercise.''

He rejected suggestions by rival Mr Natoli that Noosa Council was the least prepared for amalgamation because it had spent so much effort fighting it.

"We fought the fight. We fought it as far as we could but 95% of the people I talk to in Noosa say 'we didn't want it but let's get on with it.''

Coast businessman Ken Reed, of Reed Property Group, said he saw nothing wrong with the send-offs as long as costs were kept within reason.

Mr Reed said his company spent about $20,000 a year on its Christmas Party to acknowledge staff and reward them for their efforts with awards.

Reed has about 100 staff compared to Maroochy's 1500. Maroochy will spend about $60,000 on its celebration.

The company also often put on events for staff to acknowledge their hard work.

"I don't think it is inappropriate to have a farewell.''

Caboolture pulled the plug on its party for staff and their families after the minister labelled the outlay “excessive and over the top’’.

Caloundra council will hold a $30,000 community celebration on March 9 and spend $20,000 on a staff celebration on March 14.

CEO Gary Storch said amalgamation marked a turning point in the region’s history and staff deserved to be thanked for their magnificent contribution.

“We’ve had staff who have been with us for 30 or 35 years and we want to thank them for a fantastic effort,” Mr Storch said.

“Anyone who criticises that does not understand the incredible effort our people have put in because they love their community.”

About 350 employees and family members turned out for Noosa’s staff function last weekend, which cost between $20,000 and $25,000. A further $10,000 will fund filming of the final council meeting, followed by a dinner for past and present councillors.

Caboolture Shire Council was planning throw a bash for 900 staff – spending $1,600 on clowns and magicians alone - at the Caboolture Showgrounds on March 12, three days before the poll.

The party was supposed to mourn the end of the 128-year-old council, which will merge with Pine Rivers Shire and Redcliffe under the state government’s sweeping council reforms.

But Caboolture mayor Joy Leishman yesterday pulled the pin on the party following negative media coverage.

Local Government Minister Warren Pitt said the council had “made the right decision, even if it is to overturn a wrong one”.

“I simply don’t believe the council could justify spending $52,000 of ratepayers’ money on a staff function such as this,” Mr Pitt said.

He said other councils were also commemorating their end.

“But the cost of the function planned in this particular case was excessive,” Mr Pitt said.

Related stories

Bob versus Joe in race for mayor

Full list of those running for Sunshine Coast council

Natoli vows to unite 'welcoming council'

Biggest loser joins election line-up

For our election coverage and candidates nominating for council, visit our election '08 page.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 21 February, 2008 at 12:14 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Am I, as a ratepayer funding one of these parties, invited?

Of course not, and naturally Joe has to have the most lavish party, spending our money like there is no tomorrow.

Oh, wait. That's right. There is no tomorrow for Joe; after 15 March anyway.
on 21 February, 2008 at 5:45 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Even after considering the merits.

Its still a waste of money.

Do something that costs a lot less or not at all.
on 21 February, 2008 at 6:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I don't want to comment on whether this level of expenditure is justified or not. I do have sympathy for what all of the Council employees are going through emotionally at present. But I do have one question.

It is clear that all or many amalgamating Councils in QLD planned to have one of these parties. They obviously thought that this was quite OK. Why is it that Warren Pitt and the rest of us were only alerted to it yesterday?

Is the outrage more about the amount of money being spent than the fact that they are having the parties at all? I suppose that they could have had a BYO party or picnic ?!
on 21 February, 2008 at 7:04 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
A bit of perspective is required. Any decent private sector employer would mark such an occasion of change. $45 a head is not outrageous.

Consider the millions wasted on the undemocratic amalgamation process, the consultants fees, the junket study trips, dinners etc. $52 000 is a drop in the ocean compared to the largess State pollies lavish on themselves. $52 000 wouldn't cover some state and federal politician's annual stationary and travel allowances. Not to forget the outrageous superannuation deals they've given themselves. Sounds like cheap and nasty politics coming from a State politician with his own snout in the public trough.
on 21 February, 2008 at 7:09 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Can anyone tell me in the history of business or government where the company has lavishly put on a party at the expense of the ratepayer or shareholder.

The blatant disregard of expenditure by all governments is one of the disturbing developments in all tiers of government in Australia.

The elected representatives who approve expenditure having forgotten it is not their money. It is money collect by levy, rates or taxes to supply services to the people.

Those elected are to manage and improved service supplied within that tier of government and employees are there to implement those services, they are the people’s representatives.

We are told that the employees of the three councils will all be employed by the regional council. In fact all that is happening in the offices is a change of name.

I am not supporting the expenditure outlined in The Daily.
on 21 February, 2008 at 7:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'll say it again.

Some are quick to speak here and no doubt there are other considerations to be taken in consideration.

It's very easy to be lured into villanising Councils,
even by a complete hippocrite.

Losing something like $20 million per year in water income will affect the bottom line budget of those Council staff. There is little doubt that the State Labour Government who has pilfered this asset will eventually hock it off to private industry.
After which time we will all be at a disadvantage, we know that anything privatised or deregulated ends up costing ratepayers more than it did before, be it airports, electricity, milk , bread, communications or banking.

The Beattie amalgamation legacy was alleged to be a way to create greater financial sustainability and to promote stronger Councils. One only needs to watch the evil Sheriff in Robin Hood see an example of what of absolute power can absolutely deliver to a powerless populace.

So now we see a bunch of Local Goverment employees expected to carry on business as usual whilst additionally bearing the cross of amalgamation whilst also having their budget fleeced of the water income.

Now who do we think might be fraying around the edges over the next three years?

It certainly won't be those throwing the stones.

I agree with Local Government Minister Warren Pitt, we should all "contact our elected representatives" especially Mr Pitt, and request details of THEIR entertainment expenditure. While your at it ask how much we're paying for vehicles, airfares, the parlimentary dining facilities and any other perks.
After all many TAXpayers would be greatly concerned to learn of the amount of money to be spent on THE STATE GOVERNMENT's ongoing, never ending party, and would want to voice their protests.
“I think TAXpayers need to make their feelings known when it comes to this sort of spending of their money.”

The Council employees are now facing an uncertain future and a mountainous merger task.
Little wonder they're holding a wake.

To take a cheap shot, ....... is just the PITTS !
on 21 February, 2008 at 7:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
This is still the ratepayers money and there will still be a Council. Why isn't it just left in the budget for the future? I'm sick and tired of this spend up mentality. Then they will justify a rate increase when there is no justifiable reason for one. With 1/3 less Councillors we should actually have a rate decrease if anything with the savings in wages alone - as if!!!
on 21 February, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Jason, from Pomona, you said it yourself, "Any decent private sector employer would mark such an occasion of change ..." - PRIVATE SECTOR.

The council is not private sector, they do not operate on a typical supply/demand, supplier/customer, product cost/mark up basis. They get their money from the public via rates, levies etc.

At least Caloundra City Council has earmarked the lions share for a "community celebration", not just the self-serving, slush fund the others are planning.

Whatever money each council spends is less money that the new council will have to provide services - it is as simple as that !
on 21 February, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Rate payers who work for private companies don't get this luxury. Why should they pay for their 'servants' (which is who you are when you work for the government) to have expensive send-offs?
on 21 February, 2008 at 8:23 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
'Jason of Pomona' - I certainly don't object to the council employees having a party. I just don't want to pay for it.
on 21 February, 2008 at 8:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
You all seem to be comparing the council with any other company when organizing leaving/moving on/whatever you want to call it parties. The one thing you seem to be forgetting is that private companies make their own profit and as such can do whatever they like with their money, the council however do not make any money of their own and are spending my/your/ratepayers money, which is not theirs to do entirely as they please with. What makes me laugh is that nothing is going to change for the time being, they will merge, throw the party and return the following day to the same seat, same job, same role, nothing will have change at that point apart from the name of the council and a few letter heads etc.

The mayor needs to be held accountable for wasting our/your/ratepayers money in what is as far as I am concerned theft, they are taking the money and spending on themselves when it is not their money to spend.

At least this there will be one thing gained from all this, the downfall of Joe, after this I am guessing no one in their right mind is going to vote for him.
on 21 February, 2008 at 9:01 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
There seems to be criticism of Joe and Maroochy however if you compare expenditure to staff then it is not lavish as Cooroy_Kid infers.
I notice Noosa has already spent theres with not a complaint and they are still going to spend another $10,000 on filming a meeting!!!!
My problem with this is that it is a community that is changing and therefore why not community celebrations. The staff are still there for another 3 years.
on 21 February, 2008 at 9:08 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Council workers are entitled to be offended by the mean spiritedness of this story and some of the knee-jerk reactions to it. Fortunately their jobs are secure for three years at least, something that Joe Natoli should remember when he's telling public meetings of his vision for a super council workforce drawn from the best of the old ones.
on 21 February, 2008 at 9:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Private companies are often owned by "shareholders" and ratepayers are exactly the same. You are shareholders in the organisation that is called Council.

People's jobs are one of the most important things in their lives often coming second place to family. Put yourself in the shoes of the employees (or servants as some so kindly put it) and think about their situations. Nobody can deny that it is the employees of the Councils that are bearing the brunt of this ill thought out and rushed amalgamation. And from all accounts the staff losses in Councils have been quite high since amalgamations have been announced.

Like others have pointed out, it's all about change management and I for one agree with the holding of these celebrations of the organisation that is ending and the welcoming of the organisation that is beginning.
on 21 February, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If it is such a great bonding/thankyou exercise, then the relevant people should be happy to kick in their fair share and not use ratepayers money on such a dubious scheme. I don't recall this item ever being floatted by the various councillors when they were seeking our votes.

So come on Natoli and your current sidekick, Acting CEO Greg Laverty, dip into your own pockets for your grand farewell and invite attendees to pay their way if they want to attend. There are too many unfunded needs in our area that could better use this money.

As far as I am concerned Natoli has been a drain on the ratepayers for too long and I can't wait to use my vote to kick him off the gravy train.
on 21 February, 2008 at 10:22 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Excuse Me !!! Why is everyone ignoring my BYO Picnic suggestion ?

- The Councils control all the venues.
- The CEO's PA can organise the ladies to bring a plate.
- The boys can bring a wine and a couple of beers (or visa versa)
- The Lions can run the bar.
- I'm a member of the Sunshine Coast Blues Club. They would probably be over the moon to provide the entertainment - gratis.

Bingo! It's organised! Budget - Zero.
The Lions make a bit of pocket money and everyone else goes home happy and "moved on".
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:01 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
You've got my vote Bob! You are the man for the job!
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:07 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Atapro. I think your idea is brilliant!!
What I think would also be great is to have a joint gathering for all the councils as all these people will soon be working together and would give them a great opportunity to meet each other.
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:16 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I agree with Jason from Pomona - even though councils are publicly funded they should still be run like a private sector business, thus producing budget surpluses.

I have no problem with council commemorating such an occasion be it a community &/or private function. I am sure each council department would celebrate year's end with a Christmas party in recognition of staff contribution, probably out of a staff welfare budget allocation. The staff all come back to work the following Monday, so what is the difference given that the amalgamation is a once-off event, not just an annual celebration. I think councils are well justified to reward their staff; however to bring some balance their does need to be a level of restraint shown. From what I have read this appears to have been the case - on a per employee head basis $45 is good value for a family day out.

Eugene raises a fair point - what about some of our state & federal representatives staff welfare expenditure, etc. You don't have to go too far to hear some state/federal expenditure horror story, now there is some lavish wasting of public money!
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I like many others dont believe in a lavish party to celebrate councillors and employees. The history remains . Maybe a more realistic amount to a community standard.

Where did the money come from anyway ? Was it last new year's funds, if so give them the fireworks not pour it into our over conjested fishermans road sewerage plant (do the maths).

Most employers don't even acknowledge 10 years service, so no slushy eviction parties.

No offence Joe Natoli better brush up on your fruiterer skills. Now give BIG BOB the top job, super council MAYOR , I'm sure he won't abuse the privilege.
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Thank you Stelis. I like your idea too. A bit of lateral thinking.

They could probably also sell raffle tickets so that the Councils could make a bit of a profit on whole affair. You could tell that Mr whats-his-name...Pitt to stick that in his pipe.
on 21 February, 2008 at 11:39 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
All I can say, in closing, is :

Don't make the Grumpies have to come back there and organise this for you. It'll get ugly...I promise you.
on 21 February, 2008 at 12:13 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm not a Joe Natoli supporter but I do believe in fairness so before eveyone attacks Joe over the send off party, consider this. The decision to run such an event may not have been a Council decision.

Maybe a search of the recent council meeting minutes might reveal whether it was or not however I don't believe it was.

I believe it was a decision made by the Acting CEO or the senior management team of the organisation.

And on the fairness bandwagon, I fail to see how anyone can attack Joe Natoli over this yet leave Bob Abbot out of it as Noosa has already had their "send off" party earlier. Probably to avoid this sort of media attention or bad publicity.

- As I updated story will soon reveal, Mr Natoli says he knew nothing about the party until yesterday when contacted by the media. It was a decision made by the corporate, not political arm, of the council we are told - Editor
on 21 February, 2008 at 12:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I have worked in both the private and government sectors and attended similar 'parties' at both.

Ratepayers have an expectation that Councils will operate like private companies and provide services accordingly, but on the other hand condemn them when they employ private company practices.

Events like this provide an opportunity to recognise and reward staff for their efforts and loyalty. My experience in the state & local governmentareana is that reward is infrequent.

That’s why private enterprises (not all) are often a more attractive employer than govt. Ratepayers would be screaming if there was a mass exodus of Council staff and services were reduced or not provided.

Everyone appears to be concerned about spending ratepayer’s money on an event that does not benefit them personally.

If that is the case, then these same ratepayers should be asking Councils to stop funding expensive events like the Fireworks shows at Mooloolaba and Coolum each New Years Eve.

Maybe the business, hospitality and tourism communities should foot the bill as they are they ones obtaining a financial gain from these events.

Weather cancelled last New Years Eve Fireworks and saw many business owners complaining about income loss to their business. I appreciate many locals do benefit, in the form of wages, from these events, but it is the businesses that take the lions share. Not all ratepayers benefit from these end of year parties.

No-one likes paying rates, but then I’d rather pay rates for the services provided today than go back in time where we burnt our garbage in incinerators in the backyard, dropped sawdust in the can, ran out of water in the tank and travelled on dirt potholed roads. People seem to forget what their rates provide.

In the words of Richard Branson ‘happy staff translates into happy customers”.

Let them have their end of an era 'party’.

- Couldn't agree with you more. Well said - Editor
on 21 February, 2008 at 12:40 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Just an observation.

It could be arranged as a BYO picnic.

But then why not only give tax deductability for a 4 cylinder vehicle where say a Real estate Agent has a top of the range V8 Merc to ferry prospective clients around the district.
Or even better the clients could bring their own car and meet them there. That would be a BYO attitude for conducting business!

We don't hear anyone complaining about that piece of corporate welfare.

Maybe we should be getting churlish about any company vehicle being seen parked on the beach at Double Island point, surely they can't all be there on company business.

What about the Professional junket write offs, conference at Vegas anyone, seminar in Tahiti or just the littany of friday "Business" lunches occurring every week.

Any concientious objectors here?

These perks all contribute to company profit with the funding shifted straight out of the taxpayer's pockets.

I imagine that the Council does make an income by way of fees and charges and the level of professionalism and customer service initiatives has certainly contributed to greater levels of productivity in the past decade.

Maybe they could reimpose the "Tourism Levy" back on the business' who make sunch great profit from our community.

That money could be better spent on a one off gesture of appreciation to show that the community values the efforts of these dedicated staff.

Or maybe the levy could go towards some swings in the local park.

Even better let the business who feed off of our community keep the money and upgrade next years lease vehicle.
on 21 February, 2008 at 1:04 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
How about using the "party $$$'s" to fix some potholes that have been left after the recent rain? Menzies Road and David Low Way has one that re-occurs after each day of rain!
on 21 February, 2008 at 1:16 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
It seems that this party is to lift the morale. "Every organisation should look after their staff and try to build morale." I wonder why the morale of the council staff is so low, would it be because a certain councillor has been proven to be bullying them.

Geez i it is only fair that this councillor and his other bully mates should foot the bill for the party considering they have caused the uncomfortable working conditions.

If you are jumping to the conclusion that i am talking about Tom Hullet that is not correct as it seems he only "allegedly" bullies fellow councillors, their fathers and fellow bloggers on the daily. (If you are unsure as to whom i am really referring to please refer to article http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2008/jan...)
on 21 February, 2008 at 2:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Gosh, reading the blogs of late, we seem now to have a go at anything & everyone... & do so ever so passionately.

This is an end of an era (more or less), - the Sunshine Coast is the best in Australia & we have our councillors, councils & all council workers to thank for their part in making it so (no matter how bad you may think they are).

I have no concern thinking that there's going to be a party... - I do have concern only that this wasn't sanctioned by Natoli right from the start.
on 21 February, 2008 at 2:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Many years ago when I worked in a State Government Department our social events such as Christmas Parties, Family BBQ's etc. were organized through our departments social club and paid for by the employees via weekly raffles etc.and a social fund that we were happy to pay a small amount into each week.

The members of the social club did a great job and their efforts were always appreciated.

In eleven years I never attended a function that was actually paid for by the Department and never expected to. Stelis had a great idea but it seems to me that there is an expectation of entitlement in our culture that wasn't apparent a few years ago.
on 21 February, 2008 at 3 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
He said the funds to be used for the party had already been allocated for staff training and rewards.

$30,000 Bar-B-Q !! Thats an awful lot of snags .
Who authorised who to authorise this ?
on 21 February, 2008 at 3:03 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
A party for what? The exclusive who think they own the shire and are paid to serve the people not developers? If there is to be any celebration, let everyone join in and cut rates for a year.
on 21 February, 2008 at 4:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'd love to hear from the staff themselves .

I wonder if they had asked for the celebration or the reward or does the Council management have a policy of reward and recognition not unlike Robert Abbot and his management team.

The expectation of entitlement is a furphy, it has always been there but for a select few, what we now see is entitlement becoming a growth industry.

More lurks and perks filtering down from the top.

Bigger bonuses even if the company is going backwards or making losses. The bonuses and golden handshakes are getting bigger.

I can't help but wonder if our business leaders are taking any responsibility in shaping the growth of this anomaly.

It seems to be a case of "I'm right Jack" .

When we constantly see the poor examples being set then the standard is lowered and the feeding frenzy begins.

When the masters of the universe start bringing in chocolate crackles and pikelets to their board meetings and when the friday lunch is a BBQ in the park then everyone has a licence to throw stones.

Maybe the Lions Club or Rotary could start providing for the corporate boxes and we could have the CWA ladies bringing in cuppas instead of champagne.

I agree with Brewer, Invite everyone and cut rates for a year.

Free rocking horse manure for everyone!
on 21 February, 2008 at 5:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
At my work (which is not a Local government) any work functions we have, we pay for ourselves; everyone brings a plate. Also, we have a social club that raises money throughout the year for functions, but also donates money to charity. Why doesn't council do the same instead of expecting ratepayers to fund their parties.
on 22 February, 2008 at 9:32 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Did Caloundra City have a huge "end of an era" private party when we changed from names from a shire to a city?
on 22 February, 2008 at 9:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Now I finally understand how our lMaroochy Cpouncil is really run when the Mayor says he wasn't aware that such an activity was planned and authorised, nor was he aware how much money was being spent in one big lump from the dubiously named "Staff Training fund".

We should all rethink our anger at our poor Mayors performance and redirect it at the real power in Council, the "Acting" CEO.

Wow - we could all have saved ourselves the cost of electing and paying Councillors to represent us when we have a powerhouse manager ready to make the decisions.

By the way, does the new Council put the job of CEO out for public consideration or will that be just another rubber stamp by relatively powerless Councillors. Come on our 2 contenders - let's hear your thoughts, if any, on this!
on 24 February, 2008 at 11:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I was delighted to see bob abbott walking the esplanade on Saturday morning in mooloolaba. The only time I have seen Joe up there is when a tv camera is not far behind or in front of him. Won my vote bob.
on 27 February, 2008 at 8:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The proposed party as I understand was proposed after the last Council Meeting. It was nothing to do with the councillors. One would hope that the new councillors when elected will terminate the employment of the organisers. They are not fit to be employed by council, especially spending ratepayers funds

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.