Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
10:21AM Friday 29 August, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Possible shower min 12° - max 22°

Abbot has a win in fight to protect Noosa

Noosa mayor Bob Abbot has secured a small victory in the fight to protect his shire’s iconic status.

Mr Abbot has been able to persuade deputy premier and infrastructure and planning minister Paul Lucas to at least consider minor changes to the process an external assessment panel will use to decide development applications.

But he could not persuade the state government to budge from its controversial decision to appoint a five-member panel to oversee some of the major developments in Noosa.

“We don’t agree with the assessment panel in the first place, but the minister has said it will be,” Mr Abbot said.

“What we have done is convinced him to consider that the panel will only look at those applications that don’t comply with the planning scheme or conflict with the iconic description.

“This will help in that it won’t hold up the development process.”

Mr Abbot was also optimistic he had been able to persuade Mr Lucas to consider allowing the future mayor of the Sunshine Coast regional council to have some input on who sits on the panel.

“He said he would be willing to work with me or whoever was mayor to consider all the members of the panel,” Mr Abbot said.

Mr Lucas told the Daily yesterday the “entire panel could be made up of locals if people with the proper expertise are available”.

His spokesman defined “proper expertise” as “people with expertise in the environment and town planning”.

“The independent assessment panels are about getting the balance right,” Mr Lucas said.

“They will include local representatives as well as environmental and planning experts. The Noosa panel, for example, will include at least two locals ... indeed the entire panel could be made up of locals if people with the proper expertise are available.

“As part of appointing a panel, I will ask council and other organisations such as the Planning Institute to make suggestions about individual members. We will ensure there is appropriate local representation and that there is top-quality representation – regardless of where people might live.”

Representatives from the Friends of Noosa also met with senior staff from the offices of Mr Lucas and premier Anna Bligh yesterday to discuss concerns about iconic legislation, including the composition of the panel and how it would function.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 23 February, 2008 at 12:47 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I still have a problem with this. Bob's experience is with a Council who play by the rules.

Ours isn't.

I think there is value in having an independent panel to assess proposals against the laws. That's what worked for Montville.

These concessions also leave it to the council staff to voluntarily send proposals to the panel.

If the staff are 'bullied' where does that leave us?

Back where we started.

If it is all going to rely on the Council doing the right thing it doesn't add any improvement to the situation we have now, does it?

Anyway it is only for three years IF the councils do the right thing and develop our new planning schemes with full and fair community consultation and acceptance.
on 23 February, 2008 at 1:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Has this been incorrectly reported? My reading of this legislation has always said that the State appointed panel would ONLY come into play when an application did not comply with the planning scheme...or was contrary to the Iconic description. So there is no change here.
I do respect Bob Abbott's concern regarding amalgamation. Maroochy and Caloundra Councils are well known to have approved some horrendous developments. The Town Plan for Caloundra is so bad concerning Maleny that they have chosen to NOT seek Iconic listing. The Maroochy Town Plan for the Blackall Range is however fine and that is why so many Hinterlands are supporting Iconic status for the Maroochy area of the Blackall Range.
Rather than bash up the State Government however I would rather see the contesting mayors name the sitting Councilors they know have been the ones that have attempted to overturn Town Plans; ignore the opinions of the community and readily fall in line with developers or 'business interests'.
No matter how hard the State may try to 'avoid contamination and manipulation' by local 'interests' the success of the new Supercouncil will depend on the calibre of the new Councilors.
Both Maroochy and Caloundra have had a MAJORITY of 'develop at any cost' mentality in Council. This does not mean that all sitting Councilors are either ineffective or dishonest.
It means that without the 'numbers' no amount of good will or integrity will give us a Council with a majority committed to good governance.

PLEASE Joe and Bob...tell us who NOT to vote for so the new Council can be a good one...one I believe the people of the Sunshine Council deserve.
on 23 February, 2008 at 8:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Tulipgirl, you are right - the Coast desparately needs a good collection of councillors to take it into the next decade, before all hope of preventing it going the way of the Gold Coast is lost.

Here's my thoughts on the candidates on offer:

Div 1 - Anna Grosskreutz (strong local representative)
Div 2 - not sure
Div 3 - Kerryn Jones (and definitely NOT Chris Cummins - see my prior explanation <a href="http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2008/feb/14/chris-cummins-considers-mayoral-run/">here</a>
Div 4 - Andrew Champion (you may not always agree with him, but there can never be any doubting his ethics)
Div 5 - Jenny McKay
Div 6 - Christian Dickson (and give Hullet a Simpsons-style boot up the bum)
Div 7 - Ken O'Flaherty
Div 8 - Jeff Watson (Hulett's puppet Northey should also get the "boot"
Div 9 - Vivien Griffin (she's a man-hating pain in the butt, but there is never any doubting of Vivien's environmental and social ethics)
Div 10 - Paul Tatton (the guy lives and breathes Nambour and with a decent Council could achieve much more)
Div 11 - Russell Green (by name and by nature)
Div 12 - Lew Brennan

Mayor - the reality is that the Coast is spoilt - both Joe and Bob would be good Mayors.
on 24 February, 2008 at 2:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Whatever, the panel for the reviewing applications needs to be professionals. If we had pro development councilors or pro development government ministers and they had the majority on the 'panel', we are potentially in the stew again not protecting what we want protected.

Another thing is - Iconic places requires a submission of the reasons the place is iconic and then THAT IS what will be protected. Surely that could include Maleny in the Blackall Range.

Now to councillors. What did I say about pro development. Thanks for the snapshot Coalface. Thats something to start with.
on 24 February, 2008 at 8:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
My understanding, my_word is that what will be protected is the existing planning scheme.

Montville's is the Blackall Range Planning code that in the end did not allow Links.

Maleny's planning scheme allowed Woolworths.

That sort of thing is not something most people want protected, so that is why the petition is asking the government to protect Montville and not Maleny.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.