Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
2:21PM Wednesday 03 December, 2008

End of the road

End of the road

24/02/08 172997d Rosemary Stephen uses the cycleway over Maroochy River Bridge. Photo: Kari Bourne/KB172997d

THE impressive new bridge spanning the Maroochy River offers cyclists the smoothest possible path from one side to the other – the equivalent of a 4m-wide cycling freeway.

But the moment they hit the North Shore, the ride isn’t quite as smooth.

The direct pathway comes to an abrupt halt and riders have a choice of either taking a lengthy detour or breaking the law and dicing with traffic on the motorway.

It’s a situation which has left cycling enthusiasts angry and regional council aspirants keen to be seen as offering a solution.

John Stephen of Suncoast Cycling Alliance describes it as a “bloody disgrace”.

“Maroochy River Bridge to Pacific Paradise is one of the most important links on the Sunshine Coast,” he said.

“The cycleway is absolutely brilliant...it’s like a dream but what comes after it is a nightmare.

“You can imagine what it’s like trying to cycle north from Maroochydore to Pacific Paradise or one of the many suburbs up that way.

“This is a key link and at the moment it’s hell.”

At the moment, riders travelling north come off the bridge to find they must follow a route which doubles back under the bridge, on to Godfrey’s Road West out almost as far as Bli Bli and finally back through the busy and dangerous roundabout which takes motorway traffic to the airport.

Late last year Mr Stephen represented cyclists in talks with Maroochy mayor Joe Natoli to make Maroochy shire more cycle friendly, based on the award-winning model in Noosa.

“Maroochy council has fallen way behind on road safety,” he said at the time, and Mr Natoli agreed to endorse proposals including cycle signs and symbols on the road, Noosa-style “green zones” and raising driver awareness.

His council has come under attack for failing to request money from the state government for bikeways and last week he confirmed he would continue pushing for improvements to the Coast’s cycling network.

Mr Stephen said Maroochy council had improved its attitude towards cyclists but the same could not be said for the Department of Main Roads.

“This whole thing is a state roads problem – Maroochy council is not the bad guy in this. We’ve given them a fair serve in recent months but most of the key cycling link routes – from Mooloolaba to the Maroochy River Bridge, Bradman Avenue, Nicklin Way – are all Main Roads, and Main Roads is continuing to do nothing,” he said.

Mr Natoli confirmed Main Roads had no plans to include the cycleway in the new bridge and only did so because of lobbying by himself and council’s town planning chair, Tony Northey.

He admitted his council had “not done as well as other local governments” when it came to planning for this kind of infrastructure and hoped to address this as part of an overall transport strategy if elected mayor.

He has also promised he would commit funding towards bicycle pathways and said Maroochy councillors had already made a commitment to spend “millions” on this in the next budget.

He couldn’t say where the money would be spent or whether it would attract a dollar-for-dollar match from the state government.

Noosa mayor Bob Abbot, the only other contender for the mayoral position, said fixing the Coast’s ad-hoc cycling networks and reducing dependence on cars by at least 10% in the next decade was one of his election commitments.

“It is going to be one of the big spends for the regional council,” Mr Abbot said, although he didn’t think the Sunshine Coast would need to spend as much as the $100 million Brisbane’s mayor Campbell Newman has promised for cycleways if elected. Mr Abbot said he believed it was important for the Coast to address the bizarre cycling infrastructure that was in place in some areas – including the Sunshine Coast motorway north of the Maroochy River Bridge.

“It doesn’t make sense to have a bikeway on the bridge but not off it, this will be dealt with immediately and funding will be found,” he said.

Many of the problems with bicycle pathways was that there was not a “long-term transport strategy”.

“We’ve had one in Noosa but there hasn’t been one available for the rest of the Sunshine Coast. A strategy has to come before the structure as we can’t have a knee-jerk reaction where things are built that become useless later.”

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 25 February, 2008 at 4:48 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Egads!
It's those awful cyclists again!
Quick wake up Jamie Dunn, they have to be stopped. Let their tyres down or throw sand on their chains or something!
on 25 February, 2008 at 7:35 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
This bridge is a disgrace. It should be earmarked the most "environmentally unfriendly bridge in Australia!"

In other words, let's build a wonderful looking, new bridge which will cater for the increased amount of cars travelling over it; and we'll give all the cyclists a path (shared mind you) which they can cross on; never mind about the goat track on the other side or the potentially second worst roundabout to negotiate on the Sunshine Coast! Go figure!!

Personally, I wont travel on it. I still run the gauntlet on the bridge. I refuse to ride on that pothole ridden excuse for a road called Godfreys!

And as for Joe committing millions if re-elected on bike paths??

Wake up mate! We don't want shared bike paths WITH pedestrians! It doesn't cost millions!

Just spend the money upgrading some of the EXISTING roads and you'll find yourself and the taxpayer saving bucket loads!
on 25 February, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Once again Main Roads show they have no idea about serious cyclists needs. A little planning to allow reasonable separation between cars and bikes would not only save lives and injuries but avoid frustration between the drivers and the cyclists. In this case their cynicism is outstanding - a beautiful bikepath to nowhere!
on 25 February, 2008 at 9:12 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It is great for a politician to stand up and make another hollow statement like "We are green" or "we are committed to getting cars off the road".
But then of course, their claims are shown to be false, incorrect or just misleading.

I live in Alexandra Headland have ride a bike. These roads are some of the most dangerous in the world to ride on. Professional cyclists think the same. Tight and narrow streets of Italy fair better than what we have here.

The main issue is bicycle awareness. There is a big lack of it. Bob Abbott's Green Zones are only about Bicycle Awareness. And that is what we need. Letting motorists know that cyclists use this road as well as them. When motorists understand that we have every right to use the road, then the cycling safety and awareness message will be won.

The best way to bicycle safety is to educate motorists about sharing the roads with cyclists. And how much carbon dioxide are we emitting? The only hot air is when we get abused by yet another motorist for slowing their trip down by 5seconds.

FA1...out.
on 25 February, 2008 at 9:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Yes, that's right Roadrunner. Readers should refer to the latest Dunn's Diaries for all the inside goss on the Coast's oppressed cyclists.
on 25 February, 2008 at 2:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Here's a quote from Peter Wellington in Cycling Fury Hots Up (18th Jan 2008). Mr Wellington said he was “stunned” that Maroochy Council hadn’t applied for funding.

Mr Wellington. Did your engineers forget they have a cycling policy when they built the bridge to nowhere? I quote from the Main Roads Policy Document, Cycling on State Controlled Roads: Cycle friendly - Road designs that make it easier and safer for cyclists etc. Positively Provide - Marked cycle lanes, cycle paths, shared paths etc. Priority cycling route - A planned cycling route etc.

Maybe people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones! What have you got to say now Mr Wellington? Or should we expect the long silence we are used to. You are very good at dishing it out to Maroochy council, but what about your government? Can we continue to expect state roads to be dangerous to cyclists with no attempt at retrofitting safety concerns? I guess the usual silence will confirm what we already know!
on 25 February, 2008 at 3:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I just drove (and yes, I do DRIVE a van for work) over the bridge about an hour ago.

I was amazed to see what happens at the southern end. Yes, not the northern end in which the article targets, but the southern end.

After coming off the bridge, and negotiating the stone-ridden path which winds its way around past the back of the Maroochy Waters Hotel, the path abruptly ends?
Its then one requires some sort of off-road bike to ride across the patch of dirt and prepare to jump the kerb onto the road!

This would have to be the biggest ballsed-up, cock-up of a project ever conceived!
on 25 February, 2008 at 5:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
A Taj Mahal for motorists; a White Elephant for cyclists. BRAVO!

This is a beautiful target for the cyclists who have put road safety (and a few notable local politicians) in the spotlight.

Go for it, boys! Let's get some REAL change happening!
on 25 February, 2008 at 5:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Besty, I think we might give them the benefit of the doubt here, the path at the southern end isn't finished yet. Looks like the final layer of hot mix still to go on.
I do agree with you about finishing nowhere, but apparently the pathway continues South to Maroochydore Rd.
Now there is a nonsense, South to Maroochydore Rd from where? A pretty unimportant link compared to the North one if you ask me!
on 25 February, 2008 at 9:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The bridge is fantastic, so much for the connections on either side. I rode across it to the airport and back a couple of times. The same goes for Maroochy Boulevard. The path just ends - I prefer the bus lanes on that road. Still, around Maroochydore, a pushy is an easy way to do your shopping with all that traffic going nowhere at times. But I do prefer the roads as they are more direct.

They are carving out the path to Maroochydore Road. Hopefully the duplication to Nambour Connection Road has shoulders wide enough to be able to ride to Woombye, as this is currently a nice 15km cruise on shoulders about 30cm wide!

The coast needs a powerful cycling lobby group, like the CBD BUG in Brisbane, whom the council actually listens to. I haven't tried the Sunshine Motorway on anything other than a motorbike so far. Maybe one day on the pushy if the cycle track isn't complete in another few years.
on 26 February, 2008 at 10:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hey listen you bunch of whingers! You are asking a dysfunctional council to make sensible, well-planned and mature decisions about future infrastructure development. Which planet are you living on? 'A warming one', you may answer. Ah yes, but MSC doesn't recognise, or should I say want to recognise any inevitablities bar their own narrow and near-future interests.

Following the latest poll which shows that Natoli is about as much appreciated by voters as a f*rt in a lift, this reflects the people's verdict on his mayoral role.

Hopefully, the other dinosaurs on MSC will disappear at the same and we can develop sane sustainable infrastructure that refelects the wishes of the WHOLE community.

PS Anyone noticed the appalling increase in potholes over the last six weeks? Try riding a bike over that lot!
on 26 February, 2008 at 2:16 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Cycling blogs always garner strong, often diametrically opposed opinions, from some motorists who seem to loathe all cyclists for daring to want to share the roads, to some cyclists who argue they have as equal right as any vehicle. However, the underlying cause of the conflict between motorists and cyclists is not so much that each loathes the other; but that our road system is not designed with cyclists in mind. Because nothing separates cyclists from vehicles, the smaller, more vulnerable cycles have to share the same road space with motorists.

Further, when well meaning politicians (who are obviously not cyclists) spend money on cycling infrastructure, they do not take into account the needs of the different types of cyclists; but then the non cyclists cannot understand why the cyclists keep complaining. But, whilst I am perfectly happy on my mountain bike to tootle along the potholed, flooded concrete path from Sippy Downs to Kawana; an expensive road bike would suffer major damage. Also, road cyclists train at high speeds, often the same speed as cars; and it is extremely dangerous to cycle at those speeds on a pathway that is also used by pedestrians.

But many of these issues have simple and relatively inexpensive solutions; way cheaper than building new bike paths: these include: bicycle awareness zones, putting bike racks on to busses, providing secure bike racks, showers at workplaces, and educating people on the health and environmental benefits of cycling.

However, as much as Governments may TALK about sustainable transport, cutting greenhouse gas emissions and curbing the obesity epidemic; without the political will, nothing will change; there will just be more cars and less room for alternative forms of transport. And too, whilst cycling on the coast is (justifiably) considered so dangerous, people will continue to drive, and pollute.

Therefore, I urge everyone to vote for Councillors in the upcoming election who are proactive for sustainable forms of transport; some are openly supporting safe cycling and sustainable transport; why not ask YOUR potential Councillor what s/he is going to do if elected.
on 26 February, 2008 at 2:45 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The road to nowhere at the end of the new bridge now ranks with the pathetic and hazardous cycle track under Nicklin Way where it joins the Motorway at the Mooloolah River.
I thought Main Roads had instruction from the State Government to account for cyclists needs when designing roads. Hope they are not paid for performance!
on 26 February, 2008 at 4:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well said Heather, well said!!
on 26 February, 2008 at 5:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
It would be wonderful if Main Roads performed at all in accounting for cyclist's needs.
Back in 2004 Department of Main Roads released its Cycling on State Controlled Roads policy, with these objectives:
1 Make cycling safer and more convenient in Queensland
2 Facilitate a growth in cycling trips
3 Improve cycling connectivity between communities
4 Move investment in cycling towards priority cycling routes
Well as far as I can tell, none of these objectives have been met, let alone considered it appears, on the Sunshine Coast. Yet untold millions continue to be spent upgrading the road network for the exclusive use of motorists.
Why isn't Main Roads implementing its own policy when, in the face of Climate Change and Peak Oil, it's becoming increasingly urgent to make a healthy, socially equitable emission free form of transport such as cycling a realistic alternative to motoring?
on 26 February, 2008 at 6:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Gee whiz Greentourer, I wonder if Peter Wellington would "stunned" to know that?
on 26 February, 2008 at 6:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
We live in one of the most beautiful areas in the world - visitors and local daily commuters are ignored when it comes to travelling by bike in some areas. It is a nightmare to ride from Nicklin way via Alexandra Headland, Cotton Tree etc to then negotiate the roundabout after the already commented on Maroochy bridge exit. It would seem Noosa is setting a fine example with Caloundra following come on Maroochdore I am sure you would like to see more cars off the road i.e. Bums on Bikes who are safe!
on 26 February, 2008 at 6:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
heather_s... Quite right, my expensive road bike has suffered horrifically from the state of the Sippy Downs to Kawana/Mtn Creek bike path. With 20 years competition behind me my skills allow me to not need the path but my 9 and 13 year olds have recently taken up the sport and their current skills and road sense dictate the use of paths.

This would not be the case if there was decent infrastructure in place. And I'm sure that the constant harassment of cyclists by drivers would also abate if the drivers didn't have to spend most of their time dodging bikes that are so poorly catered for.

Main Roads and Council alike need to realise that a little extra spending initially reaps huge ongoing savings because every commuter bike on the road is one less car polluting the atmosphere, clogging intersections and pounding new potholes in the road.

The 2 lane Bruce Highway (only 20 years ago from Caboolture north was 1 lane each way) has grown to 4 lanes. Now the 6 lanes creeping north are nearly at Caboolture and there's big sections of 8 lanes closer to Brisbane. If main roads are genuine in their objectives listed above by Greentourer they will stop adding lanes for cars and start adding lanes for bikes. Or even better, take existing lanes off cars and give them to bikes.

Maybe that's impractical for main highways, but imagine how safe and convenient it would be to commute around the Sunshine Coast if one entire lane of the Nicklin Way, Sunshine Motorway, David Low Way, Old Bruce Hwy and half a dozen east-west roads to the highway were closed to motorised traffic and properly marked and managed for cyclists.
on 26 February, 2008 at 7:17 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Perhaps we could have a Counsellor on a Bike day . If we all invited the candidates to come for a cycle with us through the region they might get the message !
What about it ?
Why not write to your candidates today !
on 26 February, 2008 at 7:33 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Beyond the commuters, there's nothing here for the recreational cyclists either. Brisbane has half a dozen parks dedicated to cyclists with circuits for recreational use which also host some very vigorous racing most weekends which is a great introduction to a healthy pasttime for families to watch.

Another cycling disgrace is Queenslands lack of an indoor velodrome. Our cutting edge facility is an outdoor concrete track on the south side of Brisbane built in 1980 for the 1982 Commonwealth Games. There are 9 indoor wooden tracks in Australia but Queenslanders who have to compete at a national level have no equivalent facility to train and race on putting them at a distinct disadvantage against the rest of the country in a sport which is Australia's best performing (Games medals) outside the pool.
on 26 February, 2008 at 9:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Just watched Insight. Climate change and peak oil are becoming REALLY serious and urgent issues. The changes we are going to see in the next 10 years will blow your socks off, new industries created, 6 star enviro friendly buildings, environmental enclaves, Mad Max suburbs (no don’t ask), financial incentives, public transport, cars left at home AND. You guessed it cycle amenities, all highlighted as extra urgent.
In the meantime what is our State Government doing about these cycleways? You guessed it, ZIP, ZILCH, NIL. Actually it is not so much our state government, but our esteemed North Coast Hinterland Office which has done, is doing N-O-TH-I-N-G. The same office that told our guys two years ago that they were not interested in cyclists, in fact would rather see cyclists banned from state roads!
They have this policy document called Main Roads Policy – Cycling On State Controlled Roads yet they continue to ignore the content. Take a look along Niklin Way and what do you see, a barrier closing off the shoulder so that cyclists have to cycle in the 60 km/h vehicle lane, no Watch for Cyclists sign, no lolly pop man, nothing, run the gauntlet guys. The works description touts this extra lane as being a great saving for motorists, but nothing about cyclists or a cycle lane at all! I will bet anyone that they have no plans for one either. Further north the shoulder disappears completely outside Harvey Norman, great fun when a Sunbus passes you at 70 km/h within 400 mm. On the Mooloola River Bridge the shoulder is way under regulation width while the speed limit is raised to 80km.h. Just this week new line painting on King St in Buderim, did they put in a cycle lane (as per their stated policy) while they were doing it? Of course not. The Currimundi Bridge, the ONLY access North, speed limit 70 km/h, shoulder? Not even a metre wide. The cost to paint cycle lanes on the huge shoulder width all along Niklin Way? A pittance compared to what they spend to move cars. These guys continue to seriously disassociate themselves with cycling.
This is the same state government that continues to subsidise petrol giving motorists an even greater incentive to use their cars instead of alternative transport. Did you know that our Premier is a cyclist? Wouldn’t think so would you!
How long before our state politicians pull their heads out of the sand?
on 27 February, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
By the way - the aforementioned policy document was dated 10th AUGUST 2004. Over THREE years ago and still they do NOTHING!
http://www.mainroads.qld.gov.au/web/Atta...
on 27 February, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
A great idea Badger, have a Councilor on a bike day, maybe then they will begin to realize how dangerous our roads are to cyclists.
on 27 February, 2008 at 10:06 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Not quite on the cycle subject but we feel ALL streets in urban areas especially Buderim should have a 50 Km per hour limit. This is common in more enlightened southern states. Signs at the town entrance proclaim the speed limit for ALL streets in that town.
on 27 February, 2008 at 11:01 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
You poor skinny wheelers- you have to go pothole dodging thru Godfreys Rd and then that horrid roundabout at Pac Paradise. I hate that route so much I cut thru the (currently) boggy cane fields to the east of the motorway to get to Twin waters/Mudjimba. Risking prosecution by land owners (hopefully he hasn't got a shotgun) and brown snakes !! Safer that that roundabout I reckon....
on 27 February, 2008 at 12:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You mountain bikers are so smug with your all terrain tyres and everything. I've a good mind to tell Jamie Dunn to start picking on you for tearing up valuable flood plain land. Skinny wheelers indeed!
We could end up with another Bike War, Skinnies versus Knobblies. Led lights at fifty metres!
on 27 February, 2008 at 6:40 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Both ends of the bridge are up to the usual standard, the probems as I noted in an earlier comment:

"As for all NEW bikeways in Maroochy will be at least 3 metres, that may be so but our shining new Maroochy River bridge cycle access on the north still has us doing the scenic route complete with numerous double backs and a path that floods, on the south the path splits, one being a loose bitumen coated gravel that ended on a grass footpath and gutter jump to the road, the other has a fast downhill path leading to T with a 1m footpath, not to mention the potentially slippery metal access covers that span the entire intersection. Can anyone else see a common Maroochy thread?"

Our problem is that the ones who plan and design havn't got a clue!
on 4 March, 2008 at 12:24 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"You mountain bikers are so smug with your all terrain tyres and everything. I've a good mind to tell Jamie Dunn to start picking on you for tearing up valuable flood plain land. Skinny wheelers indeed!
We could end up with another Bike War, Skinnies versus Knobblies."

Frankly, I'm glad to now be one of the knobblies.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.