Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
4:53AM Monday 08 September, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly cloudy min 11° - max 23°

21,400 new homes needed on the Coast

About 21,400 new homes will be needed on the Sunshine Coast in the next five years and at the current rate of construction, supply will fall short of demand.

That’s the view of the Housing Industry Association which says the findings of its latest research paint a grim picture for future affordability.

The HIA said it expected about 3550 homes to be built on the Coast this year - roughly 600 fewer than were needed.

HIA’s chief executive of policy, Chris Lamont said conditions in Queensland’s South East corner were shaping up to create ‘the perfect storm’, with continued rapid growth, pent up demand for housing and a lack of trade labour to meet it.

“There will be further price pressures in that sector and that’s bad news for affordability,” Mr Lamont said.

“The migration numbers are actually alarming and they are not being matched by residential construction.

“We are asking the government to look at targeted migration and actively recruiting tradespeople.

“It’s a short-term solution but a necessary one because at the moment we are just not going to get there.”

Mr Lamont said it was a similar story in growth hotspots around the nation, where a total of a million new homes would be needed in the next five years.

He said the government must tackle the problem of labour shortages to ensure growing competition for housing did not continue to force prices up and begin to impact on community attitudes towards new arrivals.

Mr Lamont said the state government’s recently announced plans to fast track land releases on 17 greenfield sites in the South East corner, including four on the Sunshine Coast, would not address the shortfall in production.

A recent survey commissioned by the Local Government Association has found the government’s announcement also failed to impress residents in the region.

Premier Anna Bligh said the release of land for new estates would help ease the affordability crisis but most of the 400 households questioned in the survey were sceptical.

Only 23.2% of people thought the shortage of land for new housing estates was a “very significant” factor in housing affordability, while 45.3% nominated interest rates as the key factor.

Respondents also took a dim view of developers with 89% saying a reduction in government charges for developers would only increase their profits.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 1 July, 2008 at 8:07 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Why do these people always insist on looking at supply and never dealing with demand? If we (the whole planet, that is) don’t control demand (growth) soon we’ll destroy ourselves. None of the big problems that humanity faces can truly be solved without controlling growth.

Don’t forget the adage of the eminent economist and former president of the American Economics Association, Kenneth E. Boulding:
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." and, as I’ve added before, ‘or a developer’.

We need to deal with this!
on 1 July, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Spot on mate. Supply over demand.......Always quick with the band aids solution without looking at why the underlying problem is there in the first place. BUILD as many as you want. If people cannot afford to live in them then whats the bloody point? Do something about rental prices, do something about the low incomes do something about the Cost of Living there.......then build ya houses. Oh and take a gander at the basic infrastructure and see if the water and sewage and local gov. can handle all these new joints.
on 1 July, 2008 at 9:04 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
People were right to be sceptical about the processing time of development applications being a significant cause of the housing lag. It is now clear that the Premier shared that scepticism when she decided to call the developers' bluff by offering to fast track some.

Now their solution is for the Sunshine Coast to enhance its appeal to new arrivals over other "growth hot spots" by head-hunting tradespeople.
The HIA is part of the housing affordability problem, not the solution, as 89% of respondents to the LGA survey attest.
on 1 July, 2008 at 9:25 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
21,500 new homes on the Coast is fine and dandy. But who is going to be in a position to afford to live in these homes?
It was only a day or so ago, I was reading that families are thinking of leaving the Coast area because they cannot meet the expense of living here.
on 1 July, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Not enough houses? It doesnt make good sense to keep increasing the population when there are not enough resources to cater for the needs of the current population let alone the future population. There are too many cars on the road, or the roads are not big enough to carry them.

There is not enough car parking, but that is fixing itself because most people can't afford petrol. You can't get a bus to catch the early morning train from Landsborough to Brisbane. The governments stupidity in resuming the Mary Valley for water, instead of harvesting rain water, or reducing the number of people coming into Australia is economic madness. All costs will continue to spiral with wages and interest rates going up, and the costs being added to petrol, transport, and basic necessities. Let the government train apprentices to build government housing to house our own homeless people.
on 1 July, 2008 at 10:34 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It came to light a couple of weeks ago as more beautiful 100 year old trees were demolished in Buderim that there are now not permits required to remove trees on your own property through council.

They stated that as most trees could be proven to be a threat to property & safety council had to always grant permission except for in about 1% of cases. The council apparently decided that the money would be better spent on protecting vegitation and scrub lands around the Sunshine Coast instead. Can we have that in writing as the sea of houses & buisness's continues to grow and the land keeps on getting cleared.

Does anyone remember why the earth needs trees. 100 years to grow and 30 mins for a experienced tree lopper to fell.

Go build on farm lands that are already cleared for crops and no longer in use. Next time you are travelling make an effort to look out the window on your flight, there is not much undeveloped land left. Leave the trees alone.
on 1 July, 2008 at 11:33 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Sure go ahead an build all the new housing you like but build it in high density inner 'city' areas ONLY. No more urban sprawl, enough is enough. The advantages of living in a built up area are enormous, no traffic, public transport readily available, minimal added infastructure required, a lot cheaper and I also believe much safer. It's time to re-establish communities again and discourage neighbourhoods where people don't even know the person next door.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.