12:00a.m. 15th July 2008
Farleigh Farm riding group members are concerned about a high-voltage Energex line that will cross the paddocks where they agist their horses. Photo: Barry Leddicoat/177031a
Energex has told a Maroochydore Road property owner that it will call in the police and seek a Supreme Court injunction if he stops its surveyors entering his property today.
Don Hungerford, who has farmed the land for the past 40 years, blocked entrance to the surveyors on June 26 when Energex last attempted to survey the proposed route for its Sun Power project.
It is the latest of a series of resumptions and easement claims enforced on as many as 1000 Sunshine Coast property owners for projects including the Traveston Crossing dam, Powerlink and Energex cables, road works and the Landsborough to Nambour rail realignment.
Mr Hungerford said a letter he received from Energex on July 8 citing the Acquisition of Lands regulations made it clear he had no rights.
He is angry that Energex has ignored an available sewerage main easement and a more direct route for the transmission line, and fearful of the affect emissions will have on the health of his workers, children living in adjacent houses and horses stabled on his property.
Peter Boyce, of Butler McDermott lawyers in Nambour, said Energex had refused to properly consider an alternative corridor for the transmission line.
Mr Hungerford said he had received no response addressing the issues raised in letters he had sent objecting to the route.
The July 8 notice from Energex that it would exercise its rights today under the Act and warned that it was an offence to prevent access by its officers.
“Should you wilfully obstruct or attempt to wilfully obstruct Energex’s entry onto the properties on 15 July 2008 or any re-entry of the properties by Energex, Energex will have no option but to consider our legal remedies including but not limited to referring the matter to the police as well as seeking an order/injunction from the Supreme Court.’’
Mr Hungerford is angry that there is a body of scientific evidence about the dangers to health from high-voltage power lines that is being ignored.
If he fails in his attempts to get Energex to re-think its route options, he will take the matter to the planning court, where he will attempt to enforce the Integrated Planning Act provisions requiring that a “precautionary and prudent approach” be taken to the placement of the transmission lines.
Professor Denis Henshaw, who is a member of the British Government Stakeholder Advisory Group for EMF, has written to Mr Hungerford’s lawyers, saying power companies and governments are in denial about the proven health effects of magnetic fields associated with electricity supply.
His research has found that “power requency magnetic fields suppress the production in the pineal gland of the important hormone and natural anti-cancer agent melatonin and this may explain the adverse health effects associated with magnetic field exposures’’.
Professor Henshaw’s UK research found that high-voltage powerlines emitted corona ions, which he says may help explain an apparent increased risk of childhood leukaemia up to 600 metres away.
Mr Hungerford said the Integrated Planning Act’s requirement that opportunity for community involvement be provided had not been met, with Energex unwilling to listen to any contrary view.
The proposed transmission line route takes a deviation from a straight line over Mr Hungerford’s property and goes close to homes housing small children, who research shows are the most likely to suffer negative consequences.
Jane Blue, whose daughters have horses agisted on the property on the corner of Parsons and Maroochydore Roads, is one of many parents who have written to Mines and Energy Minister Geoff Wilson arguing that there is a better route for the transmission line.
She said the decision not to follow a route in a straight line along a 40-metre buffer was putting at risk the health of children and horses.
An Energex spokesperson said it had tried to negotiate with Mr Hungerford to gain access for survey work.
“Mr Hungerford has declined our approaches but the urgency of the project now requires that we finalise the route to ensure that the project is completed in time to meet the projected new level of electricity demand in the mid-Sunshine Coast region,” the spokesperson said.
“In identifying the corridor for the proposed powerline, Energex has considered many competing planning, ecological, social and economic factors.
“The corridor has been aligned (where possible) against existing boundaries and where possible to avoid vegetated areas, plus other matters.
“To this extent the cleared section of land on Mr Hungerford’s property provided a clear route and minimised the need to remove screening vegetation.
“In relation to the EMF claims, Energex builds all of its infrastructure well within minimum national EMF standards that have been set following extensive international and national research.”
The spokesperson said Energex would not be constructing powerlines over the horse stables.
“Where horse pads are traversed by the proposed powerline, Energex would like to discuss the specifics with Mr Hungerford and potentially move any minor structures that may contravene the safe operation of the powerline.”
Recent Comments
Stand firm Hungerford!
We live under the Westminster political system in Australia. Queensland ( belieive it or not) is part of Australia. Under that system which is based on the Magna Carta of 1215 ( or whenever it was king John signed it) provides that a "Mans home" is his castle .. and as such cannot be taken away.. which in effect is what they are trying to do here.
Mongrels, all of them... Time for a revolution!
I know they check for such 'vips' when performing the planning process.
Newsblog, Viva la Revolution
Maroochydore Road used to be a pleasant drive under a shady canopy of dense forest, but over the past couple of decades strip development and road widening have seen the forest reduced to a thin buffer that remains in just a few places.
And now Energex is cast as the villain for preserving what's left of the place's ravaged scenic amenity. If the original developers of the Kunda Park industrial area had left a buffer of that brooding dark forest along its frontage on Maroochydore Road people in the hinterland might be less wary than we are about industrial development here.
Just as those people at Belli Park and Ridgewood have a rigth to say to Powerlink, "bugger off with your power line to nowhere, we dont want it, we wont have it .. that too should be the end of the argument.
its their land they have a right Not to have it spoiled.
Ok in Queensland they dont have that right, I forgot.
As we need to transition AWAY from fossil fuels and move into a new era of small and local solutions the bullyinging from large institutions on the small person, family and community can no longer be tolerated. This action shows the real loss of democracy in QLD while we weren't watching. This is a clear invasion to support outdated technologies and all this for whom? In the period of no growth and negative growth we will all mourn the loss of opportunity to create sustainable systems when we still had the opportunity.
Join your local Transition Town action group and let us all work for long term solutions that Powerlink can be an important part of....with proper thinking and planning.
Powerlink we need you to work with and for us not against us. The technologies are known. Let's see some creative solutions from younger and better informed planners and please retire your dinosaurs before they ruin our chances for a dignified future.
Powerlink is constructing underground lines for 2km in Carseldine\Brisbane, but refuses any underground lines in these Sunshine Coast areas. Public utilities belong on public land with the public bearing the presence, rather than unfairly burdening rural residents with their presence and major land value and use losses, especially as they are not the ultimate energy users. Energex and Powerlink compensation offers typically approximate only 10-25% of the actual land market value loss, as its paid spokesmen know when claiming rural residents "will be compensated". All bow to the great State of Brisbane which the neighbouring State of Queensland merely serves!
I find it difficult to comprehend that this is the same Queensland company we are speaking about?
Energex and Powerlink seem to have a few things in common which I will list here.
1. They are both Queensland companies.
2. They both use tax payers money to deliver propaganda to the general public.
3. Energex and Powerlink don't even have the decency to respond to 'affected households' concerns.
4. Powerlink and now Energex both make legal threats, treating us like criminals instead of respectable concerned citizens.
5. Powerlink and Energex employees don't seem to be able to intellectually design alternative routes that are not detrimental to our physical, emotional and mental well being or the environment.
6. It would seem apparent by their behavior, that Powerlink and Energex employees are being offered 'extra bonuses' to be insensitive to our distressed concerns.
7. Powerlink and Energex fail to consider alternatives.
8. They both seem to think they have the right to 'bull doze' through the lives of innocent people. I can think of a few countries in the world where similar behavior is apparent. May I suggest that we contact Amnesty International and report this human rights abuse from transmission line companies that are owned by the State Government of Queensland. Shame shame!!!!
It seems that Energex is saving lives in one department and destroying lives in another.
Both Energex and Powerlink 'try' the community and seek the weakest and most vulnerable route to route the infrastructure at the cost of families and in particular the children as we find in Don's case.
Stand firm Don and fight these heartless '"whatsits" !
www.saveeumundi.org
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again