12:00a.m. 19th July 2008
Derelict caravans at the Woombye Gardens Caravan Park reveal the harsh reality of Queensland’s affordable housing crisis.
The harsh reality of Queensland’s affordable housing crisis is the tarpaulins covering the bunch of leaky, cockroach-chewed, derelict caravans with just a microwave to cook on and plywood covering the holes in the floor at Woombye Gardens Caravan Park.
Forget the so-called Bligh Queensland Housing Affordability Strategy – which at best may, at some stage in the future, deliver $450,000 homes in greenfield sites across the Sunshine Coast for 75,0000 people.
This is about now, and the best the state government can do to help those who want jobs but can’t find them, who want a chance but can’t catch the lucky break that will end their dependence on the welfare system.
It’s about a state government that trumpets what it’s doing for the poor with the purchase 10 months ago of a rundown van park where it charges people on $270 a week Newstart allowances $120 a week to live in aluminium boxes where the leaks have swollen the chipboard cupboards, making them unusable to store food.
It’s about having to buy expensive, low-nutrition microwavable meals because the only other heating element lacks the capacity to fry a piece of meat.
It’s about having the pride to scrub and clean a living area in which most would not keep a pet and telling your children and grandkids they can’t visit because of shame and the fear they may fall through the floor.
It’s about when the roof over your head buckles under the weight of water caught by a tarpaulin provided to keep the leaks from dripping on your bed at night.
It’s about having the courage to say this isn’t right after your neighbours have been cowered by the threat that if they don’t like it, there’s always the front gate.
It’s showering in a shared ablutions block, dressing in your best and mustering your nerve to catch the noon bus because you can’t rely on the one at 1pm to arrive on time to take you the seven kilometres into town for a 2.15pm showdown in Nambour Magistrates Court with the Public Trustee and the Department of Housing.
Nicklin independent member of parliament Peter Wellington says the circumstances of people living in the park and other accommodation provided by the Queensland government is appalling.
"I couldn’t have members of my family living like that,’’ he said.
"I’ve inspected that accommodation and believe it is unacceptable. I’m very disappointed we have people residing in this standard of accommodation in a government-managed facility.
"This is a wealthy state. This is simply a disgrace.
“I have raised my concerns in the strongest way possible and am extremely angry and disappointed that action hasn’t been taken.
"This should have been settled the moment it was raised. Now the government is spending money to defend the matter.
“I would have thought we could do better than this."
Residents have been told the accommodation in which they have endured a year of hell is temporary: new mobile homes are on the way.
However, they will cost $170 a week, leaving just $100 to catch buses, look for work and put food on the table.
Meanwhile, one woman will wait until August 7 to again dress in her best and catch the early bus into Nambour for the resumption of the adjourned hearing against the Public Trustee and the Department of Housing into the standard of accommodation in which she is forced to live.
She will do so in the hope that the state will at least do her and the court the courtesy of sending a representative who has read the file, has inspected the accommodation and can justify why she is worth so little.
Recent Comments
This is an unnecessary and shameful situation that is well within our society's means to resolve. Peter Wellington and the Daily are doing a great service in bringing this to our attention.
In regard to low cost housing has the government ever investigated the use of demountable factory produced housing to help with this shortage.Such units were used very successfuly in the U.K.at the end of the second world war to overcome a massive housing shortage caused by six years of no building activity as well as destruction of homes through enemy action.I believe this option would be more cost effective than building so called low cost housing of the traditional sort when on nearly all such contracts there is a strong suspicion that the government is taken to the cleaners by the contractors.
One thought though. Instead of demanding the Government fix everything. How about going and buying a little camp stove with some gas cans? They're quite cheap and work beautifully. We used one for months when our stove clapped out and we had to save for a replacement stove. No government department fixing every little problem for us. You can't blame the caravan, or the Government, for not eating reasonably well. You do have to take some responsibility and action for your own well-being.
10 percent of the houses (maybe more) are empty on any given day on the Sunshine Coast - because the affluent effluent who own them only use them for a few weeks a year.
If the government won't resume those houses and add them to the public housing stock then the government should force the affluent effluent to rent them out so that people (we are talking about people) don;t have to live in the conditions being offered at the moment.
The council has moved in the right direction by slugging the rich with higher rates on second homes, maybe they should encourage the use of these houses by introducing an absentee owner special rate - if you don't live here you pay $500 a week for the pleasure of keeping an empty house. The houses would very soon fill up as the affluent effluent realised there was no real benefit in keeping an empty house for 48 weeks of the year.
Heres a few facts to dwell on when asking for cheap affordable housing and resuming homes that are not used year round,
1) weekly repayments on a loan of $200K = $372, $250K = $465, $300K = $560, $400k = $743, $450K = $835.
2) medium house price $400,000 +
3) renters generally do not want to pay more than say $400pw and less for most average families so lets say $320pw
Therefore a landlord would have to pay $743pw plus for their loan in order to rent it to someone at a 50-60% discount! Does that sound like any sort of investment you would put money into? The answer still lies in a land lease system where first home buyers pay for the house then years later can sell and each party recover their money.
Why should people who have worked hard be continually slugged and punished for reaping rewards of hard slog? And no, I don't own a holiday home anywhere. Why do unemployed low income and homeless people continue to swarm to the coast, or stay on the coast, when it's very clear the rents have gone up to an amount that is unmanagable for them and then complain, and expect others to subsidise their lifestyle choices? There are still many areas that have cheaper rents and will offer people a nicer lifestyle than struggling with high rents on the coast. Are they choosing to live like this just so they can stay on the coast, whereas there are more sensible and practical options for them?
It's not a new concept by any means. For decades people have moved to areas where they could live within their means. This is how the Sunshine Coast started moving in the first place. Many people moved here in the sixties as it was affordable rather than struggling in bigger towns/cities.
Okay.
Just when was Nambour an uninhabited cave JaT?
I know many who have lived there for eons, who are now struggling with rents.
Yeah, Nambour!
Some of these modern day slums known as private van parks (and I concede there are many that are well run and owned by responsible business owners) have been condoned and utilised by many charities and organisations over recent decades, it was only a matter of time before the State Govt jumped on the bandwagon and legalised their usage as accommodation for the genuinely unfortunate, the unwelcome in the neighbourhood and the downright disgusting in our society.
Having lived too close for comfort to the Tanawha Van Village for a decade we have first hand knowledge of how a landlord can reap the cash benefits from the likes of the Salvo's and Red Cross, and the truly genuine decent folk they try to find a roof for. They are forced to live amongst drunks and druggies, and put up with social conditions fraught with danger.
The police, the council, the welfare depts, and yes, even the state govt, did nothing to help our community for the ten years I was involved.
The Tanawha landlord made plenty selling the place not too long ago and it appears to have been cleaned up by the new owner, the locals must have breathed a collective huge sigh of relief.
Now the State Govt is endorsing and maintaining the slum standard at Woombye, good on them, nothing more than I expect of this state government I suppose!
Meanwhile the greatest swindle in Australian history continues as we move to third world living conditions... all in a time of unprecented wealth.
Leaking roofs, sickness, drugs and alcohol ... now for the whitfella intervention ... where are ya now, Mal Brough?
But according to your way of thinking, I should lob up at Elizabeth Bay and then proceed to complain that I can't afford to live there, rents are too high, can't get a job and it's everyone else's fault except mine....especially the folk that have lived there for some time or who have worked long and hard to afford to live there. Rather than be rational and realistic and accept my lot in life and find a place more affordable to live and where there are job opportunities.
Sadly, that way of thinking seems to be becoming more of the Australia trend.
Your article makes reference to the State Government "Affordable Home Stategy" which nobody in private town planning circles seems to know anything about.
All that aside this strategy, your article states, is designed to to deliver us Affordable Homes" at $450,000. well I dont know about you but I dont know too many people today that would deem that to be affordable.
May I suggest that your publication prompt the state government to embrace in its "Affordable Homes Strategy" a committee to investigate why dozens of applications by private operators to produce real affordable homes are being held up at local government level due to said Local councils having to comply with State Government directions regarding town planning issues.
Two such developments in Bundaberg had planned to provide new quality 3b/r homes to go to market at between $195,000 to $250,000 but because of bureaucratic delays this has blown out about 10% already and climbing.One of these applications was lodged over 3 years ago.
This stone walling , time consuming expensive system , together with the ever escalating local councils headworks charges is where the affordable housing problems begin and the sooner the state govenment takes the blinkers off and addresses this situation the sooner we will see affordable homes, real affordable homes.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again