Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
11:12AM Monday 08 September, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly sunny min 11° - max 23°

Tough lessons in Chancellor Park fiasco

An internal legal paper prepared for Sunshine Coast Council is using the disastrous planning outcomes at Chancellor Park as hard lessons for the future.

The lack of a master plan for the estate, which is really an amalgam of seven separate developments, has left the council with infrastructure headaches.

These range from lack of open space playing areas for the suburb’s burgeoning youth population and poor road connectivity, to a failed lake system which will require a vast amount of money to restore.

So naive was the process that the open spaces of Palmview to the south of the suburb were not considered during planning because it was in Caloundra City.

With the state government now demanding the fast tracking of development approvals for that greenfield site, it is certain council will want the lack of road connectivity both within Chancellor Park and road network access to Palmview addressed in fine detail before the bulldozers move in.

But even though the document “Lessons to be Learned” about the history and legal issues associated with Chancellor Park now informs council’s whole development application team, regional director of strategy and planning Julie Edwards said there was still a learning curve on all development.

Ms Edwards said the state government’s original intent to put the regional hospital in the suburb would have led to chaos in terms of the road network.

The belated rectification of planning shortfalls started with the establishment of the Sippy Downs Town Centre which has relied on a Stringybark Road crossover and motorway access.

Retrofitted road networks pushed hard by then divisional councillor and now Kawana MP Steve Dickson will help untangle some of the mess but the solutions are expensive and left to the community to bear.

That cost is something of which council environment manager Doctor Steve Skull is acutely aware.

His team waded through through the contents of cardboard boxes containing the 100 separate planning files relating to Chancellor lakes to get a handle on how that mess was created.

One thing is certain. Council is now much more circumspect with the advice it receives from experts engaged by developers.

“Information is only as good as you accept it to be,’’ Ms Edwards said.

“Council can’t afford every type of expert but we now have in-house traffic and environment teams.

“It helps as we try to preserve independent thinking (about development applications).”

The history of the area that now is called home to several schools, a university and a resident population of 6,900 people showed that the old Maroochy Shire Council had originally wanted nothing to do with development on what was effectively drainage problem land.

Ms Edwards said the council said no to an application to develop the western half of what is now Chancellor Park. The developer appealed, there was an election and a change of council with the incoming administration deciding to settle the matter with an agreed set of conditions.

The council again changed at an election and an application to develop the eastern portion was refused outright.

The Planning Court appeal was lost by council leaving it with a subdivision which was in effect in two halves with no master plan to pull it together.

It is a sequence of events that the new regional council is determined won’t be repeated.

The “Lessons to be Learned” paper makes clear that development conditions need to be explicit and not just understood.

Dr Skull’s unenviable task to find a cost-effective way to restore water quality within the failed 10-lake system which forms the estate’s drainage train, is being watched with keen interest across Australia by an industry that has developed around artificial waterway management.

He said it would be an easy position to take to simply ban future artificial waterways.

“There are now smarter ways to work it,’’ he said. “You wouldn’t build a chain of ponds today. You would deal with drainage differently. The science around lake systems hardly existed at all when the lakes were designed.’’

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 22 July, 2008 at 8:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
no open space? fill in the lakes. two problems solved before my first cup of coffee.
on 22 July, 2008 at 9:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
There was a master plan for the Estate, I saw it when I started working at the Uni in 1996 and I saw its updated version when we bought our house in the estate. IT went to hell from there...... too many money hungry investors, businesses and whoever else that made a buck and smashed this brilliant idea. It started off as a satelite town, a town built around the University. A child could complete their entire schooling and never have to leave town....Im not sure what happened or who took the wrong turn BUT council has to take some responsibility for not watching this and many other estates closer. It is such a shame as it was a great idea and for a time a bloody top place to live work n play
on 22 July, 2008 at 9:31 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
So am I to understand decisions made by former councilors Barnes, Jones & Dickson resulted in this debacle or was it council planning officers? We seem to have a situation of current planning staff "dumping" on previous staff and councilors whilst making sure they put a plug in for anyone still around.
Chancellor Park was always going to be a problem the moment they allowed one road in and one road out. Council built houses, lakes, shops, Uni and schools without ever making plans for the roads. Don't build it unless you have the infrastructure then you won't have to retrofit. What do we learn from this? A popular elected person does not necessarily have the skills to make the right decision.
on 22 July, 2008 at 12:33 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
In spite of all the dramas, I still enjoy living in Chancellor Park. The developers may have got a lot wrong, but they also got a lot right. With the benefit of hindsight, everybody is a genius but it's not so easy when you're the first to try something new.
If the lakes cannot be fixed with a definate outcome, then they should just be filled in and people who bought waterfront should be compensated by the developers. With the amount they made for the development they would still come out on top and for most, it would be a "win win" outcome.
on 22 July, 2008 at 8:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Gee, it is good to see council listening to us.

I remember saying a few months ago right here in these columns, that one day Chancellor Park would make a good case study in "How not to do a development"

And lo and behold here it is. WOW! Thanks for listening. GUYS!

I didn't think from past experience anybody in council would have such a good idea all by themselves.

Maybe something has changed.

Oh yes and....

"WE HAVE TO INCREASE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE -ALL OVER THE COAST, NOT JUST CHANCELLOR PARK"

(....are they reading this?....)

Old Maroochy shire must have the least amount of (non beach) parkland of any region in Australia - and we wonder why kids cant be kids anymore!!
on 22 July, 2008 at 8:26 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Starting to look like a suburb of Caboolture, not the Sunshine Coast. A real rabbit warren....
on 22 July, 2008 at 11:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm with you soldier. Despite the soon to be rectified estate entry/exit dramas, Chancellor is a great place to live and bring up a family. High quality public education, beautiful bike paths and walkways meandering around the pretty ( if not effective) lake system, national park, wildlife and great shared facilities at the uni on our doorstep AND less than 10 minutes to the beaches. I am quite happy for the mistakes in planning and development to be highlighted in the hope that they are not repeated - but please don't turn it into a parochial 'my part of the coast is better than yours' jibe. Anyone lucky enough to live on the Sunny Coast should be grateful and work consructively to make it even better. Most of us have lived in less liveable places within Australia or overseas - and I bet there's not many who'd like to go back.
on 23 July, 2008 at 10:53 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hi heggiehawk,
I don't mean this personally at all, and don't think me elitist. But what has happened to the sunshine coast over the last 30 years is that people have come to the sunshine coast from far less "nice" places, but have put up with just about anything, in terms of living conditions to live here.

Some of the early stages of Sippy Downs are great, and were easily access able. But, We all know why this article was written.

The original "theme and mood" of the coast is now almost gone, and is certainly not reflected in Developments like Sippy downs.

Nobody can possibly say they are totally comfortable with living in some parts of the development where they are on 550sq m of land with 2 adults and 2-3 older kids. You only have to drive around at night to see the number of cars forced onto the street as families grow in a cramped and sometimes tense neighborhood.
In case of a civil emergency or Major flood I am sure lives in those areas would be at risk,- as there is only now 2 lengthy ways out.
Not to mention the potential for post traumatic stress such an emergency would cause. Can anybody put a price on that??

I am sure this is way better than "living in inner Sydney" for example but it could easily have been better than what it is now.

I guess what I am trying to say - people need to have higher expectations and council and developers need to set the bar higher.
Yes this is expensive in cost and land, but what price do we pay for stress, cramping, poor lifestyle and healthy environment to bring up kids? That is what people come here to get away from but developers have delivered more of the same at the expense of the character of the coast. - And people have bought into it because it is there.

Developers and Council need to work with open space and preserve what waterways and natural vegetation is left, and it may mean development spreads out to the hinterland - that is inevitable, but can have significant islands of natural vegetation in between to break it up. Space and Recreation areas for people to be people and Efficient roads to link it all with the beaches and shops.

Or we can go for something like Lutwyche or Chermside........
on 23 July, 2008 at 5:19 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
You make some very strong arguments flashnick and I take them on board. Yes, there are parts of Sippy Downs which could have been planned and developed better, and small block sizes do create the potential for problems. However, there are many other parts of Chancellor Park which are very liveable, functional and desirable. I know the point of this discussion is to highlight the bungling of the development by local council and profiteers but it does perturb me when it seems to degenerate into suburb-bashing. I have looked at the real estate pages quite closely over the past couple of years. Many of the houses in the 'more desirable' areas of the Coast (Kawana Island springs to mind) are also on small blocks and wedged tightly together. Many once-desirable houses in Buderim are on such steep slopes that much of the yard size is impractical for childrens' play and the driveways very difficult to negotiate, especially as once quiet streets have become major roads. Lest I become the suburb basher I am accusing others of being, my point is that there are good and bad points and parts of every locality. Let's learn from the mistakes of yesterday by all means and 'raise the bar' for the future. Let's also remember that these mistakes are not restricted to Sippy Downs, nor do they make it any less liveable than many other parts of the Coast.
on 24 July, 2008 at 11:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
"The science around lake systems hardly existed at all when the lakes were designed.’’

That would be one of the 'Lessons to be Learned".

We can expect, then, if it is not supported by science then it won't be approved.

Nice.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.