Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
6:17AM Monday 08 September, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly sunny min 11° - max 23°

Battle lines drawn in land rush row

A rising tide of anger against the Bligh government’s decision to force the rapid growth of greenfields on the Sunshine Coast could see direct community action that would outstrip the massive Tollbuster campaign of the early 1990s.

An emergency meeting of 16 regional community groups expected to be held in the next two weeks may be the first step in a campaign to rival the successful protest against road tolls here and, later, anger at Noosa’s forced amalgamation and the Traveston dam.

The Tollbuster campaign against the tolling of the Sunshine Motorway and the Maroochy River bridge was a factor in the ultimate defeat of the Wayne Goss-led Labor government of the time.

The Organisation of Sunshine Coast Associations of Residents has canvassed its 16 member associations to back a public meeting to protest against state government moves this week to drive another 75,000 people into the region in the short term.

OSCAR spokesman Peter Bryant said the Sunshine Coast needed to mount a Tollbuster-style campaign to convince Premier Anna Bligh she was out of step with the community.

The Sippy Downs and District Community Association has also invited Deputy Premier Paul Lucas to front a meeting on June 17 which will drive a petition to have the state government back off until it can guarantee all the hard and social infrastructure to support the growth is in place.

Association president Murray Lyons said his group was not anti-development but wanted to see a guarantee of infrastructure not only to meet the future demand but also current need.

He said residents were already stuck in daily traffic jams which would only worsen, with the Palmview South site nominated for fast-track approval only accessible through Chancellor Park.

The Sippy Downs association has launched a petition protesting at the decision and seeking a guarantee from the government that no greenfield site be brought online “before appropriate infrastructure and community facilities have been provided, including direct access to main roads and public transport, additional public hospital facilities and schools; and all normal planning processes have been completed, including environmental assessments and traffic impact studies”.

There is real anger at the government’s snubbing of Sunshine Coast Mayor Bob Abbot’s election platform promise to make the region a national model for sustainability and to bring growth back in line with the national average.

However, Sunshine Coast Environment Council head Ian Christesen says the community should save its breath with a government that ignores their opinion.

Yesterday, he was advocating that the council simply refuse to co-operate and instead tell Ms Bligh that if she wanted to fast-track development applications then the state government should do the work.

“The council is on a hiding to nothing,’’ Mr Christesen said.

“They can’t achieve what she has demanded.

“Instead of six months down the track having Ms Bligh come in saying the council wasn’t up to it and taking over the work already done, let her do it from scratch. And in the process tell her if she wants council planning documents she can go through FOI.”

Mr Christesen said the government has had the Urban Land Development Authority Act since September last year to address housing affordability, and identified sites they were to fast-track – Bowen Hills, Northshore Hamilton, Fitzgibbon, Wooloongabba and Mackay show grounds.

“According to their website www.ulda.qld.gov.au, only the first two, Bowen Hills and NorthShore Hamilton, have started any meaningful planning and have timeframes of delivery at February 2009, one and a half years after they had the Act in place.

“The other sites have not even got a draft up and still have no timeframes for delivery.

“They will not be able to deliver.”

Mr Bryant said it was clear the state government had forced amalgamation to get a pro-development rubber-stamp council.

He said Ms Bligh had been caught out by a community that had other values, an opinion expressed at local government elections across the state which expressed a pro-community vote.

“The mayor’s approach is a breath of fresh air,’’ he said.

“We want a public meeting as soon as we can get it and want public support.”

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 7 June, 2008 at 3:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Standby Ms Bligh, this is the beginning of the end for your regime, you have stood on too many toes and the public have had enough of your antics
on 7 June, 2008 at 5:25 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If you ever wanted a perfect example of why we don"t want another 75.000 people here on the coast until all the infrastucture is in place check out The Daily Telegraph newspaper in Sydney today online. I lived for 30 years with the smog etc in Sydney and I had forgotten what unpolluted air was until I came to the sunny coast.
on 7 June, 2008 at 5:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
As I understand it the three lots of housing land in question have been earmarked for housing development for some time. I don't believe that the concern is necessarily about whether or not to build these developments, but how quickly they are going to be forced onto us.

Our infrastructure is already struggling to cope and there is no offer of fast tracking additional infrastructure from the State in conjunction with this fast tracking of population growth.

Simply flooding the market with more unaffordable homes is not going to make housing more affordable. In the current economic climate, lots of houses at $400,000 - $500,000 are not going to any more affordable than the current lot of similarly priced homes.

So what is the real reason for the rush by the State to get these developments moving? I believe that we could present a strong case that the State desperately wants to continue the economic activity and employment provided by the building and property services industries.

But I don't believe that too many people accept that Housing Affordability is the key driver of this rush to develop. If they are concerned about providing low cost housing for struggling families, we have seen a whole raft of suggestions for ways in which this could be done without flooding the Coast with thousands of new homes and imigrants.

I would lay odds that when these thousands of new homes are built, they will still not be cheap enough for our local struggling families to buy them. They will be bought by a whole new wave of migrants from interstate wanting to take advantage of a cheap way to get to a "better" lifestyle.

Like many thousands before them, they will not be able to find jobs and will start complaining about how difficult it is to survive on the Coast, how greedy the local business people are and how pathetic our infrastructure is.

Flooding the Coast with thousands of new houses and migrants without first making provision for the necessary infrastructure and jobs is an excercise in futility - if not insanity.
on 7 June, 2008 at 5:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Some further info from the Sippy Downs & District Community Association:

The SDDCA will be holding a public meeting on Tuesday 17 June at 7pm at the blue hall, Chancellor State College primary campus, (end of) Scholars Drive, Sippy Downs. Guest speakers include Steve Dickson MP, Mayor Bob Abbot and Fiona Simpson, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Planning. Paul Lucas, Minister for Infrastructure and Planning has also been invited.

Parking will be available behind the hall.

This will be an opportunity to discuss this issue and sign the petition which will be tabled to the state government.

If any community groups or individuals would like to assist in obtaining signatures on the petition, please email:
sippydowns@westnet.com.au

Thank you for the support we have received so far. All emails will be replied to in due course.
on 7 June, 2008 at 7:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Anna Bligh said "a team would be established in the Department of Infrastructure and PLANNING TO BRING THE SITES TO MARKET BY THIS TIME NEXT YEAR."


Mr Oliver said "the government had MERELY brought forward the release of land already earmarked for development after realising its forecasting unit had erred in its estimates of the amount currently available.

He said development of this land WOULD NOT HAPPEN VERY QUICKLY and its release would be neither immediate nor simultaneous.

Just a little incongruous !!!


We now know which developers have their name on the deeds for the two sites ....the obvious question is are their names associated with a history of Labor Party electoral donations.

Somebody call the ABC maybe 4Corners would be interested ?

The people voted in a democracy to give Big Bob a slow-cooked-development mandate and here's the new big business party, wearing the poorer suit, not quite far enough to the right to wear the blue ribbon, still pandering to development up here on the Sunshine Coast.

They stepped around the Gold Coast Council using the regional plan as a blunt instrument and now we too are being bludgeoned against our will.

Infrastructure, belt, SEQ water, bash, Traverston, pow, CAMCOS , wham, hospitals, smash, saline plant, bam, Erwahvale, zap, Council merger costs, Biff, Police,Ambulance, FireServices, Whammo, stone mastic, crunch, Tabled in Cabinet, slip, Parlimentary Cam censorship, slither.

Rego up, insurance up, electricity up, property up, stamp duty up ..............Donations up Anna ????

It's enough to make everyone on the coast drive to George street at the next sitting, but boy that would cause a huge traffic jam and ruckus, and imagine the media scrum if something like that happened in a modern democracy.

Gentlemen .... Start your engines.
on 7 June, 2008 at 7:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
In the Draft Local Growth Management Strategy map 5.3 defines the councils intentions for the "Residential Development Strategy". You Will see that the Suburbs Maroochydore, Mooloolaba, Buderim and most of Sippy Downs are MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AREAS. The developers are already looking at existing suburbs closely especially the waterfront/ canal areas where old homes ae ready to be moved on for large unit developments. The green light has already been given.
on 7 June, 2008 at 8:39 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Its about time something was done about the housing affordability crisis. The anti-development lobby on the Sunshine Coast are nothing more than a mob of selfish people who want to keep the place to themselves and preserve the their inflated house values.

We live in one nation - just because you moved in first doesn't mean you have the right to stop others
on 7 June, 2008 at 8:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Peter Beattie and Andrew Fraser told us that we had to be amalgamated to:
1. Save money
2. Create a stronger Council.

We have learned by experience that number 1. was rubbish. Let's see if they allow our Council to be stronger.

Having said this. I believe that a Coast wide community uprising will be the only way for us to ensure that we do have a stonger Council. Go for it OSCAR.
on 7 June, 2008 at 8:48 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It's time the Coast Residents said enough is enough from this state government. The Coast clearly doesn't have the infrastructure for this ridiculous over the top development or the desire for this expansion as evidenced by the outcome of the last local election.
on 7 June, 2008 at 10:17 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ed, On reading through this story, it again highlights the lack of interest being shown by the State Government that is more interested in getting its way and not the needs of the local community. Whilst time is running out for a very incompetent government; how much more damage are we going to see inflicted on the people of Queensland? It is now more urgent that our needs are sent via a loud and clear message to the government. I would support any action by the residents of the Sunshine Coast and perhaps, the Sippy Downs Association should allow online readers to sign a electronic copy of their petition via their website? At present, this population explosion is unsustainable and will continue to place great strain on our way of life. We don't have to look far at how the Queensland Government and the Brisbane City Council's policies are affecting people's lives when over 500 Brisbane residents are going or are now experiencing displacement all for the sake-of-progress. The people of the Sunshine Coast need to become more active even though, as Mr Christesen says, the community should save its breath etc. Taking his statement into consideration, for too many years now, we as voters/ratepayers have allowed governments to dictate to us and impose their will on us and to a degree, are more interested in addressing the needs of the minority. Even here at Redcliffe, we see the duplication of the Houghton Highway underway and yet, 90 per cent of the traffic use it as an alternative to the Bruce Highway through to Mango Hill - Northlakes. It's also a valid point that infrastructure should be put in place before residential development. I want a future for our children.
on 7 June, 2008 at 11:24 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
billm - why do you think this plan by the state government is going to cure the housing affordability crisis. The end prices are not going to be any more affordable and your rates are going to skyrocket to meet the infrastructure issues that are surely going to follow this madness - your quality of community is going to be put under pressure. All for what? So more of us can live in the one area? Where is the upside of fast tracking a population boom?
on 7 June, 2008 at 11:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
In reply to News_Watcher's comments, I advise that an e-petition (online petition) has also been set up.

www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/EPetition...

Click on 'current petitions' then on title - Fast-tracking of housing development, Sunshine Coast.

Any inquires re the paper or electronic petition should be directed to sippydowns@westnet.com.au

Thanks for your interest.
on 7 June, 2008 at 12:15 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
And further to the e-petition, the direct link is:

www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/EPetition...

Please forward to any interested people. We want to be heard.
on 7 June, 2008 at 2:57 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ed. Again thanks for the publishing of my thoughts on this news item and also to sippydownsview re the link to the E/Petition. In response to the posting by sunnyone44, we don't need to go far to see smog. On Friday, I ventured to a northern suburb of Brisbane with my wife and Brisbane was covered in a blanket of smog. I awaiting to hear a response from the Moreton Bay Regional Council re the government's parcel of land here at Northlakes and at Morayfield.
on 7 June, 2008 at 3:02 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Wow - you lot of whingers have really carried on today ... and all about NOTHING !

Didn't you see the follow-up article, "We won't be swamped with people: developers " ?

See, its all fine ! Anna wouldn't embark on a self-serving mission and the developers wouldn't mislead anyone for their own financial gain. See, its fine.


PS I've already signed the petition too :) We've already seen once this week how hard the government need to be forced into taking responsible action and I hope those organising this campaign know the callibre of people they are up against (let's just say they don't respond to polite requests, there must be political ramifications before they will act !)
on 7 June, 2008 at 3:26 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Let me suggest that critics obtain a copy of the South East QLD Regional Plan. These sites were already earmarked for development!

The benefit now is that the state has taken the control off the local council in an effort to address major affordability issues. This way the land should be delivered in a timely, cost efficient manner.

What would the new Mayor know about delivering affordable housing? During his Noosa days his solution was a population cap which did nothing but skyrocket median house prices!

Perhaps if the Council's weren't so anti development in the first place and took a proactive position with respect to structured roll out of adequate land supply then the state wouldnt have been forced to take action and local Council's would have had more control.

Like any development these ones will be staged and delivered based on the demand in the market place.

The two major sites (Palmview and Caloundra South) would most likely be at the affordable end of the spectrum where demand is exceptionally high.

Good on the state for taking this long overdue action!

Hopefully the age old Australian dream will eventually become within reach for those that were resigned to the fact they would rent for the rest of their life!
on 7 June, 2008 at 3:27 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
For those of you think a National Party government would be an alternative I suggest you get a copy of this weeks Coolum and North Shore News to see which developer pushed Fiona Simpson's campaign along very nicely thank you. We now know why Ms Simpson choose to ignore the pleas of help from her constituents on the north shore.
Beware the ghost of Joh......
on 7 June, 2008 at 4:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I've signed the petition...

There should be no more major development on the coast until there is a train line to the city.

Otherwise, the roads will just get more packed and the train from Landsborough standing room only.
on 8 June, 2008 at 1:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I don't think anyone disagrees the subject areas have, for a long time, been identified as future development. The simple problem is the lack of infastructure planning that has come with this State Govt led plan.
I cannot understand how speeding up this release will solve anything, let alone the affordability issue. I have to agree that we need to just step back for a moment and process the backlog of approvals in council then look at where we are.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.