12:00a.m. 7th June 2008
A rising tide of anger against the Bligh government’s decision to force the rapid growth of greenfields on the Sunshine Coast could see direct community action that would outstrip the massive Tollbuster campaign of the early 1990s.
An emergency meeting of 16 regional community groups expected to be held in the next two weeks may be the first step in a campaign to rival the successful protest against road tolls here and, later, anger at Noosa’s forced amalgamation and the Traveston dam.
The Tollbuster campaign against the tolling of the Sunshine Motorway and the Maroochy River bridge was a factor in the ultimate defeat of the Wayne Goss-led Labor government of the time.
The Organisation of Sunshine Coast Associations of Residents has canvassed its 16 member associations to back a public meeting to protest against state government moves this week to drive another 75,000 people into the region in the short term.
OSCAR spokesman Peter Bryant said the Sunshine Coast needed to mount a Tollbuster-style campaign to convince Premier Anna Bligh she was out of step with the community.
The Sippy Downs and District Community Association has also invited Deputy Premier Paul Lucas to front a meeting on June 17 which will drive a petition to have the state government back off until it can guarantee all the hard and social infrastructure to support the growth is in place.
Association president Murray Lyons said his group was not anti-development but wanted to see a guarantee of infrastructure not only to meet the future demand but also current need.
He said residents were already stuck in daily traffic jams which would only worsen, with the Palmview South site nominated for fast-track approval only accessible through Chancellor Park.
The Sippy Downs association has launched a petition protesting at the decision and seeking a guarantee from the government that no greenfield site be brought online “before appropriate infrastructure and community facilities have been provided, including direct access to main roads and public transport, additional public hospital facilities and schools; and all normal planning processes have been completed, including environmental assessments and traffic impact studies”.
There is real anger at the government’s snubbing of Sunshine Coast Mayor Bob Abbot’s election platform promise to make the region a national model for sustainability and to bring growth back in line with the national average.
However, Sunshine Coast Environment Council head Ian Christesen says the community should save its breath with a government that ignores their opinion.
Yesterday, he was advocating that the council simply refuse to co-operate and instead tell Ms Bligh that if she wanted to fast-track development applications then the state government should do the work.
“The council is on a hiding to nothing,’’ Mr Christesen said.
“They can’t achieve what she has demanded.
“Instead of six months down the track having Ms Bligh come in saying the council wasn’t up to it and taking over the work already done, let her do it from scratch. And in the process tell her if she wants council planning documents she can go through FOI.”
Mr Christesen said the government has had the Urban Land Development Authority Act since September last year to address housing affordability, and identified sites they were to fast-track – Bowen Hills, Northshore Hamilton, Fitzgibbon, Wooloongabba and Mackay show grounds.
“According to their website www.ulda.qld.gov.au, only the first two, Bowen Hills and NorthShore Hamilton, have started any meaningful planning and have timeframes of delivery at February 2009, one and a half years after they had the Act in place.
“The other sites have not even got a draft up and still have no timeframes for delivery.
“They will not be able to deliver.”
Mr Bryant said it was clear the state government had forced amalgamation to get a pro-development rubber-stamp council.
He said Ms Bligh had been caught out by a community that had other values, an opinion expressed at local government elections across the state which expressed a pro-community vote.
“The mayor’s approach is a breath of fresh air,’’ he said.
“We want a public meeting as soon as we can get it and want public support.”
Recent Comments
Our infrastructure is already struggling to cope and there is no offer of fast tracking additional infrastructure from the State in conjunction with this fast tracking of population growth.
Simply flooding the market with more unaffordable homes is not going to make housing more affordable. In the current economic climate, lots of houses at $400,000 - $500,000 are not going to any more affordable than the current lot of similarly priced homes.
So what is the real reason for the rush by the State to get these developments moving? I believe that we could present a strong case that the State desperately wants to continue the economic activity and employment provided by the building and property services industries.
But I don't believe that too many people accept that Housing Affordability is the key driver of this rush to develop. If they are concerned about providing low cost housing for struggling families, we have seen a whole raft of suggestions for ways in which this could be done without flooding the Coast with thousands of new homes and imigrants.
I would lay odds that when these thousands of new homes are built, they will still not be cheap enough for our local struggling families to buy them. They will be bought by a whole new wave of migrants from interstate wanting to take advantage of a cheap way to get to a "better" lifestyle.
Like many thousands before them, they will not be able to find jobs and will start complaining about how difficult it is to survive on the Coast, how greedy the local business people are and how pathetic our infrastructure is.
Flooding the Coast with thousands of new houses and migrants without first making provision for the necessary infrastructure and jobs is an excercise in futility - if not insanity.
The SDDCA will be holding a public meeting on Tuesday 17 June at 7pm at the blue hall, Chancellor State College primary campus, (end of) Scholars Drive, Sippy Downs. Guest speakers include Steve Dickson MP, Mayor Bob Abbot and Fiona Simpson, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Planning. Paul Lucas, Minister for Infrastructure and Planning has also been invited.
Parking will be available behind the hall.
This will be an opportunity to discuss this issue and sign the petition which will be tabled to the state government.
If any community groups or individuals would like to assist in obtaining signatures on the petition, please email:
sippydowns@westnet.com.au
Thank you for the support we have received so far. All emails will be replied to in due course.
Mr Oliver said "the government had MERELY brought forward the release of land already earmarked for development after realising its forecasting unit had erred in its estimates of the amount currently available.
He said development of this land WOULD NOT HAPPEN VERY QUICKLY and its release would be neither immediate nor simultaneous.
Just a little incongruous !!!
We now know which developers have their name on the deeds for the two sites ....the obvious question is are their names associated with a history of Labor Party electoral donations.
Somebody call the ABC maybe 4Corners would be interested ?
The people voted in a democracy to give Big Bob a slow-cooked-development mandate and here's the new big business party, wearing the poorer suit, not quite far enough to the right to wear the blue ribbon, still pandering to development up here on the Sunshine Coast.
They stepped around the Gold Coast Council using the regional plan as a blunt instrument and now we too are being bludgeoned against our will.
Infrastructure, belt, SEQ water, bash, Traverston, pow, CAMCOS , wham, hospitals, smash, saline plant, bam, Erwahvale, zap, Council merger costs, Biff, Police,Ambulance, FireServices, Whammo, stone mastic, crunch, Tabled in Cabinet, slip, Parlimentary Cam censorship, slither.
Rego up, insurance up, electricity up, property up, stamp duty up ..............Donations up Anna ????
It's enough to make everyone on the coast drive to George street at the next sitting, but boy that would cause a huge traffic jam and ruckus, and imagine the media scrum if something like that happened in a modern democracy.
Gentlemen .... Start your engines.
We live in one nation - just because you moved in first doesn't mean you have the right to stop others
1. Save money
2. Create a stronger Council.
We have learned by experience that number 1. was rubbish. Let's see if they allow our Council to be stronger.
Having said this. I believe that a Coast wide community uprising will be the only way for us to ensure that we do have a stonger Council. Go for it OSCAR.
www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/EPetition...
Click on 'current petitions' then on title - Fast-tracking of housing development, Sunshine Coast.
Any inquires re the paper or electronic petition should be directed to sippydowns@westnet.com.au
Thanks for your interest.
www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/EPetition...
Please forward to any interested people. We want to be heard.
Didn't you see the follow-up article, "We won't be swamped with people: developers " ?
See, its all fine ! Anna wouldn't embark on a self-serving mission and the developers wouldn't mislead anyone for their own financial gain. See, its fine.
PS I've already signed the petition too :) We've already seen once this week how hard the government need to be forced into taking responsible action and I hope those organising this campaign know the callibre of people they are up against (let's just say they don't respond to polite requests, there must be political ramifications before they will act !)
The benefit now is that the state has taken the control off the local council in an effort to address major affordability issues. This way the land should be delivered in a timely, cost efficient manner.
What would the new Mayor know about delivering affordable housing? During his Noosa days his solution was a population cap which did nothing but skyrocket median house prices!
Perhaps if the Council's weren't so anti development in the first place and took a proactive position with respect to structured roll out of adequate land supply then the state wouldnt have been forced to take action and local Council's would have had more control.
Like any development these ones will be staged and delivered based on the demand in the market place.
The two major sites (Palmview and Caloundra South) would most likely be at the affordable end of the spectrum where demand is exceptionally high.
Good on the state for taking this long overdue action!
Hopefully the age old Australian dream will eventually become within reach for those that were resigned to the fact they would rent for the rest of their life!
Beware the ghost of Joh......
There should be no more major development on the coast until there is a train line to the city.
Otherwise, the roads will just get more packed and the train from Landsborough standing room only.
I cannot understand how speeding up this release will solve anything, let alone the affordability issue. I have to agree that we need to just step back for a moment and process the backlog of approvals in council then look at where we are.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again