Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
1:32AM Friday 29 August, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Possible shower min 12° - max 22°

Fury over fast-track of housing plans

Deputy premier Paul Lucas has heard first hand just how unhappy the Coast community is with plans to bring forward development approval of major greenfield sites.

Coast mayor Bob Abbot and regional director of strategy and planning Warren Bunker met the state minister for infrastructure and planning on Tuesday to drive home the concerns about the bringing forward of the SEQ regional plan review by 12 months and the decision to fast-track the approval of land that would house an additional 75,000 people.

And a meeting at Sippy Downs saw more than 200 people say while they were not against development per se, they were concerned at the pace of it.

Mr Abbot addressed the meeting, saying he told Mr Lucas there was a fundamental need to bring infrastructure forward with development.

“He is listening,” Mr Abbot said. “But he is determined to make something happen. His philosophy is to get blocks on the ground.”

Mr Abbot said the bottom line was that the state had made a decision it was sticking to and council had to do something with it or risk being shut out of the process.

“The Sunshine Coast is a specific area,’’ he said.

“We want to compete with the Gold Coast on our terms, not theirs.

“If we start to become the Gold Coast, we will all lose.”

Mr Abbot also told Mr Lucas many other Brisbane fringe regions were “screaming out’’ for more residents including the Esk-Kilcoy area, Logan, the Somerset region and Ipswich.

He said planners were saying the land could be developed in those areas, but residents preferred to live in the coastal areas.

Meeting organiser Murray Lyons said an e-petition to state parliament for Coast residents to sign could be found at www.parliament.qld.gov.au.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 19 June, 2008 at 12:15 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Further to the e-petition:

We have nearly 500 signatures, but surely we can send a louder message.

The direct link is:

www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/EPetition...

Please click on this link, ask everyone in your household to sign the petition and forward to anyone else in your address book that you think will support this. All residents of Queensland are eligible to sign. Residents under 18 can sign the petition as long as they understand what they are signing.

If you agree that the fast-tracking of these development sites on the Sunshine Coast should NOT proceed without adequate infrastructure and community facilities being provided, please take the time to sign the petition.
on 19 June, 2008 at 5:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"...the bottom line was that the state had made a decision it was sticking to and council had to do something with it or risk being shut out of the process."

That pretty much sums it up doesn't it?
on 19 June, 2008 at 10:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Locals... just face it, the future for the sunshine coast is the gold coast! no need to hide behind feathers saying that "We have our own terms" at the end of the day southerners are attracted to the sunbelt regions, with internal migration they bring cash and spend up big in our community.

Sunshine Coast will be a replica of the Gold Coast in the next 20-30 Years so suck it up and enjoy the benefits that it will bring to the economy and the region.
on 19 June, 2008 at 11:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
easy fix

fast track as much as they want but all infrastructure (water, sewage, electricity, roads, schools etc) must be the responsibility of the developer. Then the true value of the properties they sell will be known.
on 19 June, 2008 at 1:22 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Excalibar, yes, the bully State Government is still at it.

I thought bullying was illegal? I am not allow to do it at work but obviously Captain Bligh and her scurvy riddled crew are above the law.

Their mentor Pirate Pete proved that on many occassions.
on 21 June, 2008 at 7:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Why are there only two developers lands that will be fast tracked for subdivision and these two developers are the bigest developers around.

If only two developments get the go ahead, then they will only release a small number of blocks at the one time to keep demand really high and to increase prices every time they release another small stage of their development.

Because there are only two developers that are chosen, are they caption Bligh's mates and will the state government get a kick back for the state government choosing them. This sounds like a state government Coles and Woolworth engineered duopoly.

Shouldn't the state government choose a lot of smaller developers who will all release land at the same time , thereby making competition from each other and at the same time keeping the price of land down.

With more competition, everybody generally wins.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.