12:00a.m. 3rd March 2008
Mayoral candidate Joe Natoli says rival candidate Bob Abbot’s claims the Coast can be landfill-free by 2020 are rubbish and has demanded the Noosa mayor release the cost of the plans.
The demand comes as a community group accused Mr Natoli of using political scare tactics to mislead voters about the cost of stopping work on a proposed bioreactor dump near Yandina.
Kulangoor Anti Dump Action Group chairman Peter Sheen said Mr Natoli had quoted inflated figures during a recent television news interview.
“Joe Natoli’s claim that ratepayers would pay an extra $105 million a year to transport waste to Ipswich if the Kulangoor dump did not go ahead is wildly exaggerated,” Mr Sheen said.
Mr Natoli said he made a mistake during the interview but residents would still be slugged with higher rates if work on the dump stopped.
He said trucking waste to Ipswich would cost ratepayers an extra $150 each year and create an unacceptable amount of greenhouse gas emissions.
He said the Coast needed landfill and Mr Abbot’s plan to get rid of dumps was not achievable without a sharp increase in rates.
“He is going to impose increased costs on every ratepayer and he needs to tell people just how much it’s going to cost,” Mr Natoli said.
Mr Abbot said he did not know how much it would cost but his goals were achievable.
“I know it’s done elsewhere and we will find the right way to do it,” Mr Abbot said.
“If we’re going to start throwing around figures with regards to waste, it would be good to see the information Maroochy Shire Council based the Kulangoor decision on.”
Mr Natoli said he had invited Mr Abbot to a technical briefing last year but Mr Abbot did not accept the invitation. Mr Abbot said he did not recall the invitation and could not remember what he had been doing at the time of the briefing.
For our election coverage and candidates nominating for council, visit our election '08 page.
Recent Comments
We should be looking for attributes of these candidates who will serve us as our representative, and manage the council in the interests of all who reside in the region.
Garbage disposal, like all waste management system, is evolving as science generates better methods of disposal. The council will have engineers and other specialists to advise and recommend our needs. We need representatives, councillor and mayor who have the nous to select the best system to suit our budget now and in the future.
So, look beyond the pile of rubbish promoted any one interest group pushing their man to protect their interests.
We need a leader that will best serve the region and that is not just the northern sector.
Maroochy Shire has NO published timeframes or hard targets for reducing waste to landfills- go look at their website if you have any doubts - it is a breath of fresh air to see Bob Abbot is open minded about alternative waste mangement, and he is right- it can be done.
If we keep going the way of the Maroochy Shire Council, there will be a landfill near EVERYONE'S backyard- I live at Kulangoor and there are landfills (old or current) at Buderim, Bli Bli, Woombye, Coolum- in a hundred years time you might be hard pressed to find a town that DOESN'T have a landfill!!
It's time for a change of leadership!
Regarding Mayor Natoli's problem with trucking waste to Swanbank, what's wrong with using rail to ship the waste.
Trevor Thompson
Yandina
www.zerowaste.sa.gov.au
the second
www.zerowastewa.com.au
Examples of forward thinking- this is what we need- not locking ouselves into outdated Bioreactors that NEED massive quantities of organic matter to keep them running for the next 30 years- we should be setting targets for reducing the amount of waste to landfill, not encouragment to keep things as they are.
We produce it, we dispose of it.
I am amazed the only answer a candidate can come up with is "dump it anywhere but here!" Using this logic Ipswich may say we don't want to treat sewerage anymore, so lets truck it to the Sunshine Coast as they seem to have more mud rakers than us.
The community also needs a resource recovery solution which MINIMISES WASTE TO LANDFILL and negates the need for a new dumps.
This view is also supported by the Minister for Sustainability, Climate Change and Innovation, the Hon Andrew McNamara, when KADAG met with him last week, as well as 20 candidates from all Divisions on the Coast.
There is a clear choice between candidates who support KADAG's view, are open to new ideas and are prepared to investigate modern alternatives as opposed to those who prefer to use scare tactics and secrecy.
For more details check this link
http://www.bioreactor.org.au/News31.htm
Peter Sheen
President KADAG Inc
As they quarry, they fill at a dramatically reduced rate to the existing and proposed Kulangoor one...and what would be the problem with quarrying and stockpiling the rock if necessary??
We have never been given the opportunity to see the figures and business plans involved in any of the discussed options/proposals, and the Maroochy ratepayer has not been given the opportunity to choose environmental responsibility against ongoing landfill.
Joe and co have just made the decision for us, why weren't the community given the opportunity to debate and decide landfill cost vs. user pays and radical recycling/reuse options??
Let it be the same as water consumption, if you aren't prepared to recycle dramatically then pay the cost of disposing of your rubbish.
It's not a case of dump it anywhere but here, but be responsible, forward thinking and give the community the opportunity to be both.
I am sure ratepayers would prefer to see that money put to developing a truly responsible resource recovery strategy
looking locally can somtimes be like looking at a tree, and not seeing the forest
looking at waste management from a regional, or even a state wide perspective may in the long run be more enviromentally aware than deciding to dig a hole in your backyard and burying your garbage
to me finding an old quarry site eg Rinker, or even Ipswich, makes more sense than filling a fertile valley with garbage- i don't think thats looking very far ahead at all.
I think we should be looking 100 years into the future- what do you think our descendants will say if we continue to pepper our landscape, and fertile ground with landfills every 10 kilometres?
I am all for acting responsibly- and no, sending it to Ipswich is not the only alternative on offer- there are others. If some cost more, but are better for the environment then i so go for it, and hang the expense.
We dont need to dump our rubbish in Ipswich or anywhere else if we have a solution which minimises waste to landfill by modern resource recovery solutions. In fact we dont need any new dumps period.
Not being a waste disposal expert I cannot but take on board those suggestions and results of research presented on the web site and related links.
I also note the reference to the upcoming elections and the result of your survey of the candidates. I did a search on councils web site of meetings and the last reference I found to Kulangoor Bioreactor was 23rd May 2007 at which time a motion to look at the Ferntree Bioreactor in relation to Kulangoor was lost with only Cr's McKay, Tatton & Dunne voting for.
On 13th Sept 2006 there is also a unanimous decision to thank all those involved in the selection of the site, etc. I find it interesting that some of those people now appear on your survey as against the project!
As one who does recycle (yellow bin full every week, green bin 1 bag each week) I will happily support any proposal where we handle our waste within our region to the benefit of the entire state.
could the sub/ed leave the clever stuff to the commentariatte [machiatomachiavellis as there called north of the junction]
Be lateral fellas and solve another pressing local issue put the rubbish in the potholes.
As an indication I live in the Caloundra area and we have a landfill site which is heavily biased towards maximum recycling and being environmentily based not a stinking mess like the Maroochy shire sites at Buderim and Nambour.
For me its Big Bob all the way.
why not?- we keep asking that!
I've spoken to many local people and the lack of an annual clean-up service is certainly an issue in Division 8, one that I intend to change.
Waste management planning needs to be reviewed on a regional basis and I'm convinced, after that review, that the Kulangoor dump will be confirmed as NOT the way to go!
And another quick comment: Even if Joe's figures are accurate (and I doubt they are), I believe the social and environmental cost of the Kulangoor dump far outweighs the costs for alternative solutions.
Jeff Watson.
Candidate for Division 8
www.jeffwatson.com.au
"Power to the People"
a 5 k radius of the proposed Bioreactor. The decision was made, without community consultation, and much of what has gone on since their decision to choose The Ferntree Creek site has gone on behind closed doors. As Bob Abbot has promised to represent the Rate Payers with open and accountable government and allow all of the facts and figures to be put out there IN THE COMMUNITY in relation to the bioreactor andalternative sites, my vote certainly goes with Bob Abbott on Saturday.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again