Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
national
world
9:10PM Saturday 05 July, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Thunderstorms min 13° - max 19°

Natoli vows to make homes affordable

Sunshine Coast mayoral contender Joe Natoli has today unveiled a new plan which he says will allow people to buy their own home - through a co-operative - for under $160,000, slashing mortgage payments.

Mr Natoli said the affordable housing project was desperately needed on the Coast as young people struggled with rising interest rates - and soaring land and buildings costs.

“It would bring mortgage repayments down from around $3400 per month to about $1230 per month, which would bring it within the reach of a great deal more people.”

“As I’ve toured the Sunshine Coast, affordability is one of the key issues that keeps coming up. We have to look at alternative ways of providing people with a way to own their own home. Doing what we’ve always done, doesn’t work anymore,” he said.

“My plan is to establish a ‘social investing’ co-operative. It’s just like people can invest in green companies, but in this case they are investing in the Sunshine Coast as a co-operative to purchase large parcels of land.”

“People are then able to lease the land, to build their home. This reduces the most expensive component of home ownership – the land.”

“Investors would still receive a return on their investment, possible tax advantages and the knowledge they’re helping others on the Sunshine Coast,” he said.

“One of the major four banks has also indicated a keen interest in being involved.”

The houses would be designed for the environment – saving energy and water, which would in turn, would reduce costs in the future.

“People would also be able to build one or two bedroom homes which means young people, young families and retirees could build homes along side each other. That also builds communities and neighbourhoods,” Mr Natoli said.

“People are saying to me that they fear Bob Abbot’s policies will force prices up even further and cripple the construction industry.”

“This place cannot be just for the rich. I will make sure we have affordability and sustainable growth,” Mr Natoli said. “Plus a future for our children.”

“I have also committed to an ‘Affordable Housing Summit’ within 60 days of being elected to office. This think tank would be charged with finding out exactly why we have a shortage of land available and why there are so few rental properties as well.”

“We need to know why demand outstrips supply to such an extent that rentals on the Sunshine Coast went up 22% last year compared to the state average of 10%.”

Noosa mayor Bob Abbot said Noosa had tried to get an affordable housing trial off the ground a few years ago but had been hampered by a lack of availability of cheaper land and housing.

He said Mr Natoli's plan seemed to have 'no given role' for the council while it was a 'very complicated process'.

"There is also no exit strategy that I can see at all,'' he said questioning what would people do who wanted to get out of the scheme.

He said while it may help some people in the short term, there was no guarantee of long term affordability.

Mr Abbot said he believed a better approach would be to team up with the Federal Government on Kevin Rudd's plan to release 100,000 affordable rental homes by creating investment incentives.

"The mechanism is now there to make a trial a work,'' he said, noting the need to have both developers and the federal government involved.

Mr Abbot also denied suggestions by Mr Natoli that a Noosa-style council would lead to soaring home prices and impact on the construction industry.

He said Noosa's two percent growth was enough to sustain the construction industry while ensuring that housing remained as affordable as possible, apart from in the prime waterfront and canal areas.

"There is no industry people out of work anymore here than anywhere else,'' he said.

Mr Abbot said in the 30 years he had been involved in the construction industry he had seen three booms and three busts - which could be attributed to unchecked growth.

He said too often it was the local subbies who got burnt when out of towners moved in when there was a boom time - and left the region without paying their bills when there was a slowdown.

Email this story
Print this story

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 4 March, 2008 at 1:33 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Good idea Joe, however I would not be mixing oldies with the young families, the reason I say this is that there would be a very high domestic argument rate amoung the younger ones and also there would be a very high crime rate eventually. Look at what has happened high density housing commission areas around the place ie Brisbane, but there needs to be something done, away from the oldies please.
on 4 March, 2008 at 1:40 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Interesting idea. Worth thinking about. A few more details would be helpful.

Who will own the house and land purchased for $160,000. Does the purchaser own it or the Co-operative ? Or both ?

Does the purchaser own the house, and the Co-operative maintain ownership of the land ?

What happens when the purchaser decides to sell ? Do they have to sell for $160,000, or full market value ? Or do they only get to sell the house, but not the land.
on 4 March, 2008 at 2:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm all for lower house prices, but is the rent on the land going to be equal to the rent on an apartment? If that is the case there is no point as you'll be paying rent AND paying a mortgage.

However combined with the Rudd Governments scheme I have heard about, to allow people to save money towards a house tax free, we might finally be getting somewhere.
on 4 March, 2008 at 2:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Another thought. If the Co-op is going to lease the land to the "buyer" why wouldn't it just own the house and land, and lease them the whole package out at reduced rates. Why make these struggling people have to take out a mortgage at all ?

The co-op rental idea has already been floated several times in these blogs. However, the suggestion then was that the Co-op is owned by one or several levels of government rather than private investors.
on 4 March, 2008 at 2:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Atapro, if people are invested to the extent that they have some ownership, they will be more likely to care and maintain the place and feel they have some security which will never be offered to someone renting. The other problem with renting it out, is a change of government/council will not guarantee the rents will stay at a reasonable level and could end up being one big cash cow for developers
on 4 March, 2008 at 2:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Could the reason for the land shortage possibly be due to onerous requirements for infrastructure placed on the developers? Perhaps that is something the federal government should be looking at - throwing serious money at infrastructure development with some forward thinking for growth.
on 4 March, 2008 at 3 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Isn't it amazing the straws that some people grasp at when they are in danger of losing their mayoralty?

Housing affordability has long been a major issue for a lot of people on the coast, Joe, yet you have said nothing about it before.

Why are you now coming up with these suggestions?
on 4 March, 2008 at 3:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Lets get back to basics, has anyone looked at how much land the developers are landbanking? This could be the real reason land and everything that follows is so expensive.
on 4 March, 2008 at 3:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
OK Jessica. Valid point. So we basically want the buyers to pay a $160,000 bond to make sure that they look after the place. We wouldn't want them to make a killing out of buying cheap and selling high would we ?
on 4 March, 2008 at 3:31 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
KING: Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, good morning and welcome to 612 ABC Brisbane. PM: Good morning Madonna, thanks for having me on the program. KING: Can you fix home loan affordability? PM: No we can’t fix it. What we can do is do whatever we can within the powers of Government to improve it.

http://www.pm.gov.au/media/Interview/200.... That is the position of our Prime Minister in a radio interview yesterday on the ABC's 4QR station. The full transcript is available on the above link.

So with official interest rates at a all time high; where to from here? The Federal Government can only do a certain amount and after listening to the Federal Treasurer on local radio here in Brisbane earlier today, I think legislative action is now required.

Noting that there's a inquiry into food prices, the government has to introduce a national price control system where the ACCC has the power to say yes or no to a business (major) increasing their prices?

Whilst there was overwhelming support across the Australian electorate for a change-of-government, the Rudd government doesn't have much time to try and stop the rot that is going on within Australia.

The government must tighten the credit laws which prevents people from being dishonest when seeking credit and to a degree, a home loan. Australians have become much greedier than a couple of decades ago and I have no doubt that there's much more pain ahead.

With the Reserve Bank Board's decision to increase rates further; where does it stop? Yes, we have enjoy economic good times over the last 12 or more years but it can't continue. Why shouldn't Australians be able to own their own home?

I know that I would love to and it has to be made more attractive but blocking mechanisms are currently in place.

When we read through the extracted comments aired on the ABC's 4QR program yesterday morning; can the federal government do more to help with Australians owning their own home?

Having read through the above comments posted so far, Joe Natoli's vision/plan has some merit but more debate is needed. I would also draw attention to a media release from Senator Andrew Bartlett (Australian Democrat Queensland) re this housing affordability issue.
on 4 March, 2008 at 4:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Nice idea Joe, but what has it got to do with Local Government, and the duties/responsibilities of a Mayor?

Or are you planning for post 15th March?
on 4 March, 2008 at 5:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Land Shortage Joe? You must have not read the draft Maroochy Local Growth Management Strategy let alone those from Noosa or Caloundra. You know that we have more than enough land to meet demand past 2026!

The developers across Australia are pushing the line that land costs are too high because of planning schemes and infrastructure charges. They want the Texas way of no planning and anything goes model. Supposedly to force down land costs.

This has found its way here via the UDIA and with the release of a report by Dr Alan Moran of the IPA (a right wing lobby group). This report was given some credibility as it pertains to be via the Sunshine Coast University yet was funded by a developer.

Land banking is a major problem here. For example Nostalgia Park at Pacific Paradise was approved for development a couple of years ago but it is now back on the market undeveloped. There is another site in Mudjimba which is suffering the same fate. Lend Lease took some 12 years to bring all the land in Twin Waters to market.

Forget the summit Joe and politcial grandstanding on this matter.
on 4 March, 2008 at 6:22 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
joes got a messiah complex
he thinks he's kevin rudd [who I'll bet he didnt vote for]
could bob release his whaling policy
lets try to stay local and relevant
a good start would be some defining of whats possible,
I know its a super council but lets not get carried away
joe your not clarke kent.
on 4 March, 2008 at 7:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Capitalism 101 - create the problem - High housing costs. Provide a solution - we own the land you build the house. Ultimate end - the capitalists hold the people to ransom. For a century the system is stacked against the battler. If the people would open their eyes and have the guts to stand together and change a corrupt system, we all would live more comfortable lives. Then again JFK and Pres, Lincoln did and they got shot.. Hmmm any takers?
on 5 March, 2008 at 10:23 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
it's a bit late now saying you will you will?
You never had my vote to begin with.
and this is why, you are a gonna do this gonna do that.
on 5 March, 2008 at 6:17 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
And what happens when we've run out of land? There is only a finite supply of stuff. I am sick of hearing about how we have to make land more affordable, and how we have to release more of the stuff.

I don't think Joe's idea will solve the problem of housing affordability. Same goes with the idiotic suggestions people keep putting forward about releasing more land for buildling. It won't solve the problem - it will only postpone it for a generation at the most.

Let's start talking about helping people to buy houses rather than build them, and then we might be talking about a sustainable, long term solution.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.