Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
5:52AM Sunday 23 November, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly sunny min 17° - max 25°

Coast stores fined for over-charging

Two Sunshine Coast supermarkets are among the Queensland stores which have been fined by the Office of Fair Trading for over-charging their customers at the checkout.

One in three grocery stores checked by the state’s fair trading officers have been found to be ripping off customers at the checkout by scanning their groceries at higher prices than advertised.

Among those fined were the 7-Eleven at Marcoola and the Palmwoods Supermarket.

The Marcoola store was fined $2000 plus court costs for overcharging on seven items, which boosted the bill by $1.10.

Last year, the Palmwoods Supermarket was fined $3500 plus costs for having six items overpriced which added up to just over $1 extra on the bill.

Queensland Attorney-General Kerry Shine said today that the fines were about keeping retailers accountable and ensuring their scanners accurately reflected the price on the shelves.

Office of Fair Trading inspectors had caught a number of retailers with inaccurate scanners at their checkout, charging consumers more for an item than it was marked on the shelf, he said.

Mr Shine said a total of 282 businesses were checked during inspections in February and March, and it was found almost 32 per cent of businesses had at least one item which was overcharged when scanned.

He said a number of serious fines had been handed down by courts.

They also included the IGA Supermarket at Upper Coomera on the Gold Coast, which was slugged $5000 plus court costs for having 25 items overpriced which added an extra $9 on to the bill.

“Now $9 may not sound like a lot of money to some people but when items are sold to many customers over a day, that total quickly racks up to greater profits for the retailer at the expense of consumers who can’t afford it,” Mr Shine said.

The latest figures were a dramatic reduction on inspections done during the Christmas-New Year period, when around 46 per cent of businesses had at least one inaccurate item, he said.

“This shows that businesses are getting the message,” Mr Shine said.

“Those recently fined were found to have a system where a large number of items were scanned inaccurately, resulting in customers getting ripped off.”

Management at 7 Eleven and the Palmwoods IGA declined to comment on the matter when contacted by thedaily.com.au today.

The Office of Fair Trading statement comes as Sunshine Coast charity groups have revealed that they are facing increasing demand for help from families which are coming under pressure as the cost of basic foods spirals.

— AAP

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 2 May, 2008 at 1:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
After looking at the announced Woolworths company profit results , seems to me they nabbed the wrong guys.

And you thought Ned Kelly rode a horse !
on 2 May, 2008 at 3:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
It seems like a large fine for such a small sum. I would like to know if the problem was a faulty Scanner, Barcode or human error or a plain add on (Cheating) If it was later I would be more concerned. When you think about the very large supermarkets and if their scanners are wrong for even one day think of the Dollars.
on 2 May, 2008 at 6:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The Marcoola 7 Eleven gave me a discount the other day when there was trouble with the previous customer's card and the till was jammed....running a small business is difficult...shame it's usually only bad press that gets read.
on 3 May, 2008 at 6:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I have noticed at my local supermarket that when prices rise it is by an average of 6cents per item some are less some are more but the usual benchmark appears by and large to be 6 cents. I did my fortnightly shop yesterday and yes once again prices had risen on a couple of staple items but it was when I got to the pet food aisle I got the biggest shock. The manufacturers of a popular brand had merely changed the way the can looked and for that the food had gone from $1.29 to $1.35 for one 85gram tin of a type of tuna. Cans that were still on the shelf that were of the older look were also $1,35 same brand . These particular cans of food are supposed to be top of the range in that particular line and that is why I get my cat some of them each shop. He actually will eat them and so I save money in the long run because I don't have to throw any out. Another popular brand of cat biscuits of which where I once had a choice of 3 different flavours and now only has two flavours has risen in 2 weeks from $3.79 to $4.19.

There seems to be no rhyme or reason for price increases these days. Its pretty crook when the generic brand of an item will cost you more than the big name brands, I always thought generic was there to SAVE you money. Just what is really going on in our supermarkets? Well, as I'm having a whine about prices how about this. Meat in particular. A certain cut of meat was on special for a very good price BUT it was ONLY available at that price if you purchased it in the bulk pack.We have a lot of people here on the coast that live alone or in pairs who would love a bit of a change from the boring routine of chops, snags and tough steak which shrinks to billyo when you cook it to something a bit upmarket once in a while but like me cannot afford to pay nearly $30 a kilo under normal circumstances and who like me if they spot a good price will buy it and freeze it for a treat, Why am I being forced to buy in bulk much more than I need? Simple answer I don't buy it at all.

I would love to have a meal of Veal but I cannot afford the high prices. Don't believe me? Keep your dockets for 6 weeks then do a comparison on basic food items you buy every week/ fortnight, you will be amazed.
on 3 May, 2008 at 7:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I do nielsen homescan with every shop - so I have to notice the prices when I buy and when I scan them.

I get refunds just about every fortnight from wolllies currimundi because their prices on the docket don't match the prices on the shelf.
If I shop at coles or bi-lo I nearly always get a freebee from them because the prices are wrong.
on 3 May, 2008 at 8:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Funny how these scanners,
always scan the price up and not down!
on 4 May, 2008 at 8:06 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It seems the office of fair trading only has the guts to stand up to the little guy in the scanner checking. What about the big woolworths & Coles? How many of them have they fined. I can tell you now as soon as I have started to take notice of what price is on my docket, more I have noticed mistakes. Example Woolworths: Big sign saying 2 loaves of woolworths bread for $4 I grabed 2 loaves from the shelf where the sign was & was charged $4.50. There excuse was "oh but not those ones" I argued & got my 50 cents back, (petty I know) but we all have a story about being overcharged at supermarkets & the office of fair trading only pick on the little kids in the playground.
on 5 May, 2008 at 9:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
That seems like an exorbitant fine for a locally owned supermarket in a smaller town... and pretty unfair for a small business to have to absorb that!

Why not let them invest that amount in fixing that alleged problem in their own business, like better barcode scanners, training more younger staff etc.?

I'm sure that sort of cash would go a long way to helping with that.

Where does the fine money go anyhow???

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.