Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
3:32AM Saturday 26 July, 2008 Sunshine Coast weather Mostly sunny min 9° - max 20°

Coast missed out in budget, MPs say

The Sunshine Coast’s federal MPs say local residents were shortchanged in last night’s budget - see the budget details here.

Member for Fisher Peter Slipper and Member for Fairfax Alex Somlyay – both Liberal – accused treasurer Wayne Swan of providing only one of nine Coast election promises, and omitting $960 million in road upgrades promised last November.

While Mr Swan’s budget has provided tax cuts, subsidies for childcare, assistance for primary and high school students and help for first home buyers and struggling renters, they say very little of the big-picture funding will filter to the Coast.

Mr Slipper, called it a “Robin Hood” budget that harkened back to the class warfare notions of the 1890s.

“The Sunshine Coast missed out, mega,” he said.

“It does nothing to recognise that as a growing community we have a particular need for extra funding for infrastructure.”

He said while he had not looked at the fine print, he could see “no tangible evidence” Labor had fulfilled election promises to provide a $5 million upgrade for Stockland Park, a $1 million Mooloolaba Spit revitalisation, a $5 million Maroochydore-Sunshine Coast exhibition centre or the $1.3 million for Nambour CBD refurbishments.

“There is also nothing there to upgrade the Bruce Highway to six lanes from the Sunshine Coast to Brisbane,” he said.

“At this point in time the only election promise they appear to have funded is the $4.6 million water recycling demonstration project for Coolum.”

Mr Somlyay said not one cent had been provided for road projects.

“There is nothing in the budget to indicate an increase in road funding,” he said.

He said he was most worried by changes to the Medicare levy threshold, which would discourage young people from private health insurance and put pressure on Sunshine Coast public hospitals.

“I’m sure Mr Swan is glad he doesn’t still live in Nambour and has to rely on the services at the Nambour outpatients,” he said.

Opposition leader Brendan Nelson said the budget was not anti-inflationary and typically Labor, jacking up taxes for people it disliked.

Dr Nelson said government was budgeting for 134,000 people to lose their jobs over the next year.

“This is a typical high-taxing, high-spending budget, which targets people that it doesn’t like,” Dr Nelson told reporters.

The budget did nothing to help families struggling to pay their mortgages, feed their children and put petrol in their cars, he said.

Opposition treasury spokesman Malcolm Turnbull agreed. He said the budget as an economic con, a high taxing, high spending old-fashioned Labor budget. And new taxes to raise the cost of alcohol, cars, health insurance and energy would add to inflationary pressures.

Related:

> What's in the 2008 Budget for you

> Australian Government Budget website

> Seniors feel snubbed by Treasurer

> Swan's budget fails green test

KEY BUDGET POINTS

2008-09 Cash surplus - $21.7 billion (1.8 per cent of GDP)

GDP growth - 2.75 per cent

Current account deficit - 5 per cent of GDP

Unemployment - 4.25 per cent

Employment growth - 1.25 per cent

Wages growth - 4 per cent

Consumer price index - 3.25 per cent

Savings $33 billion over four years, including $7 billion in 2008-09.

TAX

Personal income tax to be reduced by $47 billion over four years.

From July 1, person on $48,000 a year to get a weekly tax cut of $20; person earning $14,000 or less to pay no tax.

Tax thresholds to rise - 30 per cent from $30,001 to $34,001, 40 per cent threshold from $75,0001 to $80,001, 45 per cent threshold from $150,001 to $180,001.

Medicare levy surcharge threshold to rise from $50,000 to $100,000 for singles, from $100,000 to $150,000 for couples.

Fringe benefits tax crackdown, to raise $1.4 billion over four years.

Tightening of tax rules on those who use laptops for personal more than work use.

FAMILY PAYMENTS

Family tax benefit to be means-tested, only available where main earner earns less than $150,000 a year. From July 2008.

Baby bonus to be means-tested from January 2009, so it will only go to families earning less than $150,000.

Tax rate on luxury cars to rise from 25 per cent to 33 per cent, from July 2008.

Tax increased on ready to drink alcohol.

Comprehensive review of tax system to the end of 2009, but there’ll be no change to the GST rate or tax-free super for those over 60.

THE FUTURE

New $20 billion building Australia fund to finance roads, rail, ports and broadband.

New $11 billion education investment fund to finance skills, TAFE colleges and universities.

New $10 billion health and hospitals fund to finance improvements to hospitals and health care.

Child care Child care tax rebate to rise from 30 per cent to 50 per cent; cap on rebate amount that can be paid to rise from $4,354 to $7,500 per child; child care tax rebate to be paid quarterly, instead of annually.

Baby bonus to rise to $5,000 from July 2008.

EDUCATION

New $11 billion education investment fund to finance skills, TAFE colleges and universities. 50 per cent tax refund on education expenses, to cost $4.4 billion over four years.

$1 million per school for computers.

All 4 year olds to get 15 hours a week, 40 weeks a year of early childhood education by 2013.

HEALTH

New $10 billion health and hospitals fund to pay for improvements to hospitals and health care.

Committing extra $3.2 billion over five years to public health.

Immediate injection of $1 billion to relieve pressure on public hospitals.

$10 billion health and hospitals fund set up for long-term funding of hospitals, technology and research.

$275 million for GP super clinics; $39 million to bring nurses back into the workforce.

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

$2.2 billion package, including saver accounts to help people save for first homes. First $5,000 of individual contributions in saver account to attract 17 per cent government contribution.

Rental affordability scheme to encourage building of 50,000 new rental properties by 2011-12, costing $623 million over four years.

SENIORS

Concession allowance up from $218 to $500; phone allowance up from $88 to $132 for those with internet; utilities allowance up from $107.20 to $500, to be paid quarterly.

CARERS

Lump sum payments of $1,000 to carer payment recipients, $600 to carer allowance recipients.

Expanding eligibility for carer payments.

Additional 19,000 carers of children with severe disability to be entitled to carer payment in 2009-10, costing $274 million over five years.

CLIMATE CHANGE

$2.3 billion over five years to cut greenhouse gas emissions $500 million over eight years for clean coal; $500 million over six years for renewable energy; $150 million over four years for energy innovation; loans of up to $10,000 to households to cut water and power use.

Public service 1,200 commonwealth public service jobs to be lost as part of 2 per cent “efficiency dividend”, saving $1.8 billion over five years.

REGIONAL

$2.2 billion over five years for caring for country program. $176 million over four years to improve infrastructure and services in regional Australia.

$271 million over four years to provide regional areas with metro-comparable broadband.

$130 million over four years to help farming adapt to climate change.

TRANSPORT

New $20 billion building Australia fund to finance roads, rail, ports and broadband.

$75 million feasibility study on high-priority transport projects.

INDIGENOUS

$90 million over five years for child and maternal services; 99 million over five years for extra teachers in the Northern Territory; $56 million over four years to expand literacy and numeracy programs.

BUSINESS

Begin to reduce withholding tax, cutting current interim rate of 30 per cent to final rate of 7.5 per cent for most non-resident investors.

DEFENCE

Defence budget to reach $22.66 billion in 2008-09; $1.04 billion for overseas operations.

Overseas development assistance to rise from $3.2 billion to $3.7 billion.

Email this story
Print this story

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 14 May, 2008 at 5:04 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
A bit rich coming from the conservative MPs, especially considering that the Howard government stands as the highest taxing Government since WWII. If you earn under $80000 a year the last Howard/Costello budget gave you a tax cut of $0, whilst giving away up to $38 per week to high income earners. Considering the low wages paid on the Coast, the majority of residents have gotten something, something more than the silver tails were offering.

The cut in for the Medicare Levy Surcharge (in reality a tax) has not moved since it was brought in. 11 years of inflation and it's sting that catches a lot of average Australians. What other private business is subsidised to the same level and has the government coercing the public to buy it's questionable services?

Most people who are forced in the private health insurance scam, would never use it. It's like forcing someone who sends their kids to Public schools to pay private school fees, the less well off subsidising the rich. Private health insurance has done nothing to relieve the pressure on the public system, if anything it's diverted public money to private profits. The budget should have scrapped all subsidises to the private health sector and put the money where it's needed and will be used, the public health system.

Looks like the local conservative MP's are crying because their business mates have missed out on some potential contracts and have to pay a bit more for their luxury cars, cry more. It's not a great or even good budget however it's better than the snouts in the trough rubbish the Howard years served up.
on 14 May, 2008 at 8:11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Well said Jason. What a ridiculous statement from Dr Nelson - “This is a typical high-taxing, high-spending budget, which targets people that it doesn’t like,”

I don't see anything wrong with the Robin Hood approach. To be honest, I would happily forego the tax cuts to that more can be put into health and education.
on 14 May, 2008 at 8:59 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ho..hum and the expected response from 'the other side'. This piece could have been written yesterday except for changing a few numbers. The opposition are in a no win situation after what I reckon is a pretty good first budget. They better watch out as their irrelevence becomes greater and greater as each day passes.
on 14 May, 2008 at 9:40 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
A question or two for Mr Slipper: why is it class warfare when the rich miss out on a tax cut but when the workers miss out (a la JWH in 07) it is not? Was not the loss of benefits under Work Choices class warfare?

We also need to understand the real meaning of the popular Liberal phrase, "the politics of envy" .

Because the Libs cannot imagine a world that does not operate on rabid self-interest and gross materialism they can only think that those who do not have a luxury car must be envious of those who do.
Therefore, if I choose to consume less for the betterment of the planet, for example, by driving a small 4 cylinder car, I must be thinking and acting irrationally.
I think I know who is living in the 1890's......
on 14 May, 2008 at 10:04 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I dont know why everyone seems to think it is hitting the rich. They have cut the child care rebate for families on over $110,000.

That is not a rich persons income, that is an average families income just to pay a mortgage and childcare with two full time jobs. WOW! What is the use in working hard if such a large slice is going to go to childcare?....because if we dont we will lose what we have worked so hard to get...like the house.

Where is the incentive to get ahead?
on 14 May, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
These Sheriffs of Nottingham still don't get it, even after the federal election mandate has led to some sort of redistribution providing much needed relief.

Slipper & Somlyay like John Howard are yesterday's men, trapped in some sort of pre 80's era.

Personally I see "no tangible evidence” of any intelligence on Mr. Slipper's behalf in wanting a six lane highway linking the Sunshine Coast to 3 Million people less than 1 hour away; despite the resounding non-development vote in the local area election. What is even more amazing is that he then rants on about the state of our public hospital when it is clear to all that neither federal members would use it, and in any case what has been their remarkable contribution to lift our hospitals in the past decade if he was so unhappy about this.

As for the election promises it is early days yet to be mean and tricky in saying "no tangible evidence".

Most pundits would assume that Kevin 07 has a longer more sustainable view.

He doesn't seem to be type to play the
"NON-CORE PROMISE" card.

Yet another DAILY fair and balanced article bearing a title straight out of a politicians mouth. This one could be a candidate for Media watch, or was there any tangible evidence of lazy journalism?

Sensational.

Ed: The headline of the article accurately reflects what the Coast MPs quoted in the story are saying - ie, that very little of the "big-picture" funding will filter through to the Coast. To repeat Mr Slipper's quote: “The Sunshine Coast missed out, mega.”
on 14 May, 2008 at 11:28 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I like the fact that you have again repeated a quote that sounds like it has come out of the mouth of a 16 year old.

If "mega" is as insightful as Mr Slipper (he is not worth the tag MP) is able to be on something as important to the country as a budget. What hope do we have of any adequate representation in the next few years.

Retire like your fellow dinosaurs are doing and give us the benefit of a by-election
on 14 May, 2008 at 12:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm sorry Chrissie, but there are not too many 'average' families on $110,000, try $70,000 to $90,000.

And funnily enough, these people are also working very hard to try and get ahead. People are so out of touch.
on 14 May, 2008 at 12:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I too think the Daily Journos are getting lazy and the Editorial staff continue to show their Conservative bias.

“There is also nothing there to upgrade the Bruce Highway to six lanes from the Sunshine Coast to Brisbane,” Mr Slipper said.
Why wasn’t he then asked, “Isn’t this the same Mr Slipper who failed in Gov. over the past 10 years to deliver this 6 lane highway. Wasn’t the best he could promise was that it would be delivered by 2015?”

Also why is there no Journo/s name to this article?

In closing why is it that the Sunshine Coast Daily is one of the few APN papers to NOT have the name of the Editor attached to the Daily Editiorial piece?

Dick Stevenson on Buderim.

Ed: The Daily endeavours to provide as balanced a view as possible on all issues that it covers, but when we are working to deadline it is not always possible to canvass every view or to cover every possible angle of a story in one addition. The journalist's name was not omitted from the article intentionally and has now been added. We currently also have stories on the website quoting Mr Rudd and Mr Swan giving their views on the budget, which defies the claim of conservative bias.

You will find many newspapers don't have the name of the editor attached to the editorial piece.
on 14 May, 2008 at 12:20 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Jason, I agree with most of what you say but draw the line at simply diverting money into public health.

I have a direct issue with spending more money on Public Health without fixing it first. Pouring more money into a dis-functional system does not fix the problem.

If bearucratic processes are not rationalised / improved then we have just wasted more money on non 'patient care personnel'.

We apply the same logic to Local Government for services, why not Health and Education?

I have met many private health specialists over many years who refuse to donate (free) their time to the public health system anymore because it is run by idiots following ridiculous processes and procedures.

While we are on the subject, why don't we get an update from Captain Bligh on how many non patient care workers we now have in Qld Health. After all, we were told years ago by Premier Pete that he was going to slash the numbers - I bet my bottom dollar this has not occurred and if the new figures do show a reduction, it is the spin doctors at work again.

Sorry for being such a sceptic but I am a public servant and hear the crap every day.
on 14 May, 2008 at 12:23 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ed. if the MP said "Kevin Rudd is Tin Tin's love child" would you then accurately reflect that as a headline?

I doubt it.

We may have missed out (and I emphasise the word MAY) on those initiatives, however the article then points out massive funding to public infrastructure which as been sorely neglected for over a decade.

We could have a prolonged debate over why as your article pointed out "New $20 billion building Australia fund to finance roads, rail, ports and broadband.

New $11 billion education investment fund to finance skills, TAFE colleges and universities.

New $10 billion health and hospitals fund to finance improvements to hospitals and health care.

Child care Child care tax rebate to rise from 30 per cent to 50 per cent; cap on rebate amount that can be paid to rise from $4,354 to $7,500 per child; child care tax rebate to be paid quarterly, instead of annually." if we have missed out mega ?

You're drawing a long bow there.

If any one could tell me how the Spit revitalisation, upgrading a sporting field, Building an Entertainment complex or tarting up Nambour is a priority over health, education and basic modern infrastructure then I'm all ears.

I'm also interested to know how the conclusion was made " that we aren't included in the big picture funding" ?

Alternatively if it can be conclusively proven that those were indeed core promises or they have indeed been broken then I'd be prepared to ex-communicate Kevvie and Wayne as Sunshine Coast lads.

After looking at it in Totality, it looks like the best budget we've had in years.

Ed: The Daily's journalists are today looking in more detail at exactly how the budget will affect projects/initiatives on the Coast.
on 14 May, 2008 at 12:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The more I read about the budget, the more I'm starting to feel totally screwed over.

With, as I understand it, measures in place to prevent a person offsetting any investment losses against your taxable income, with regards to determining you eligibility for Childcare rebate, it basically means that anyone actually trying to get ahead, rather than mooching off the State is getting screwed.

The bludgers get it all, and the ones who work to try and create a future for their families are getting slugged in the nads.

Well done Rudd. Well done Swan. The 'middle-income' families that needed your help the most - and voted your slack asses in - just got a kick where it hurts.
on 14 May, 2008 at 1:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
From the sounds of it - 'useyourhead' you didn't vote them in at all - bitter at the world hey??? Anyone who says working families with children aren't being looked after has fun with the truth is all I can say.
on 14 May, 2008 at 8:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
sorry jane, most of the double income families i know are bringing in about $110K. That is only $55k a parent and any teacher, professional or editor for that matter gets that much per annum, not to mention they usually have mortgages as well. Not everyone is below $50K a year..and please dont suggest i am out of touch..my family is lucky to get $30K (courtesy of my son)as a single parent but i can still recognize unfairness when i see it. I was a double income family once that use to pay childcare. Maybe when they fix the waiting lists in hospital that i have been on for over a year i may be able to get the operation so i can work too. Please be careful who you think is not stuggling or is not in touch.
on 15 May, 2008 at 10:18 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
This is a complete nonsense (or, for Slipper's benefit and mega-nonsence). Labour candidates stood for election in these two seats. They made election promises. The electorate rejected these promises by not voting for the Labour candidate. These election promises were extinguished one vote at a time by the electorate.

Slipper and Somlyay have to stop being lazy and go and get these things if their electorate want or need them. They will have to work for their keep. No more relaxing in the back benches occasionally mumbling along with their front bench. No more Howard wandering by with a bit of money to keep their electorate on side.

There is no money train anymore so they have to find someone to blame... someone that isn't the electorate.
on 15 May, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Sorry Chrissie, your comments still indicate you are out of touch. There is absolutely no reason, if people live within their means, that they can't afford what they need. Comments such as 'only $55k a parent' indicates that you are out of touch - this is above the average wage for goodness sake.

I fixed the waiting list by paying for my operation and not putting extra, unnecessary strain on the public system. Truly, people are of the mentality that they 'deserve' much more than they actually do. People have to take responsibility somewhere surely??
on 15 May, 2008 at 2:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
jane, I am sorry dear...figures released today state the average wage in Australia is $1,100 per week. Now if you have a calculator you will be able to see that equates to $57,200 per year and then if you times that by two...guess what ..you have $114,400 dollars per annum. Mmmm who is out of touch.

As for paying for major back surgery, well obviously you have a lot more money than me, so what in the world are you complaining about
on 16 May, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
As per previous emails - I am not the one complaining Chrissie, that would be you. There's that responsibility thing again. Obviously we have to agree to disagree. I don't know where you're getting your stats from but we can all make stats work to suit our argument and I guess that's what you're choosing to do. By the way, I'm not your dear.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.