12:00a.m. 20th May 2008
Councillor Debbie Blumel with Sustainable Urban Development and Technology's Justin Holbrook both say houses are a great source of catching water. Photo: Cade Mooney/174759
A Sunshine Coast project which received $4.6 million in the federal budget may see new subdivisions in high rainfall areas become the dams of the future.
The funding announced on Tuesday will develop technology to allow rainwater harvested from the roofs of the planned 1300-home Coolum Ridges estate to be fed back into the Sunshine Coast regional council drinking water reticulation system.
The concept of the urban dam was developed by Justin Holbrook of Sunshine Coast company Sustainable Urban Development and Technology, who said this week the Coolum project would demonstrate a smarter alternative to the big pipe Brisbane water solutions now being put in place.
“Most urban development is on the coast where most areas of high rainfall are,’’ he said.
While he concedes some areas of Queensland need big infrastructure solutions that was not the case in areas of high rainfall.
“It’s designed as climate change adaptive urban development,’’ he said of Coolum Ridges which will also recycle treated waste water for re-use in toilets and irrigation.
“This is leading edge stuff that puts the Coast on the map for sustainable technology.”
Water collected from roofs will be piped to centralised tanks where it will be treated and disinfected before being fed into the council system.
Waste water will be treated and returned to homes via separate pipes for re-use in toilets and gardens. It is estimated the estate will be 75 per cent self sufficient in its water needs.
Sunshine Coast councillor Debbie Blumel, who pushed the funding application to Kevin Rudd while she was running for a federal seat at the last election, agrees.
Ms Blumel said the project would demonstrate what could be done.
“I’d like to see it given every opportunity to become the standard for new development,’’ she said.
“This is a pilot project to learn from and which could be replicated in other areas of similar rainfall.’’
Describing the state government’s Traveston Dam proposal as “small box thinking” Ms Blumel said climate change was now a mainstream issue that needed to be addressed.
She said the federal government’s support showed its willingness to address climate change at a local level.
“The community has already shown a willingness to cut water use and to use it more wisely.
“This technology will enable us to do that at a local level,’’ Ms Blumel said.
The project, which will be underwritten by the developer FKP, still requires the backing of the Sunshine Coast Council and the state government.
Recent Comments
Careful you lot. We need this infrastructure so that we can supply more water to SEQ and somebody is going to pay for it! If we use less water, how are we going to pay for the infrastructure to supply the extra water which we are going to need ? Um...No that's not right. Let me start again.
We need more water because we need more people to move to SEQ so that we can afford to pay for the infrastructure and have the skilled workforce to support the expected boom in population in SEQ - Yes that's sounding better.
So just don't you people start talking about saving water. Where is your Community spirit.
The positive news behind the water conservation experiment is that once again we have a new councillor in Debbie Blumel who is delivering on pre-election promises. The cynics and negative thinkers declared there was nothing in the budget for the Sunshine Coast? I don't think so. Brighten up, be positive, and let's get on with it.
The State Government used All of the State's funds to build the Wivenhoe Dam, then so many years later sold a large percentage of the resource to the Brisbane Council, at Cost, not at Market Value.
Yes, I see where you are coming from, Consumer uses less, cost of water and all that goes with it costs more. Same reasoning why our Duaringa Shire told us to get rid of our Rain Water Tanks back in the 1980s. Now Rain Water Tanks are popular again, our air is so thick with coal dust the filters would cost a mint, to make it drinkable.
Yes, the Sunshine Coast enjoys ample rainfall, and possibly the population can enjoy more water use per head than Brisbane and District. So many workers compute daily to Brisbane and back, so why not transfer some of those businesses to the Sunshine Coast, instead of the Capital hogging the lot. Makes more sense defence wise too, if you know what I mean.
I like the idea and I also agree with Flashnik in that the overflow from the tank goes into the reservoir.
I might be jumping the gun here but can we take what we learn here and apply those learnings to retrofitting existing communities?
Maybe we could divert the Traveston Dam funds to apply the retrofit?
'Viva la revolution'
Finally, in Debbie Blumel & Kevin Rudd, we have people in positions of influence who understand.
Debbie appears to be able to work with Developers and Government to get better outcomes. And Kevin has delivered on his election promise, and is being innovative, thinking outside the square.
There's no point building dams in dust bowls to provide water for towns hundreds of kilometres away, especially when they live where the rain falls!
Harvesting rainwater and stormwater not only makes sense, it is also greenhouse friendly, and reduces adverse impacts downstream of developments.
Ours is the driest continent on Earth, and getting drier. We need new solutions, not more empty dams.
With the cost of town water rising and rationing routine, houses, subdivisions and towns that are largely independent of town water will be far more valuable.
It sure beats touting the mid-twentieth century love of concrete and scale, technology of dams as the best solution to our water crisis. It's only a crisis because we've been so short-sighted as to allow ourselves to become so totally reliant on dams. (With wonderful exceptions like Mapleton, I have to admit, Rangeman)
The point about residential settlements mostly being in areas of highest rainfalls isn't unique to the coast... our state capital fits that bill too.
This is what we need in our "Smart State" rather than a decision that is just a throwback to fifties technology when a new dam always went down well with the voters.
Need to dam good agricultural land, bugger a river? Hell no, let's be smarter.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again