Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
10:15AM Friday 17 July, 2009

Honeymoon becomes nightmare

Honeymoon becomes nightmare

Boaz and Carley Dickson. Photo: 179531

A newlywed couple’s memories of a dream honeymoon in Vietnam have been ruined after an airline lost their luggage only to eventually return it almost a month later with the contents destroyed and anything of value missing.

Nambour’s Boaz Dickson and Carley Langford said their I dos on October 11 before setting off to Vietnam for a honeymoon filled with relaxation and adventure.

Bad weather saw them decide to head home early and they booked a flight with Jetstar Pacific to take them from Danang to Ho Chin Minh City where they would catch their flight home, because they believed the airline to be an Australian company.

Jetstar Pacific is actually a Vietnamese low fares airline in which the Qantas group owns an 18% share.

When Carley and Boaz arrived in Ho Chin Minh City for their Australian flight they discovered their bags had not made the trip with them.

They were advised to fill out forms reporting the loss of their bags and it would be sent on to them in Australia.

Arriving in Brisbane on October 26, the couple were told by a Qantas employee their luggage would be returned to them in three days.

Because the luggage contained antique jewellery Carley had worn to the wedding and Boaz’s wedding ring, the couple checked again with Jetstar two days later on the progress of their luggage and were surprised to hear there was no record of their luggage having been lost.

After many more phone calls the couple were told their luggage had been involved in a fire and destroyed. They were later told their bags had suffered only water damage.

Earlier this week their battered and worn bags turned up at the Maroochydore airport. However, everything inside the luggage had been completely destroyed by mould. What wasn’t destroyed was missing – including Carley’s antique jewellery, the couple’s cameras and Boaz’s wedding ring.

Now they want answers.

“We went straight on the honeymoon after our wedding night which is why we had Carley’s jewellery on us,” Boaz said.

“Everything is lost or destroyed. Everything. Between us we estimate we have had $12,000 worth of stuff stolen or lost.

“They have offered us $500 compensation for 32kgs of luggage which they said would be put on our credit card last week. It is still not there.

A Jetstar spokeswoman said the couple’s bags had been stored in a section of the Ho Chi Minh City’s domestic terminal which had been damaged by fire. That part of the airport was shut down while Vietnamese officials carried out their investigations.

“Jetstar Pacific sincerely regrets the loss of any personal belongings,” she said. “At no time did Jetstar Pacific staff have access to the area where the baggage had been kept as it had been closed off by airport authority and police.”

She said compensation had been paid to the couple’s credit card and a full explanation and apology would be sent to Carley and Boaz.

The couple said they expect the saga to continue .

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 21 November, 2008 at 1:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Even before I read the article I thought to myself. "sounds like the work of Jetstar!" And surprise surprise. I love how Qantas made the point of saying they only own 18% of the airline, yet they are the ones this poor couple had to go through. I just hope the rest of their marrige goes far better than the start!
on 21 November, 2008 at 5:52 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Another painful reminder to never put anything valuable in your checked luggage-especially jewelery and cameras.Also read the fine print on lost baggage and then take out adequate travel insurance.
on 21 November, 2008 at 6:14 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
hmm missing and stolen huh? which goes to show a leopard doesnt change its spots. Didn't trust them then, don't trust them now
on 21 November, 2008 at 7:32 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Newsbog - are you talking about the VC or Jetstar?
on 21 November, 2008 at 7:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
any decent travel insurance policy should cover the missing items. as they say, "if you can't afford the insurance, you can't afford to go".
on 21 November, 2008 at 9:09 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Did they not have adequate travel insurance? while it is entirely understandable that antiques or heirlooms cannot be replace a monetary amount could be paid had the appropriate insurance been arranged.. after all that is what insurance is for isn't it?
on 21 November, 2008 at 11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
While baggade insurence is a good idea they probably didnt see it as necessary they were oversea's for a short stay they didnt think all their belongings would be ruined, out of everyone on the flight it happened to them, im actually interested to find out whether this did happen to anyone else on the same flight, none the less i hate it when i fly and they loose or "misplace" my baggage i went to sydney from the sunshine coast a 1 hr and 20 min flight and they still managaed to sent my bag's to camberra, i orded them to send a courier to my parents house and drop it off.
on 21 November, 2008 at 11:19 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Travel insurance isn't just essential for baggage - it's for medical cover etc.
If you have ever stayed in an asian hospital you might it's "necessary"... it could have been a lot worse than missing luggage.
on 21 November, 2008 at 11:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Going overseas for one day or one month, doesn't matter.
Had they taken out adequate travel insurance this wouldn't even be a news story.
You can never be over insured, espcialy if not in your own country
on 21 November, 2008 at 3:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Why didn't they take the jewellery, camera and any irreplaceable valuables on board with them? Everything else can be replaced by insurance. Lesson learnt...
on 21 November, 2008 at 5:56 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I know this young couple and they did have adequate insurance the only problem is the insurers are not willing to pay due to the 'suspicious' circumstances of ther loss and the multiple times the airline changed it's story. Instead of wedding gifts they were given money for the cost of the honeymoon and invested in many items, so they could have many happy memories of their stay. Didn't quick work out like that though.
on 21 November, 2008 at 7:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
When I get on a plane I take any valuables on with me, not leave someone else to "take care" of them.
on 21 November, 2008 at 9:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
coastlovers, if the couple concerned were given money as gifts towards the cost of the honeymoon, how on earth could they be out of pocket $12,000 in luggage?
Unless they dress exclusively in louis vuitton and prada, and gathering by the attached pics this seems not to be the case, I cannot fathom how the monetary value could be so high.
Proper insurance would cover this sort of thing irrespective of the story changes you mentioned.
on 22 November, 2008 at 9:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
not taking valuables as carry on luggage,DUMB.not wearing wedding ring,DUMB.not having proper insurance cover,DUMB.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.