Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
2:29AM Tuesday 02 December, 2008

Coast water restrictions in the pipeline

Coast water restrictions in the pipeline

Queensland Water Commission chair Elizabeth Nosworthy talks to Sunshine Coast Regional Council mayor Bob Abbot at Nambour. Photo: Nicholas Falconer/ 178781

The Sunshine Coast will have to endure tougher water restrictions when its water is siphoned off next year to prop up the rest of the region.

The Coast, which currently has plenty of water and is on minimum restrictions, will be placed on medium restrictions from March 30 next year to help ease the pain in other parts of the region

Water will be redirected through the $9 billion water grid.

Sunshine Coast Regional Council mayor Bob Abbot was told about the plan when he met Queensland water commission chairwoman Elizabeth Nosworthy in Nambour.

Mr Abbot said he had sought and been given an assurance no water would be taken until he had a written guarantee the Coast would get it back if required.

“I’m not agreeing to anything until we have an agreement guaranteeing the Sunshine Coast’s water supply,” he said.

“The bottom line is I at least want a guarantee that there’ll be a pipeline headed north if we get into trouble.”

Ms Nosworthy said the Coast would be looked after if it needed more water.

“I’m very confident I will come back with the assurances Mr Abbott is looking for,” she said.

Ms Nosworthy admitted there was no way at this stage to redirect water to the Coast but said the grid, which is currently under construction, guaranteed water security for Coast residents.

The Coast, she said, had to share the burden.

“Medium water restrictions are a first step to bringing the Sunshine Coast in line with the rest of the south-east,” she said.

Water restrictions for businesses will be phased in gradually from March 30 and businesses will have to take active steps to become water efficient and reduce water use.

Businesses that use more than 10 million litres of water a annum will be required to submit a water efficiency management plan for council approval.

The plan must demonstrate how the business will reduce water use by 25% or achieve best practice water use.

Residents can use a single hand-held hose – with twist-trigger nozzle – between 4pm and 4.30pm on Saturday and Tuesday for odd numbered houses.

For even and un-numbered homes it is 4pm to 4.30pm on Sunday and Wednesday.

An efficient irrigation system or sprinkler can be used instead of a hose to water gardens.

Cars can be washed during the approved hours but lawns cannot be watered.

Bucket watering of gardens can take place on any day between 4pm and 8am.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 10 October, 2008 at 5:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
So on the one hand this thief from Brisbane details a guarantee of water security for the coast, then admits there is no way of sending water back this way.

Sounds like the only guarantee here is that the coast is going to be made to suffer just like Brisbane even though we have adequate resources to cater for our own needs.
Who is going to police these new restriction or will we be required to dob in our neighbours?
on 10 October, 2008 at 5:55 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Anna Bligh and her ` water mate ' Nosworthy just might end up having the biggest Mutiny by a Community in this State - - maybe one to rival the `Shearer's Strike in Barcaldine ' over a Century ago , if the Water Pipeline does not immediately become a 2 way reverse action pipeline .


Don't think Nosworthy that it's beyond some in this Community to take on the role of a French Resistance WW2 type action on this pipeline .

We planned our Water Supply properly unlike Brisbane State Politicians who put dams in the wrong areas. Hence favours to mates was never the best way to plan present and future water supply or any other major infrastructure for this State .

And will M/S Nosworthy try and hide behind a Pillar outside a Building as she has done previously to avoid being interviewed by the Media ?

However Anna and her ' Mate ' are up against Big Bob and this Community and they haven't really seen us in Action yet !
on 10 October, 2008 at 6:13 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
When I look at the wider picture, this state especially here in the S.E corner is in trouble and set to get worse. Now the residents of the Sunshine Coast are to experience water restrictions and to a degree isn't fair. However, it's all about supplying Brisbane with water to meet the population explosion which shows no sign of slowing. We even have the Lord Mayor of the Brisbane City Council fast-tracking reforms to the property development application process thus allowing for another 140 to 170,000 new dwellings by 2026. The Water Commission is an interesting structure and one that needs to be reviewed, hopefully by a LNP government. Now the people of the Sunshine Coast are going to have a taste of water restrictions. Bob Abbot on behalf of his council is right to seek an assurance but again, this ALP government does have the controls. The Bligh Government doesn't another term in office
on 10 October, 2008 at 6:15 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I WAS RECENTLY informed while doing a plumbing course in brisvegas that the reason there is a problem with the water, up to 1/3 of there usage is lost in the ground due to unmaintained mains, they only find these leaks accidently when doing roadworks. This is why they have reduced the water pressure to 250kpa not as much wastage but the same percentage lost. Firebrigade werent happy they need pressure to do there job. Govt, wont fix it because you cant see it, millions spent on something you cant see, not like a bridge, no water no life, who then needs a bridge. Maybe there water consumption should be reviewed ! Maybe they are wasting it, and they have there share already.
on 10 October, 2008 at 6:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Good point Matthew1 wonder how much to fix all those leaky pipes?? then compare the costs already spent and predicted to be spent on Traveston.
Pressure needs to be brought to bear in this area.
on 10 October, 2008 at 6:47 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
What arrogance! How dare Anna Bligh suggest (as she did on TV last night) that we squander our water reources! They are the ones squandering the TOTAL resources of the State including the massive GST windfall they are receiving. The sooner they go the better.
on 10 October, 2008 at 6:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
we(on the sunshine coast) are to go on water restrictions in march so that brisbane has adequate water and if the sunshine coast runs out of water then too bad because the pipe is only one way to brisbane.... i dont really have a problem sharing but i want adequate recompense this.. is a user pays society so brisbane should pay... i have written twice to the state government and received no answers or even a suitable reply....sunshine coast residents are water wise and observe water saving techniques without restrictions being put upon us...but stealing is stealing and the queensland government have done nothing but bully the sunshine coast residents.. its disgraceful....mary bruce
on 10 October, 2008 at 7:13 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Wow I hear alot of quotes about how brisbane should have put there dams in the right place, and that the NLP will do a better job.
Im not to sure if anyone knows this but it was the Nationals that built those dams that dont work. Also what is the opisitions policy on anything? Can someone tell me. All I have hard them say is we wont build the trav dam and we will de-almigate the councils. Does the opisition even have any policies at the moment? I still find it hard to see how we can be angry with labor when the sunshine coast has been in the hands of the national and librals for the last 10 years on a state and federal level.
Am I missing something here?
on 10 October, 2008 at 7:23 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
From what I believe, previous Maroochy Shire home owners paid generous water rates to the council for the Council to plan and maintain a water system that would provide plentiful water. Are the rate payers going to be compensated for aiding the forethought of the previous MSC for comfortable water useage for it's residents?

Brisbane Council had adequate warning that their water supply system wasn't good enough. Yet they waited until the last moments to instigate water saving devices and programs for the area.

We're in the previous Caloundra Shire, and just by buying a front loader washing machine and, although we weren't water wasters to start with, just became more careful...we've managed to cut our water useage from an average 1500 litres per day to 550 litres per day. We have a young family, pets, swimming pool and two cars and we didn't even feel we were 'going without' to achieve the 550 litres per day.

Granted though, we do seem to receive more rain here but perhaps by planting more trees instead of continually cutting them down in the Brisbane area, they might attract more rain.
on 10 October, 2008 at 7:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
More dictatorship by an inept government
on 10 October, 2008 at 7:35 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
News_Watcher, it's good you draw attention to the activity of the current LNP Mayor of Brisbane, using rate payer funds to place BCC staff in State government departments so that development applications are fast tracked. The LNP in action, looking after the interests of political donors.

The pipeline needs to be two way and the last thing QLD needs is a government of moneyed elites hiding behind graffiti whilst they look after their mates. Whilst Labor is bad the LNP are a nightmare.
on 10 October, 2008 at 7:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I for one will water my gardens when ever I want too. Why, instead of wasting money on pipelines and new dams, the government doesn't put that money into buying tanks for SE Queenslanders? And I don't mean the tank rebate they have in place now. The rebate only covers the tank not the plumber and the rest. How many complete and set up tanks could millions buy? Or if there isn't enough water in Brisbane send the tanks our way then take our water.
on 10 October, 2008 at 8:09 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
For anyone wanting some of the history of the water issues in SEQ, I *strongly* urge you to read the article by Professor Peter Spearritt of UQ "The Water Crisis in South East Queensland" http://epress.anu.edu.au/troubled_waters...
or download the entire book from http://epress.anu.edu.au/troubled_waters...
on 10 October, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Re Elizabeth Nosworthy and Anna Bligh , ''Where beauty is skin deep, ugly goes down to the bone ''. Two cases where a book can be judged by it's cover !
on 10 October, 2008 at 8:39 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
They can take but can't give back. Take too much, then what. I'm afraid that the Coast will have water restrictions for the rest of time now, all for a place which dam levels are regularly high. Brilliant!!!!!!!
on 10 October, 2008 at 8:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The reason we are being well and truly screwed is because the govn has no power base on the SSC. . We need to fight to make them listen Bob Why not invite the two fat cats up here and let them see first hand how we feel!!!!!!!!!!!!
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:07 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
weigh up the pros and cons of getting rid of the labor government.....We need the Traveston Dam more than ever now and to de-amalgamate the Sunshine Coast Council would be bordering on criminal....finally the money wasting independant councils have been abolished in favour of a hopefully well run one for all and all for one council... Bob and his troops must negociate an eqitable plan to protect our water and a one way pipe to Brisbane is certainly not the answer....Stick to your guns Bob....But people I detest the policies of the Labor that we have right now..but if we elect the opposition you will be in the shocking position of "NO" Traveston Dam to drought proof the coast and the absolute circus of de-amalgamation of our new more effective Sunshine Coast Council.....Please look at the big picture before getting carried away with the emotion....And "NO"I am not a Labor voter but the opposition have got it so wrong this time.
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I find it interesting that the person running this project is or has been a board member and/or chairperson of at least 3 companies which have crashed and burned over the past year. Comforting thought!
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:19 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
any constitutional lawyers out there?? what's the procedure for seceding?
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:24 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Tom, I am sure the "one-way pipe to Brisbane" is certainly the answer if you live in Brisbane.

I am not sure what the council de-amalgamation issue has to do with our induced water problem though.

I do have to wonder about the lack of serious action to fix Brisbane's leaking water pipes as raised by matthew1 above. I guess it is cheaper economically and politically for the ALP Government to just take it from the Sunshine Coast.
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It is enough that the grid can be retrofitted to operate in both directions. The first priority has to be to get it operational to work in the direction it is needed now.
on 10 October, 2008 at 10 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
No, I am not going to practice water saving anymore than I do now. What I am doing is working as our dams are still full. What I would like to see is the incompetents currently running (or is that ruining) Qld to just stop bullying and stealing right now. FIX THE LEAKING PIPES, then come talk to us! Frankly Anna, I would rather see your government desicate and blow away, than give away our well planned water.
Don't think Traveston will help either, no responsible person would ever approve it. Everyone knows you are just trying to con the voters in Brisbane. More fool them if they don't know the facts - Treveston will not save them!
on 10 October, 2008 at 10:34 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ed, Whilst everyone knows that we are in a user pays environment, the position of the Queensland government is clear. This is continuing with their policy of mass populating areas that have reached their capacity. We know that the government does have the final say and numbers in the Queensland Parliament to get their own way. Yes, I would like to see the LNP given a chance to undo some of the damage that's been inflicted upon the people of this state.
on 10 October, 2008 at 10:44 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Here are a few other things to think about. Even though in water level percentages the sunshine coast looks good, if you make a comparison between the Coast and Brisbane, re: population versus available capacity of water, there is actually very little, to no difference. Basically they have as much water as the Sunshine coast per head of population.
A couple of the smaller dams on the coast are actually very shallow, and that is a high contributing factor as why they look so full.

However, having said that, I don’t mind sharing SOME water. I would be wrapped if the mayor could broker a deal to only allow Brisbane to take the current rain fall rate, IF we were 80% capacity or more. This would allow us to share, but not at our expense.
on 10 October, 2008 at 11:26 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm with the "I won't be changing my habits" crowd. My household is very water conscious and conservative - we won't be going without just so Bligh can try to buy Brisbane votes !

I like the questions raised regarding the "user pays" philosophy ... but didn't we get screwed with our rates increases to make up for the 'lack of adequate funding' from the government ?

Furthermore, Nosworthy (between bites) says that the need is greater in Brisbane because of their "population explosion" - has she seen the SUNSHINE Coast in the last decade ? (no, its the beachy thing ABOVE Brisbane on your map !)

This same governemtn is also propsing fast-tracking new residential developments to accomodate how many tens of thousands of people ? Yet stealing our water at the same time ? Um, can anybody else see a problem in that ?
on 10 October, 2008 at 1:13 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Besides, a "guarantee" from Nosworthy (or Bligh for that matter) is worth NOTHING.

Perhaps he'd be better off pressing Mark McArdle and Lawrence Springborg for a resolution ???
on 10 October, 2008 at 1:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
People, I will go to jail before paying a water restriction fine. I refuse to pay for Jim Soorley's (xBCC Mayor) and Pete Beatties hatred for each other to culminate in illegal consequences and fines on me.

The water wastage underground has been known for well over a decade in Brisbane. Budgetary financial models proving that action was required to rectify the underground wasteage prepared and presented to Brisbane Council only to fall on deaf ears. Beattie even refused to allow State govnt employees to attend water planning meetings with Brisbane Council employees.

The whole sordid story is digesting. I would rather break Beatties jaw than accept an apology from him.

A dam up here is not the issue - it is the political decision to locate it at Traveston. Technically, the current location is as flawed as the current Brisbane dams.

Tanks are more sustainable than dams. Traveston Dam alone will cost $2.5b - $1.8b for current construction and $700m to relocate infrastructure - highway, roads, electricity, pipes etc. $2.5b equates to over $7,000 / house in SEQ for a water tank. But the government can't sell off tanks but it can sell off a Water grid (dam) to private enterprise. So much for a Labor govnt.

I hope that the credit crisis escalates into a full blown depression so that the apathetic majority of Australians will be forced to stand up and say to the politicians and beaurecrats enough is enough.

Viva la Revolution
on 10 October, 2008 at 2:23 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Thank you for reminding me . I forgot the water grid was going to be privatised by our Socialist Government . George Orwell must be spinning in his grave !
on 10 October, 2008 at 2:52 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Maybe its time for south east queensland to almagate into one city instead of pretending where different places that dont have anything to do with each other...
on 10 October, 2008 at 5 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
This issue is of grave concern to me. Without the pipeline, the Sunshine Coast has an envisaged 12-15 year supply of water. With the Northern interconnector pipeline and Brisbane’s sizeable water demands, this will virtually immediately wipe out a decade’s capacity out of the Sunshine Coast system, and this will mean we will share the cost of the most expensive urban supply in Australia with a lower level of security and water restrictions.

I started writing on this issue to the Minister in February this year on behalf of potentially affected businesses with numerous follow up letters, only receiving a letter from his adviser five months later which did not answer the information I had requested.

There are small businesses who use water as part of their operations who potentially face increased costs to comply with these new restrictions. How useless is the current Government if they can’t even address the basic concerns of people who are going to have to pay for their ineptitude. I’m angry about this because their laziness and disregard for Coast residents and businesses is costing us.

In response, earlier this year I released on behalf of the LNP an alternative plan which would give the Sunshine Coast and South East Queensland a secure water supply, without the NPI-2 or Traveston Dam. You can read this online at www.climateproof.com.au.

Fiona Simpson - Member for Maroochydore
on 10 October, 2008 at 9:55 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Implementing the Water Innovation Fund to financially assist
businesses, community groups and large residential developments in
harvesting rain and stormwater

New technologies and incentives to help households maximise
their rainwater catchment, with ongoing rebates for water tanks and
water saving devices

A desalination plant at Bribie Island

Directing recycled water to power stations, industry and
agriculture, not into drinking supplies

Abandoning plans for Traveston Crossing Dam and its dependant
Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2

This is the plan?
That isnt exactly anything new, infact that is alot less than the current government is doing. Infact as the sitty member for the erea for a very decent amount of time how come your elected area is one of the worst places for infustructure in australia?
Instead of playing pollitics why not offer real alternatives and solutions, what are your plans for public transport for instance, please dont say more buses they have clearly failed there job. Infact please tell me what are your parties real policies?
saying your not doing something the Labor party has planned isnt a policy.
on 10 October, 2008 at 10:12 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
FiFi might have a bit more cred if she was to post this on a Brisbane media site. We haven't heard much from her lately, making it easy to forget that we have an Alaska Barbie of our own right here on the Coast.
on 11 October, 2008 at 7:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Agree, Viva la Revolution. On one hand with Labor we have a water grid, unwanted expensive dam and various desalination plants. With the other conservative party, a costly (financially and environmentally) desalination plant, and an expensive promise to undermine any responsible action on recycling water.

Both parties are promising big centralised solutions that can easily be sold as a private monopoly. No doubt the LNP not to be out done by Labor will flog it all off at the first opportunity.

The LNP promise to continue assistance with rainwater tanks is commendable but falls far short on the commonsense offered by the Greens. The cheapest option that should be in the mix of solutions is to mandate the use of rainwater tanks as the Greens are proposing:

http://qld.greens.org.au/policies/Qld-po...
on 11 October, 2008 at 9:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If only labor hadn't been so greedy and put in those dams on the gold coast, brisbane wouldn't be in so much strife and having to take the sunshine coasts water... but i guess thats life considering the same land that wasn't allowed to be put for water catchment is now pretty much all developed...
on 12 October, 2008 at 12:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
State Government assurances on this are worth nothing. And will be worth nothing until there is capacity to do what they assure.

While there is probably no real alternative, the situation is made more offensive by the pathetic and self indulgent posturing of the Premier, Minister and officials on the matter. Add it to the increasing list of failures.

The lack of an attempt to engage the Sunshine Coast community clearly demonstrates the lack of regard the Government has for the area.

And the alternative Government is no better.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.