Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
4:27AM Tuesday 02 December, 2008

Caloundra rents soar to Noosa level

Sharp rental fee increases in Caloundra over the past 12 months have put the southern seaside town on a par with Noosa as the most expensive place to rent on the Sunshine Coast.

The Residential Tenancy Authority’s most recent median rental price figures have shown significant jumps in almost all styles of accommodation across Queensland, leading housing minister Robert Schwarten to declare the private rental market in crisis.

Ipswich, Mount Isa, Kingaroy and Townsville took some of the hardest hits in terms of single category price hikes but on the Coast the biggest rises were seen around Caloundra.

Across the Coast the median price for a one-bedroom flat rose from $200 a week to $230 a week but in Caloundra it went almost three times higher, from $200 to $286.

Coast-wide, the median cost of a two-bedroom house went up from $260 to $290 but a larger than expected increase saw prices skyrocket from $250 to $300 in Caloundra to make it the most expensive.

Noosa was still the most expensive place to rent a two-bedroom flat or a four-bedroom house, but although it still topped the price category for three-bedroom flats the weekly rent on one in Noosa actually decreased from $380 to $360.

The only category in which Maroochydore aligned itself with its northern and southern neighbours was for a two-bedroom townhouse, with all three localities seeing a uniform rise from $255 to $300 between September, 2007, and September, 2008.

Catherine Nock and her family have just started to unpack boxes in their new Pelican Waters home after enduring a six-month rental battle.

Over four years the rent on the Nocks’ spacious three-bedroom Currimundi home had only risen by a total of $45 to $395 a week.

Ms Nock admitted they had been lucky to not have experienced greater increases in that time and were surprised when they realised what their money would get them in the current rental climate.

“I’ve had some friends who have had increases of $35 every time the owner of their property has put the rent up,” she said.

“Trying to find a house at $360 a week after four years out of the market was impossible, we simply could not do it.

“The problem we found was there were probably about eight to 10 families going for each property we had a look at and usually $390 per week was for a tiny home.

“But when so many families are going for it then you expect the agent to call you to say they’ve received an offer of an extra $30 a week on the rent from one of those families hoping they can be sure to secure it for themselves for 12 months.”

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 15 October, 2008 at 4:24 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
So does this mean Caloundra will now be classed (like Noosa) as an "Elitest" area??
on 15 October, 2008 at 3:19 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
i live in an older style 2 bed unit 1 minute from kings beach.my rent of $260 p.w. is fine for me.only risen by $5 in a year.perhaps because my rent is paid on time and the place is well looked after and have an owner that appreciates that.perhaps im in the minority.maybe there are too many greedy landlords out there that sieze any opportunity to up the rent.i hope caloundra stays the same.i love it here and would hate to be forced to move because of greedy landlords.holiday times etc command huge weekly rents of $1,000 or more , surely this enough for investers.
on 15 October, 2008 at 5:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I live in Caloundra and I am paying $405.00 for a 4 bedroom in it is not even moden.
But what choice do we have but to pay it
on 15 October, 2008 at 7:51 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
hey local girl.i see ur hurt/dunno what to say to you.no doubt you have kids.work is the big thing these days.the elusive dollar.dont know your age or circumstance.sometimes a new start can work.not that im advocating it, but iv found it exciting with new friends etc.the best thing is a fresh mind.you can make it anywhere if you have a mind to.good luck
on 16 October, 2008 at 2:59 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
chocbeach, you are fortunate that your rent hasnt increased considerably and its obvious you are a good tenant and have a good repoire with your landlord. just wondering, how long has your landlord owned the unit for? If he purhcased it cheaply before the boom, then he can afford to rent it at a lower rate than those who paid top dollar.

I just purchased an old style 2b 1 bath unit in alex heads, my repayments on it are approx $550 a week, plus rates plus body corporates. Rents are high because many landlords cannot afford to be a charity, they are not doing it out of greed. If i rent my place at $260pw then i would be subsidising over half the cost of the tenants accomodation. I wish i was in a position to be that generous but economically i cant!
on 16 October, 2008 at 4:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
what a charitable - yet backwards - attitude mmarch. you're not subsidising anyones accomodation, the tenants are subsidising your investment. no one buys an investment property to be generous, they do it for profit.
on 16 October, 2008 at 7:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
mmarch.the idea of investment properties,is just that,investment.be it for profit from sale because of market trends or for your retirement accomodation or your children.do you expect the rental clients to pay for your costs.you purchased for profit but some of that cost must be yours.there is no way your property can support a rental of $550 plus plus.i believe you know that.
on 16 October, 2008 at 10:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The housing affordability in a lot of areas in Australia is out of hand.

Up until a few years ago buying a house was affordable for most who were willing to put in the effort, and renting was also affordable and comfortable for a lot of people. So many chose to rent and have that extra disposable income to squander on luxury and unnecessary items instead of saving that money to get a deposit on a house. Life was good...affordable rent and money to spend on having a good time.

Now times are leaner and housing is a lot more expensive. Just think, if so many had chosen to save that beer, cigarette, holiday, outing etc money then they'd be in their own home, on a good fixed interest rate and life would still be good for them.

Let's face it, for a lot it's a simple case of 'you chose to miss the boat'.
on 17 October, 2008 at 7:09 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
hey justthinkin.not all renters are in that position because of bad planning.i rent now because of divorce settlement.double whammy for me.not only did my wife run off with a so call mate, her lawyer took all but the shirt off my back.so here i am,renting.my fault, i dont think so. i believe there are lots of stories similar to mine out there.dont be judgemental on the bigger picture.
on 17 October, 2008 at 9:05 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Yep..completely understand choc. And for what it's worth, I feel for you. I think it reeks when things like that happen to decent people such as yourself and I think the property settlement system needs a number ten steelcap in the backside. But that's a whole other story.

That's why I said 'many' not 'all'. And hey, I was one of that 'many' too. But luckily I did come in to personal circumstances that led me in to buying a home when it was still quite affordable. But I'd only blame myself if I had stayed one of the 'many'.
on 17 October, 2008 at 9:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
chocbeach, thanks for your reply, in now way was i suggesting that renters should pay the full cost of ownership of my unit, but at the same token investors dont invest in things at a loss. The rents are simply going up because the cost of the properties are going up. 5% return is a standard rule of thumb. 5% of a lot of money is still a lot of money!
I realise i have to contribute towards the ownership of my property and i dont expect tenants to pay for it all, but its not my place to rent it at a rate below half of what i must outlay, plus pay for the water, rates, body corps to look after the facilities my tenants enjoy, and then fix their air con and washing machines everytime they break it.

To describe landlords as 'greedy' is offensive to many mum and dad investors out there, we make the struggles to a) purchase a property for our futures, and b) provide accomodation for renters which is still cheaper than ownership and c) pay for the maintenance for their living.

If your landlord goes broke and has to sell your place, then that doesnt leave you with much security either, it is a two way street.

As i mentioned previously, you obviously have a good landlord and you are obviously a good tenant which is a great outcome for both parties in your scenario. If i was your landlord and you were an excellent tenant, i would be wanting to keep you as well.
on 17 October, 2008 at 12:19 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
thanks guys,i alone can be blamed for my circumstance.when i fiirst married we both saved a deposit for a house.got one,nice too.lake views,big block,swimming pool,nice stuff in general.had the bub,the whole shootin match.my demise was i started a business in 1983.(still operating after 26 years) by applying myself too much to build this up,i neglected the home front.so,understandly my wife sought love elsewhere.my fault,yes. iaccept my casds.my whole point of contributing was to make others aware that all renters are not renters because they squandered thier lot.thanks again
on 17 October, 2008 at 3:14 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I wish you well choc. I understand about the business thing. We started our own small business in 2000 and what a pain in the proverbial patootie it is as far as intruding in home life. I think we've eaten from our dinner table only several times over the past year as it's usually covered in paperwork.

Things happen for a reason though. And I hope your reason is you meet a lovely lady that will appreciate your efforts, and who also has more integrity. And I also hope karma catches up with your ex-wife.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.