12:00a.m. 4th September 2008
A Coast man has called for attacking magpies to be put down. Photo: David Thomas/152157
If a dog caused this sort of damage to a child the authorities would ensure it would be put down.
But if a bird is the cause of the injuries, then you are on your own.
Or at least that is the message one Maroochydore father received after he attempted to alert the Environmental Protection Agency and the Sunshine Coast Regional council to what he called a “rogue” magpie which caused serious facial injuries to his 14-year-old daughter.
Phil Press and his daughter Courtenay were enjoying their regular Saturday bicycle ride along Broadwater Avenue last week, when a vicious magpie swooped down and struck Courtenay on her ear.
The pair stopped and assessed the damage before quickly continuing on their way back home, when the magpie came in for a second round.
This time Courtenay tried to duck, but she lost her balance and fell off her bike sliding her face along the road.
“A neighbour got Courtenay into her car and I walked the bikes home and it did another run at me,” Mr Press said.
“If I had any way of taking care of the bird I would have then and there.
“I can’t think of any animal that can attack humans repeatedly and get away with it, as others in the street have also been attacked.”
Courtenay needed three stitches to repair a cut just under her eye and her parents are haunted by what could have happened – if avoiding the bird had forced their daughter into the path of a car.
Fourteen-year-old Courtenay Press shows the injuries she sustained when she fell off her bike after being hit by a swooping magpie.
Mr Press said residents in Broadwater Avenue had spoken to him about the magpie attacks and said it needed to be removed for safety reasons.
However, when he contacted the EPA, he was told that their policy was to not remove the birds. He was advised he could arrange for a commercial operator to assess the situation and if appropriate relocate it, at a personal cost of $250.
“That is a hell of a lot of money for most normal families,” he said.
“Someone should be taking responsibility for this.”
A spokeswoman for the EPA said a ranger visited Mr Press yesterday and assessed the area “as to immediate risk” and erected standard warning signs to inform residents of the presence of swooping birds.
She said the agency did not remove problem birds and instead encouraged people to take the necessary precautions to live with magpies during the nesting season which runs for about six to eight weeks between July and December, peaking between August and October.
“Removing a magpie does not negate a risk to the community. Once a bird is removed, another, more aggressive bird might move into that territory. For this reason the EPA does not generally move magpies,” she said.
How to avoid a magpie attack
The male magpie is responsible for most swoops and the swooping is almost entirely limited to the magpie ‘defence zone’ – the area around the nest tree.
While their territory is a few hectares, the defence zone is usually only about 100 metres in radius.
The magpie’s aim is to drive the perceived intruder away from the nest, not to cause injury. Leaving the area quickly almost always stops the swooping.
Stay well clear of areas where magpies are known to be swooping, particularly the nesting tree.
If you must enter the area, move through it quickly, but don’t run. Wear a hat and sunglasses or carry an umbrella. Cyclists should dismount and walk through the territory, which will reduce the chance of falling off the bike or swerving if a bird does swoop. Cyclists can also attach large cable ties to the back of their helmet – use two black ties, sticking up like antennae.
The EPA does not remove magpies, but in some areas there are licensed contractors who will perform this service. Call the EPA on 1300 130 372 or your local council for details.
See www.epa.qld.gov.au or call the EPA on 1300 130 372.
Recent Comments
I've always fed maggies wherever we lived, and they do remember that and although attack others, they don't attack us.
swooping is natural and fairly harmless, but if a magpie then cops some idiot waving a brolly or lump of wood, then they will attack more regularly. if some idiot on a bike starts waving something at the magpie they will associate bikes with danger.
we have four nests within a dogs walk of home. None of them attack my family. Yet they do attack other idiots who are known as a danger - ie those who wave things at them. I've been out the front gardening with magpies at my feet and watched them attack people on the other side of the street from us and the nest. That person has been seen in the past carrying a magpie attack stick to try and kill the magpie, not just ward it off. He has at t imes spent five minutes trying to kill a diving magpie. And people wonder why they swoop?
the magpie closest to our home knows our garden is cat free and therefore safe. It has got used to us as people and accepts we do no harm. The other close by magpie territories must be related or magpies are communicating who is dangerous and who isn't. I can't explain the magpies furtherst from us not swooping when other people are swooped other than they et each other know.
Are we seriously expected to put down every magpie that obeys it's instincts? Maybe we should just give up now and wrap our children in as much cotton wool as we can afford...
Harden up Maroochydore!
I knew were their tree was and avoided the area until the breeding season was over, which is what any reasonable father like Courtenay's should do, if you must go bike riding , go the other way!!
Or move to the Territory, there are no Magpies up there!!
Why not magpies? The argument that a more aggressive animal may move into the area is false logic. That could happen anytime, even with humans.
Also nice picture, I thought Courtney fell on the bitumen, but is clearly lying on the grass.
Also if the councils stop land development, the magpies, and other NATIVE animals might have somewhere safe to live. Which in turn will make it a bit safer for all of daddies little girls out their.
The photograph was contributed by the father, Ed
The photograph was contributed by the father, Ed.
I think sometimes we put the value of native fauna above that of people, let's hope there are no serious long term side-effects for the young girl, both physical & mental. Heaven forbid we should remove or put down ONE bird in order to protect the wider community. For crying out loud - what is of more value, can you seriously begrudge the father for wanting to vent anger/frustration over what happened to his daughter?
Ed: Mr Press provided the Daily with the photo of his daughter. The other photo was taken by a Daily photographer and depicts a legitimate magpie attack.
If this is your thinking then I suggest investing in a large roll of bubble wrap.
At the end of the day, Mr. Press, we are all animals and the bird is not attacking humans, it's attacking animals it see's as a threat to it's nest.
Just as you would do should your home come under attack.
Let nature be.
And if people don't like nature, have a good think about why you are here, or why you came here.
And maybe find some place else to live where concrete has replaced nature.
I once got attacked (if you can call it that) by one of these Magpies while walking across a rooftop car park to get to my car, sure, it shocked me, but I'm big enough and mature enough to realise that this animal is going by its natural instincts, it's not done with malicious intent.
I wonder if and when the kid/s eventually gets hurt by the birds..will these "unconcerned" parents just sit back and do nothing???? My son and I definately whoop & cheer on the Magpies!! Go the Magpies!!
led less talented magpies to think they can
get away with anything
There's a huge difference between an attacking dog and an attacking magpie: the dog is a domesticated animal in the control of a human whereas a Magpie is a wild animal and attacks to defend itself, its young, and its territory (most likely a nest). HUGE DIFFERENCE.
Leave the birds alone and stop encroaching into their habitat, it's what's provoking the attacks!
The fact that the birds are after children speaks volumes and indicates that the children might well be harassing the birds and elliciting the retaliatory strikes.
But far be if from most parents to ever say anything but "Oh, but MY child would never do that...!" Uh huh.
When it first started swooping I went on the internet and read that it's all bluff and very rarely do magpies attack and do damage so stupidly this lulled me into a false sense of security. My daughter was wearing a hat and it managed to knock her hat off and claw her head before my husband and I could get to her in time (we were only about 15 metres away). She has since been clawed again on the top of the head (leaving 3 clear cuts from its claw) and I've had enough.
I'm all for living with nature however I don't think it's fair that I have to keep her out of our own yard for 'approx 6 weeks' and I can't get a 17 month old to wave a stick/umbrella around or stare until they retreat. And making her keep a hat on is a big enough challenge (not that it helps) but there's no way she can wear sunglasses on the top of her head either.
Apart from the fear of serious injury my other biggest concern is that our little girl, who loves being outside, is going to develop a fear of birds let alone maybe not wanting to go outside. I'm already freaking out everytime we are outside keeping an eye on the bird and her and knowing that it's going to attack her any chance it gets. It even goes for her when walking from our front door to the car (approx 5 metres away).
I understand that this magpie is protecting it's children and frankly that's all I want to do for my child so think that removal/relocation of the swooping male would be the best solution.
That is fine if you know twhere the problem magpies are. Perhaps the Dialy or the SCRC could publish a daily map of known sites and hence we can all plan our journeys accordingly and avoid this conflict with nature?
Please voice your support or otherwise for this idea.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again