Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
7:58AM Tuesday 02 December, 2008

Pick me, pick me

Pick me, pick me

Sunshine Coast Grammar School parent Allan Brauer is annoyed that his son Jak, 13, has been told he can't go on a school rugby trip to Japan this month. Photo: Brett Wortman/178001

An angry father has called on Sunshine Coast Grammar School to explain why his son has been left out of his school rugby team’s trip to Japan later this month.

Alan Brauer said his son Jak had been devastated by a decision to leave him out of the travel plans, making him the only player in last weekend’s grand final winning Under-14 side to miss out.

Mr Brauer said his son, who has attended the private school all his schooling life, had met the criteria to make him eligible for the $1500 a head trip and could not understand how the school was unable to accommodate his son by finding an extra place for him in the 54-person touring party.

When he sought answers from the school, Mr Brauer said he was told by a staff member that it was because Jak had missed out on an off-season rugby camp during the Christmas holidays, which the 13-year-old had passed up on his dad’s advice so he could continue volunteering with the Mooloolaba Surf Life Saving Club.

“I said ‘you can’t do that to a young kid mate, it’s not professional sport, it’s under-14 rugby at school, you don’t have to train for 12 months’,” he said.

“He said ‘that shows the kind of dedication to rugby we want at the school’.

“There was no talk of Japan back then, it was just an off-season thing.”

Sunshine Coast Grammar headmaster Nigel Fairbairn declined to elaborate on the specific reasons Jak would be the one to miss out.

“Like any one of us, Alan is entitled to his view and his opinion and I have indicated to him on more than one occasion that obviously when you have to make a final decision that sometimes people are upset with the decision that is made,” he said.

Although Mr Brauer said he did not want to see another player cut to give his son a chance he was upset that his son seemed to be missing out due to a travelling capacity problem he believed could be easily solved with a few phone calls and emails.

But Mr Fairbairn said finding a spare place was logistically too difficult.

“We said right from the very beginning the size of the tour party would be 44 boys ... and we did look at the opportunity of seeing if it were possible to increase the size of the tour party and that was not possible,” he said.

Unlike his dad, Jak is reluctant make an issue of the decision, but his dad said he had decided to because he felt the school’s actions were fundamentally unfair and had not been backed by any valid reasons.

“He’s a good kid, loves rugby, lives for the team and has played in it for three years as well as being at that school since pre-school,” he said.

“He’s devastated because 22 of his mates are about to get on a plane to go on a trip they can’t stop talking about and he’s sitting there knowing he won’t be joining them.

“There are kids who have come into that team that have been at that school for six months.

“I just can’t cop it.”

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 5 September, 2008 at 5:44 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Loyalty means nothing to some,Jak should have been there in front of others that have only just joined the team.If his ability on the field kept him out then that should have been explained to him,I hope his ability in the classroom didn't play a factor as there is a trend on the coast that a certain few get what others don't because they have good marks,are the teachers pet or because of who they are.
Stick with it Jak and find another "team" I know of someones son whos ability worked against him in soccer,not that he was no good at it, but he was and still is very good and was resented for having skills others didn't.
Pedro
on 5 September, 2008 at 7 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If what Mr. Brauer says is true, and Jak's behaviour at school has been acceptable, then I feel sorry for the kid. Surely something could've been worked out. He's a long-term student, and no doubt he and his family have shown loyalty to the school over the years.

But I have to say, was there a real need to put it in the local paper? If I were Jak I'd feel rather embarrassed.
on 5 September, 2008 at 7:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I wonder too if it isnt a case of Dad just not getting what he wants and spitting the dummy like a spoilt child. The child here doesnt want an issue made of it - he is prepared to cop it on the chin and move on. Maybe follow his example. There are disappointments in life and this is one of them.
on 5 September, 2008 at 9:08 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The facts in this article need checking. The players knew in August last year there would be a trip to Japan in 2008 for 22 players from the 1st XV squad and 22 players from the under 14 squad. Commitment to the rugby program and to their school work and behavior were explained as the criteria. 26 boys started in the under 14 team and 28 in the 1st XV so in fact 10 boys not one were not selected to tour. Each player contributed $1500 but the cost per player was well in excess and most of these funds were donated privately. At the end of the day 10 boys were not selected and it's a shame one father has embarrassed his son by making it public.
on 5 September, 2008 at 9:31 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Certain facts have been left out of this story.The cost of the trip is $5900.00 per child which was heavily subsidised by fundraising and left $1,500.00 for parents to pay.Hence stiff criteria.There are seven players not attending the tour not just one.All kids and their parents were aware of the trip in Sep/Oct 2007 and all knew the guidelines.All knew only 44 children would be going.22 under 14's and 22First Fifteen.I think it's a case of don't let the truth get in the way of a good story .I feel sory for Jac and his mother. Facts Facts Facts please.Two sides to this story.
on 5 September, 2008 at 11:32 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Poor Jak, I can relate his fathers heartbreak over his son being the only boy on the football team not selected to travel to Japan. I'm sure young lad is devestated. However, there are some important facts absent from this story. Aside from young Jak there were 9 other students that were also denied a place in the Japan squad (from both the under 14's and the 1st Fifteen). All students and parents were made aware of the selection criteria in late 2007. Why have the parents of 9 others students understood and accepted that their child did not meet the rigid selection criteria with good grace?

I think it extremely selfish of Jak's father to have extended the blow for the young boy by making the situation public.
on 5 September, 2008 at 12:21 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Would the Wallabies take a player on tour who hadn't attended training sessions or had brought the game into disrepute off field? Dedication to the game doesn't start when you get picked for a state or international side, it starts much earlier.

Those 44 kids who have been picked to Tour have obviously met the selection criteria set by the school - whether that be sporting, academic, behavioural or financial. I sympathise with Jak if he was the 23rd player in the Under 14s, but does that mean the 23rd, 24th, 25th and 26th Under 15s should also have gone. The line has to be drawn somewhere.

If the parents only have to pay $1500 of the nearly $6000 it is costing to send each of these boys overseas - either somebody has sold a lot of raffle tickets, or there is a very generous benefactor out there who must be wondering if it's worth it. It sounds to me like somebody's Dad wasn't listening when the tour was announced - or felt their son was better than the other boys and therefore didn't have to comply with the same rules.
on 5 September, 2008 at 1:10 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
talk about the father of this kid pulling your leg, what he is saying is just rubbish. It was an end of season / year rugby academy where you had to stump up some dosh to participate as part of the japan rules through to the next year. not a camp, big diferrence. who made the decision for the kid not to go, yeh odds on the old man and yeh it back fired badly on the old man. do ya really think this poor kid would have made the decision not to go to the rugby academy but the surf club, da NO.
Go Jak
on 5 September, 2008 at 2:52 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
GOsh what a predicament we have now. This sort of thing can and probably will have a hugely detrimental effect on Jak, his family and even his fellow team mates.

Can I humbly request on Jak's behalf that the article be removed before any further damage is done.

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.