12:00a.m. 5th September 2008
Sunshine Coast Grammar School parent Allan Brauer is annoyed that his son Jak, 13, has been told he can't go on a school rugby trip to Japan this month. Photo: Brett Wortman/178001
An angry father has called on Sunshine Coast Grammar School to explain why his son has been left out of his school rugby team’s trip to Japan later this month.
Alan Brauer said his son Jak had been devastated by a decision to leave him out of the travel plans, making him the only player in last weekend’s grand final winning Under-14 side to miss out.
Mr Brauer said his son, who has attended the private school all his schooling life, had met the criteria to make him eligible for the $1500 a head trip and could not understand how the school was unable to accommodate his son by finding an extra place for him in the 54-person touring party.
When he sought answers from the school, Mr Brauer said he was told by a staff member that it was because Jak had missed out on an off-season rugby camp during the Christmas holidays, which the 13-year-old had passed up on his dad’s advice so he could continue volunteering with the Mooloolaba Surf Life Saving Club.
“I said ‘you can’t do that to a young kid mate, it’s not professional sport, it’s under-14 rugby at school, you don’t have to train for 12 months’,” he said.
“He said ‘that shows the kind of dedication to rugby we want at the school’.
“There was no talk of Japan back then, it was just an off-season thing.”
Sunshine Coast Grammar headmaster Nigel Fairbairn declined to elaborate on the specific reasons Jak would be the one to miss out.
“Like any one of us, Alan is entitled to his view and his opinion and I have indicated to him on more than one occasion that obviously when you have to make a final decision that sometimes people are upset with the decision that is made,” he said.
Although Mr Brauer said he did not want to see another player cut to give his son a chance he was upset that his son seemed to be missing out due to a travelling capacity problem he believed could be easily solved with a few phone calls and emails.
But Mr Fairbairn said finding a spare place was logistically too difficult.
“We said right from the very beginning the size of the tour party would be 44 boys ... and we did look at the opportunity of seeing if it were possible to increase the size of the tour party and that was not possible,” he said.
Unlike his dad, Jak is reluctant make an issue of the decision, but his dad said he had decided to because he felt the school’s actions were fundamentally unfair and had not been backed by any valid reasons.
“He’s a good kid, loves rugby, lives for the team and has played in it for three years as well as being at that school since pre-school,” he said.
“He’s devastated because 22 of his mates are about to get on a plane to go on a trip they can’t stop talking about and he’s sitting there knowing he won’t be joining them.
“There are kids who have come into that team that have been at that school for six months.
“I just can’t cop it.”
Recent Comments
Stick with it Jak and find another "team" I know of someones son whos ability worked against him in soccer,not that he was no good at it, but he was and still is very good and was resented for having skills others didn't.
Pedro
But I have to say, was there a real need to put it in the local paper? If I were Jak I'd feel rather embarrassed.
I think it extremely selfish of Jak's father to have extended the blow for the young boy by making the situation public.
Those 44 kids who have been picked to Tour have obviously met the selection criteria set by the school - whether that be sporting, academic, behavioural or financial. I sympathise with Jak if he was the 23rd player in the Under 14s, but does that mean the 23rd, 24th, 25th and 26th Under 15s should also have gone. The line has to be drawn somewhere.
If the parents only have to pay $1500 of the nearly $6000 it is costing to send each of these boys overseas - either somebody has sold a lot of raffle tickets, or there is a very generous benefactor out there who must be wondering if it's worth it. It sounds to me like somebody's Dad wasn't listening when the tour was announced - or felt their son was better than the other boys and therefore didn't have to comply with the same rules.
Go Jak
Can I humbly request on Jak's behalf that the article be removed before any further damage is done.
Have your say
We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Your comments will be checked, for legal reasons, before being posted live.
Thanks again for contributing to the Daily's online community.
We value your views.
Comment again