Sub Main Menu
sunshine coast
noosa
coolum
national
world
8:57AM Sunday 05 July, 2009

Two-headed fish found in Noosa

Two-headed fish found in Noosa

A close up view of the two-headed fish embryo. Photo: Contributed

Reports of hundreds of thousands of two-head fish being born at a Sunshine Coast hatchery have prompted an expert to call for the ban of certain agricultural chemicals.

Fish veterinarian Doctor Matt Landos is calling for urgent bans and testing of agriculture chemicals he believes caused the birth of mutant two-headed bass at Boreen Point.

The University of Sydney honorary lecturer and research associate said mature bass caught from the Noosa River in August and their eggs were used as part of a restocking program at a hatchery.

About 90% of larvae that hatched from the eggs had two heads and died within two days, he said.

“They are being born with two heads – it is just striking,” Dr Landos said.

“It is possible the contamination is in the catchment where routine macadamia production involves legal use of occasional chemical sprays."

Dr Landos, who is also principal of the Future Fisheries Veterinary Services, believed chemical spray drift or run off was affecting the fish their larvae.

“This chemical – carbendazim – was removed from use in the US in 2001 for its effects on reproduction in humans."

Claims about two-headed fish

An Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries spokeswoman said a macadamia farm was being investigated.

"The initial investigation, which began a couple of years ago, was discontinued because no breaches of chemical use could be identified, and there was a lack of evidence to support further actions," she said.

"The investigation was reopened late last year when new complaints about fish health were reported.

"A fish pathologist and an aquaculture officer promptly visited the fish hatchery in December to undertake a thorough assessment of fish health.

"Samples of the pond water at the hatchery came back negative for chemical residues."

She said further test results were due in February.

Recent Comments

Add a comment
on 12 January, 2009 at 4:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
HA HA, and Springfield thought they had bad with the tree eyed fish
on 12 January, 2009 at 4:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
all of those who thought greenies wee nutters - have a look at the two headed kitten of the sea
on 12 January, 2009 at 6:38 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ed; How does one respond to this news item and it clearly shows the Queensland Government not willing to go further and put in place, tougher regulations governing the using of chemicals. Whilst the Federal Government should also be asked for a response to this disturbing environmental item; where does it stop? The video clearly provides us readers with a disturbing insight and thanks.
on 12 January, 2009 at 8:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The chemical giants dont care as long as they are making Money and the governments get bribed by the chemical companies to turn a blind eye. So what chance do we have.
on 12 January, 2009 at 9:28 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
The State Government has just gone ahead and INTENTIONALLY added another synthetic industrial chemical to our drinking water...!
Another win for chemical companies (the only benefit) and who knows how that will affect the health of people in years to come!
on 12 January, 2009 at 10:40 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
No more macadamias will enter my shopping basket unless they're organic. What does this do for the Noosa BioSphere? A bit of joke unless this spraying is stopped. Time to start sending emails and chatting to people.
on 13 January, 2009 at 4:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
If i wasn`t a descendant of the first european settlers of the lake i`d say something different but instead i`ll say that two heads are better than one.
on 13 January, 2009 at 7:16 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
so why on earth do governments allow farmers to use chemicals that have been banned over seas?

sort of like third world countries still using DDT to use up the manufacturers stocks

what's the names of the farmers poisoning our water ways? who do they sell their tainted macadamias to? - coles and woollies??
on 13 January, 2009 at 8:15 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I'm surprised that this story has made the headlines in the Daily. I thought that the concensus south of the Maroochy River was that everyone in Noosa has two heads.
on 13 January, 2009 at 10:52 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The fish probably migrated from Tasmania.
on 13 January, 2009 at 1:04 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Noosa River is polluted if no chemical residue is found in hatchery water. Your assumptions assume the adult fish have not accumulated from Noosa River.
on 14 January, 2009 at 7:08 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
You base your comments on a You tube Blog by unidentified persons without varified knowledge, time, date or location. Times and dates can be changed on still and video cams. Nothing I saw on the "blog" video Proves any thing. 1. You can't Identify any macadamia plantations. 2. You cant varify the wind is coming from the so called plantation or any direction. All I see is a overgrown muddy pond without any reference to the buildings, which the participents admit is where the smoke is being wind driven. A still photo of some farmer spraying trees at an unknown location on an unknown date in an unknown direction from the "POND". The authorities have not found any miss use by the farmer, on the contary they have vindicated him. If you believe every thing you see and hear on You Tube and other such web sites. then you are very gullable and blind. The video proves nothing more than there is a place someware and the gent knows how to make smoke. FACTS and VARIFICATION of the accusations is needed for any of this to be taken seriously. It shows 1 deformed fish embreo from an unvarified sauce, date and location. Get Real. Stop dreaming.

Ed. The claims, made by Dr Landos as well as in the YouTube video, do need to be verified. Authorities are investigating, as pointed out in the article.
on 14 January, 2009 at 8:41 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
this chemical is also know to cause defects in humans and cancer....we may laugh about the 3 eyed fish but when it hits our unborn children the joke may be less funny...get onto your local Rep if you live near here..I would!
on 14 January, 2009 at 1:32 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I agree with Eggbag...to be sure;
get onto your local rep and rattle the cage !
If that doesn't work we should get Bart and Lisa in on a consultancy basis, as they are the only people who I know who have dealt with this problem in the past.

A theory is that it's being caused by the Fluoride in the water. Has mass medication of the public has already contaminated the environment ?

Someone else also mentioned that the fingerlings had been sourced in Gympie, in polystyrene boxes from Ipswich, delivered in a truck manufactured in Tasmania running on high sulphur diesel.

However latest reports say that Erin Brockavich was seen camping at Boreen Point last week, running around mumbling something about investigating a crabpot cluster.

Personally I'm taking the boat up the biosphere river to pump some two headed yabbies. ;-P
on 14 January, 2009 at 1:40 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Apparently Peter Garret almost landed a three headed bass in the Tamar river the other week.

But seriously , three heads or two heads doesn't worry me so much.

What are the EPA going to do about those duck- billed beavers infesting our creeks ?
on 15 January, 2009 at 3:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
This issue does highlight the problems corporate donations to political parties. How else can you explain why chemicals that are banned in the US are allowed (dumped) in Australia. The farm and petro-chemical lobbies are very powerful and have good access to the politicians, better access than you or I. The previous Federal government was well known for politicising the public service, stacking agencies with contracted people willing to say what the politicians wanted to hear, Rudd has carried on the same practice and same staff.

If the politicians were not in receipt of corporate donations, they and their appointed agencies might have some credibility, but then again carbendazim would have be banned in 2001 rather than encouraged. The cautionary principle would see the use of the suspect chemicals halted until cleared of suspicion.
on 17 January, 2009 at 7:37 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
How many chemicals and antibiotics are chucked in that fish pond to stop the disease and bacteria breeding. You can't expect healthy seafood to come out of that scum. Maybe the tighter regulations should be aimed at fish farming so we don't get the same disease ridden crap that we import from overseas. Go ocean caught!!!!!!!!!
on 19 January, 2009 at 9:05 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
What I would give for a three tailed prawn!!!!
on 22 January, 2009 at 4:27 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Are they ill tempered? (Had to say it...)

Oddly enough, I have actually been to that hatchery (for completely unassociated reasons) about 1 1/2 years ago and was informed by the person running the hatchery of the issue with the macadamia farm across the paddock that sprays without worrying about wind direction. To me it seems very possible that the over spray has contaminated the hatchery's but even worse still, the hatchery owners house was in the same direction as the hatchery's. I would be more concerned about my own health before the bloody bass!!!

Have your say

We welcome comments on our stories and blogs - after all it's your site. Please note comments should be on-topic and not abusive. Comments are checked before publication.